Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:57:38.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Vasarhelyi Method of Child Art Psychotherapy in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: a stakeholder survey of clinical supervisors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

M. McGovern
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Medical Science, Dublin, Ireland
A. Byrne
Affiliation:
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Department of Child Art Psychotherapy, Dublin, Ireland
M. McCormack
Affiliation:
Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Department of Child Art Psychotherapy, Dublin, Ireland
A. Mulligan*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Dublin, Ireland Dublin North City and County CAMHS, Dublin, Ireland
*
*Address for correspondence: A. Mulligan, UCD Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Catherine McAuley Education and Research Centre, Nelson Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.(Email: Aisling.mulligan@ucd.ie)

Abstract

Objectives

The Vasarhelyi Method of Child Art Psychotherapy (CAP) is a largely understudied psychotherapeutic modality. This study aims to describe the Vasarhelyi Method of CAP and to describe a stakeholder survey of the views and attitudes of CAP placement supervisors towards CAP among various Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) teams nationwide.

Methods

A phone- and letter-based survey of 17 CAP placement supervisors who oversee CAP masters students attached to CAMHS teams was performed. A questionnaire was designed enquiring about their experiences with CAP in their clinic and their thoughts on the validity of CAP in various conditions/patient demographics. Participants received written correspondence and were asked to return the survey by post; this was followed up by a telephone call to complete missing surveys.

Results

In all, 12 (70.6%) complete surveys were returned. Of the 12 respondents, all considered the CAP student to be a valuable member of the team. In total, 10 respondents (83.33%) stated they would make regular use of the service if it were made available to them. With regard to the therapy itself, nine respondents (75%) believed it was better for internalising symptoms than externalising symptoms. Depression, anxiety, attachment difficulties, trauma, deliberate self-harm and possible psychosomatic illnesses are the conditions viewed as receiving the most benefit from CAP. No gender difference was reported.

Conclusion

CAP is considered an effective modality and valuable addition to a psychotherapeutic repertoire. Further, more extensive studies are needed in this field.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© College of Psychiatrists of Ireland 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alavinezhad, R, Mousavi, M, Sohrabi, N (2014). Effects of art therapy on anger and self-esteem in aggressive children. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 113, 111117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlow, J (1995). Psychoanalysis. In Current Psychotherapies (ed. R. J. Corsini and D. Wedding), p. 23. Brooks/Cole: Belmont, USA.Google Scholar
Beebe, A, Gelfand, EW, Bender, BJ (2010). A randomized trial to test the effectiveness of art therapy for children with asthma. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 126, 263266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breuer, J, Freud, S (1891). Studies on Hysteria. Basic Books Inc. Publishers: New York, USA.Google Scholar
Case, C, Dalley, T (2014). The Handbook of Art Therapy, 3rd edn. Routledge: London, UK and New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S (1891). Psychotherapy of hysteria. In Studies on Hysteria. Basic Books Inc. Publishers: New York, USA. pp 253305.Google Scholar
Hashemian, P, Jarahi, L (2014). Effect of painting therapy on aggression in educable intellectually disabled students. Psychology 5, 2058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health (2013). Guidance for commissioners of child and adolescent mental health services. October (www.jcpmh.info/wp-content/uploads/jcpmh-camhs-guide.pdf) Accessed 17 February 2016.Google Scholar
National Health Service (2013). National Health Service, Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/news/working-with-under-18-year-olds-guidance-for-commission) Accessed 18 February 2016.Google Scholar
Joseph, B (1998). Thinking about a Playroom. Journal of Child Psychotherapy 24, 359366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, CG (1966). The Practice of Psychotherapy, 2nd edn. p. 49. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London, UK.Google Scholar
Jung, CG (1968). Analytical psychology: its theory and practice. In The Tavistock Lectures (p. 198. Pantheon Book: New York, USA.Google Scholar
IAPT Programme (2011). Working with under 18 year olds: Guidance for Commissioners, IAPT service providers and those working in IAPT services (http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/about-iapt) Accessed 18 February 2016.Google Scholar
Kam, S, Midgley, N (2006). Exploring ‘Clinical Judgement’: how do child and adolescent mental health professionals decide whether a young person needs individual psychotherapy? Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry 11, 2744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanyado, M, Horne, A (1999). The therapeutic relationship and process. In The Handbook of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy (ed. M. Lanyado and A. Horne), pp. 5572. Routledge: London, UK and New York, USA.Google Scholar
Malhi, GS, Lingford-Hughes, AR, Young, AH (2016). Antidepressant treatment response: ‘I want it all, and I want it now!’. British Journal of Psychiatry 208, 101103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, DA, Peterson, C, Kunkel, EJ, Hauck, WW, Pequignot, E, Rhodes, L, Brainard, GC (2006). A randomized, controlled trial of mindfulness-based art therapy (MBAT) for women with cancer. Psychooncology 15, 363373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulligan, A, McNicholas, F, Moran, T (2008). Routine investigations in paediatric psychopharmacology. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 25, 1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naumburg, M (1966). Dynamically Oriented Art Therapy: Its Principles and Practices. Grune and Stratton: New York, USA.Google Scholar
Nugent, M, Carmody, O, Kenny, PJ (2015). Expectations of general practitioners for patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty. Irish Medical Journal 108, 229231.Google ScholarPubMed
Presa, E (2014). Ways of being: transitional objects and the work of art. In The Winnicott Tradition – Lines of Development, Evolution of Theory and Practice Over the Decades (ed. M. Boyle Spelman and F. Thomson-Salo), pp. 315326. Karnac: London.Google Scholar
Reynolds, MW, Nabors, L, Quinlan, A (2000). The effectiveness of art therapy: does it work? Art Therapy 17, 207213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, J (2007). Freud’s Art – Psychoanalysis Retold. Routledge: London & New York, USA. p. 9.Google Scholar
Stiles, WB, Barkham, M, Wheeler, S (2015). Effect of duration of psychological therapy on recovery and improvement rates: evidence from UK routine practice. The British Journal of Psychiatry 207, 115122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensk, AC, Oster, I, Thyme, KE, Magnusson, E, Sjödin, M, Eisemann, M, Aström, S, Lindh, J (2009). Art therapy improves experienced quality of life among women undergoing treatment for breast cancer: a randomized controlled study. European Journal of Cancer Care 18, 6977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasarhelyi, V (1981). What happened on Ben Nevis? Psychotherapy with pictorial means and the time aspect of pictorial thinking. Special study, Goldsmith’s College, London 27–45.Google Scholar
Vasarhelyi, V (1990). The cat, the fish, the man and the bird: or how to be a nothing. Illness behavior in children; the case study of a 10 year old girl. In Working with Children in Art Therapy (ed C. Case and T. Dalley), pp. 5471. Routledge: London, UK.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D (1971). Therapeutic Consultations in Child Psychiatry. Basic Books: New York, USA. p. 3.Google Scholar