Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:47:03.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opiate-dependent adolescents in Ireland: a descriptive study at treatment entry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

John Fagan ,
Leena Naughton  and
Bobby Smyth
John Fagan*
Affiliation:
The Drug Treatment Centre Board, 30-31 Pearse St, Dublin 2 and YoDA (Youth Drug and Alcohol service), Glen Abbey Building, Belgard Road, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland
Leena Naughton
Affiliation:
The Drug Treatment Centre Board, 30-31 Pearse St, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Bobby Smyth
Affiliation:
The Drug Treatment Centre Board, 30-31 Pearse St, Dublin 2, Ireland.
*
*Correspondence Email: johnc.fagan@mailm.hse.ie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the drug history and co-existing psycho-social problems among under-19 year olds accessing treatment for opiate dependency, including methadone maintenance, and examine for any gender differences.

Method: A descriptive study of under-19 years assessed at the largest drug treatment clinic in Dublin, Ireland, between October 2000 and September 2006. Data was obtained through review of case notes, assessment questionnaires and urine drug screens.

Results: Eighty-six young people were included. Their mean age was 16.8 years. Forty-six (54%) were female. Only 26 (30%) reported an intact family of origin. Twenty-three (27%) had been in care. Mean age for first use of any illicit drug was 12.4 years, and for heroin was 14.8 years. The mean age of leaving school was 14.4 years; 42 (49%) first tried heroin after leaving school. Forty-one (48%) had a history of homelessness. Forty-four (51%) had previously injected; 26 (30%) were currently injecting. Fifty-six (65%) had not been screened for blood-borne diseases; twenty-one (24%) subsequently tested positive for hepatitis C. Thirty-eight (48%) had previous convictions; 33 (38%) were facing charges. Forty-five (52%) had previously seen a psychiatrist; nine (11%) had received inpatient psychiatric treatment. Boys were more likely to leave school early, have a substance-abusing sibling, and to have a past conviction. Girls were more likely to have a partner, and have taken a deliberate overdose.

Conclusions: This study highlights the multiple and complex needs of teenagers abusing opiates. Services seeking to meet their needs will require a broad range of interventions and excellent interagency co-operation.

Keywords

AdolescentsTeenagersOpiate-dependencyMethadone maintenanceGender differencesIreland.
Type
Original Papers
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 46 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hopfer, CJ, Khuri, E, Crowley, TJ, Hooks, S. Adolescent heroin use: A review of descriptive and treatment literature. J Substance Abuse Treat 2002; 23: 231–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Rowan, AB, Fudala, PJ, Mulligan, J. The medical management of adolescent heroin dependence. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2000; 2(6): 527–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Chrome, I, Chistian, J, Green, C. The development of a unique designed community drug service for adolescents. Drugs – Education, Prevention, and Policy 2000; 7: 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bukstein, OG. Influences on the risk and course of substance use and abuse in adolescents. Curr Op Psychiatry 1985; 8: 218–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Spooner, C, Mattick, RP, Noffs, W. A study of the patterns and correlates of substance use among adolescents applying for drug treatment. Aust NZ J Public Health 2000 Oct; 24(5): 492–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). 2002 Annual report on the state of the drugs problem in the European Union and Norway. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2002.Google Scholar
7.Kelly, A, Carvallo, M, Teljeur, C. Prevalence of opiate use in Ireland 2000-2001. A 3-source Capture Recapture study, NACD, Dublin, 2003,.Google Scholar
8.Gervin, M, Hughes, R, Banford, L, Smyth, BP, Keenan, E. Heroin smoking by “chasing the dragon” in young opiate users in Ireland: stability and associations with use to “come down” off “Ecstasy”. J Subst Abuse Treat 2001; 20(4): 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Smyth, BP, O'Brien, M. Children Attending Addiction Treatment Services in Dublin 1990-1999. Eur Addict Res 2004; 10: 68–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Mullen, L, Barry, J. An Analysis of 15-19-year-old first attendere at the Dublin Needle Exchange, 1990-97. Addiction 2001; 96: 251–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Burniston, S, Dodd, M, Elliot, L, Orr, L, Watson, L. Drug Treatment Services for Young People. Scottish Executive Office: Edinburgh, 2002Google Scholar
12.American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Practice parameters for assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with substance use disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997 (suppl); 36:140S–56S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Marsch, L. The Efficacy of methadone maintenance intervention in reducing illicit opiate use, HIV risk behaviour and criminality: a meta-analysis. Addiction 1998; 93: 515–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Gossop, M, Marsden, J, Duncan, S, Tara, K. The National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS): 4-5 year follow-up results. Addiction 2003; 98(3): 291–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Godfrey, C, Stewart, D, Gossop, M. Economic analysis of costs and consequences of the treatment of drug misuse: two-year outcome data from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS). Addiction 2004; 99: 696–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Van Beusekom, Iguchi. A review of recent advances in knowledge about methadone maintenance treatment. RAND, Geneva, 2001.Google Scholar
17.Farrell, Met al.Methadone maintenance treatment in opiate dependence: a review. BMJ; 1994; 309: 997–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Robins, LN, Przybeck, TR. Age of onset of drug use as a factor in drug and other disorders. NIDA Res Monogr 1985; 56: 178–92.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Health Advisory Service. Report. Children and Young People Substance Misuse Services – The Substance of Young Needs. HMSO: London, 1996.Google Scholar
20.Carrick, PA. Key components of drug treatment provision for young people: a Delphi approach. J Subs Use 2004; 9(1): 20–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Ieland's National Drug Strategy, 2001-2008. Dublin: Government Stationary Office, 2001.Google Scholar
22.Copello, AG, Templeton, L, Velleman, R. Family interventions for drug and alcohol misuse: is there a best practice? Curr Opin Psych 2006; 19: 271–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Stanton, MD, Shadish, WR. Outcome, attrition, and family-couples treatment for drug abuse: a meta-analysis and review of the controlled, comparative studies. Psychol Bull 1997; 122: 170–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Long, J, Lynn, E, Felly, F. Trends in treated problem drug use in Ireland, 1998 to 2002. Occasional Paper 17. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2005.Google Scholar
25.Grube, JW, Morgan, M. Smoking, drinking and other drug use among Dublin postprimary school pupils. Dublin: ESRI General Publications, 1986.Google Scholar
26.Lynskey, M, Hall, W. The effects of adolescent cannabis use on educational attainment: A review. Addiction 2000; 95: 1621–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Lloyd, C. Risk factors for problem drug use: Identifying vulnerable groups. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 1998; 5(3):217–232.Google Scholar
28.Mayock, P. Choosers or Losers: Influences on Young peoples choices about Drugs in Inner-city Dublin. The Children's Research Centre, University of Dublin Trinity College, 2000. ISBN 1-902230-07-8.Google Scholar
29.Lawless, M, Corr, C. Drug Use among the Homeless Population in Ireland. National Advisory Committee on Drugs; Dublin Stationary Office, 2005: 54–55.Google Scholar
30.Jessor, R, Jessor, SL. Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A Longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic press, 1977: 281.Google Scholar
31.Prochaska, JO, DiClemente, CC. The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing the traditional boundaries of therapy. Malabar, FL: Kriegar, 1984.Google Scholar
32.Carr, A. In: Family Therapy – Concepts, Process and Practice. 2nd Ed. Chichester: The Wiley series in clinical psychology; 2006: 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar