Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:29:02.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards a comprehensive Mayo psychiatric service: a preliminary survey of longstay patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Deirdre A Garvey
Affiliation:
St. Mary's Hospital, Castlebar
Susan M Finnerty
Affiliation:
St. Mary's Hospital, Castlebar
Eamon J Smith
Affiliation:
St. Mary's Hospital, Castlebar

Abstract

A group of 183 longstay psychiatric patients were evaluated regarding their immediate and future discharge potential in order to assist in the future planning of the Mayo Psychiatric Services. Comparisons were made between new longstay patients, who were defined as those who had been in hospital for greater than one but less than five years, and old longstay patients who were in hospital for greater than five years. Age and sex comparisons were also made.

While 28% of those included in the survey were thought fit for immediate discharge, a further 18% were thought to require further active rehabilitation before discharge into the community within one year. The accommodation requirements of those needing continuing inpatient care are discussed. Age and length of time in hospital were found to be associated with discharge potential. Sex difference was not found to be significant. Implications for the development of the service are dicussed on the basis of the findings.

Type
Practice Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Census 86: Local Population Report 2nd series No. 22 County Mayo. Dublin: Central Statistic Office, 1986.Google Scholar
2.The psychiatric service – planning for the future. Report of a study group on the development of the psychiatric service. Dublin: Stationary Office, 1984.Google Scholar
3.Livingston, MG, Bryson, A. The Glasgow rehabilitation survey. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 154: 620624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.McCreadie, RG, Robinson, ADT, Wilson, AOA. The Scottish survey of new chronic in-patients: two year follow-up. Br J Psychiatry 1985; 147: 637640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Mann, SA, Cree, W. “New” long-stay psychiatric patients: a national sample survey of fifteen mental hospitals in England and Wales 1972-73. Psychol Med 1976; 6: 613616.Google Scholar
6.McCreadie, RG, Wilson, AOA, Burton, LL. The Scottish survey of ‘new chronic’ in-patients. Br J Psychiatry 1983; 143: 564571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pritlove, J. Accommodation without resident staff for expsychiatric patients: changing trends and needs. Br J Social Work 1983; 13: 1.Google Scholar
8.Wing, JK, Furlong, R. A haven for the severely disabled within the context of a comprehensive psychiatric community service. Br J Psychiatry 1986; 149: 449457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Ryan, P, Hewett, SH. A pilot study of hostels for the mentally ill. Social Work Today 1976; 6: 774778.Google Scholar
10.Shepherd, G. Planning the rehabilitation of the individual. In: Watts, N, Bennett, DH, eds. Theory and practice of psychiatric rehabilitation. Chichester: Wiley, 1983: 329348.Google Scholar
11.Affleck, JW, McGuire, RJ. The measurement of psychiatric rehabilitation status: a review of the needs and a new scale. Br J Psychiatry 1984; 145: 517525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Platt, SD, Weyman, AJ, Hirsch, SR, Hewett, S. The Social Behaviour Assessment Schedule (SBAS): rationale, contents, scoring and rehability of a new interview schedule. Social Psychiatry 1980; 15: 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Brewin, CR, Wing, JK, Mangen, SP, Brugha, TS, MacCarthy, B. Principals and practice of measuring needs in the long-term mentally ill: the MRC Needs for Care Assessment. Psychol Med 1987; 17: 971981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar