Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:09:56.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wernicke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Caoimhghin S Breathnach
Caoimhghin S Breathnach*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, University College, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carl Wernicke [1848-1905] gave the first description of sensory aphasia [1874] and of ophthalmoplegic encephalopathy [1881]. In addition, his notion of ‘Sejunction’ [1894] foreshadowed Bleuler's ‘schizophrenia [1908], and he may be justly said to have been the first successful organic neuropsychiatrist.

Keywords

Wernickesensory aphasiaophthalmoplegic encephalopathy‘Sejunction’
Type
Historical
Information
Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1991 , pp. 172
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Geschwind, H. Carl Wernicke, the Breslau School, and the history of aphasia. In: Carterette, EC, editor. Brain Function. Vol III. Speech, Language and communication. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.Google Scholar
2.Liepmann, H. Wernicke, Carl. In: Kirchoff, T, editor. Deutsche Irrenarzte. Berlin. Springer. 1922. Vol. II pp.238–250.Google Scholar
3.Scharfetter, C. The historical development of the concept of schizophrenia. In: Lader, MH, editor. Studies in schizophrenia. Brit J Psychiat Special publication no.10. Ashford, Kent: Headley Bros, 1975: 5–9.Google Scholar
4.Goldstein, K. Wernicke, Carl [1848-1905]. In: Haymaker, W, Schiller, F, editors. The founders of neurology. 2nd ed. Springfield, III: Thomas, 1970.Google Scholar
5.Hill, D. The bridge between neurology and psychiatry. Lancet 1964; 1: 509–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar