Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:06:55.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpersonal disturbance in OCD and its place in the professional consultation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

John O'Connor
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Ray Fuller
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Mary Fell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

Abstract

People with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) typically experience their relationships with others with a high level of trepidation and bring their anxieties into their work with professionals. We have written this paper to describe experiences of working with people with diagnoses of OCD and the impression that we have formed about the kinds of relationship that builds up in the early stages of this work. We believe that it is important to consider the quality of these professional relationships because of their impact on the patient's ability to benefit from whatever intervention we propose. Here, we place particular attention on the roles of magical thinking, disturbed relationships and the fear of rejection. The perspective presented here is designed to complement those of other approaches to OCD – including the neurological, behavioural and cognitive-behavioural. The following themes relating to the social and interpersonal experiences of people with OCD are examined here: (a) their general tentativeness and uncertainty in social interactions, (b) their fear of being damaged by others in social interactions, (c) their magical thinking relating to damaging others.

Type
Perspective
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.American Psychiatric Association. The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders – 4th edition (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: APA 1994Google Scholar
2.Hantouche, EG, Bouhassira, M, Lancrenon, Set al.Prevalence of obsessive compulsive disorders in a large French patient population in psychiatric consultation. Encephale 1995; 21: 571580.Google Scholar
3.Sasson, Y, Zohar, J, Chopra, Met al.Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a world view. J Clinical Psychiatry 1997; 58: 710.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Laidlaw, TM, Falloon, IRH, Barnfather, Det al.The stress of caring for people with obsessive compulsive disorders. Community Mental Health J 1999; 35:443450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Salkovskis, PM. Understanding and treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 1999; 37: Suppl. S29S52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Rapoport, JL. The boy who couldn't stop washing: The experience and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. London: Harper Collins, 1990.Google Scholar
7.Qreenson, RR. The working alliance and the transference neurosis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 1965; 34: 155181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Brenner, C. Working alliance, therapeutic alliance, and transference. J Am Psychoanalytic Assoc 1979; 27:137157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Freud, S. Beyond the pleasure principle. In: Strachey, J (Ed). The complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth, 1961 (1920).Google Scholar
10.Balint, M. Early developmental states of the ego: primary object-love. Int J Psycho-Analysis 1937; 30: 265–73.Google Scholar
11.Heimann, P. (1949). On counter-transference. In: About children and children-no-longer: The collected papers of Paula Heimann. Tonnesmann, M (Ed.) London: Tavistock, 1989.Google Scholar
12.Bollas, C. Expressive uses of the countertransference: Notes to the patient from oneself. Contemporary Psychoanalysis 1983; 19:134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar