Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:50:52.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Aharonov Ruling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2014

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Cases
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and The Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bank Otzar Hachayal v. Aharonov 53(4) P.D. 199Google Scholar.

2 23 L.S.I. (1968-1969), 283.

3 Boker v. Anglo-Israeli Company for Management and Liability 25(2) P.D. 121.

4 Stern v. Stern 22(2) P.D. 36.

5 Aharonov case, supra n. 1, at 226.

6 “Where a person has undertaken to effect a transaction in immovable property, and before it is completed by registration he undertakes towards another person to effect a conflicting transaction, the right of the party to the first transaction shall prevail; Provided that if the party to the second transaction has acted in good faith and for consideration, and such transaction is registered while he is still in good faith, his right shall prevail”.

7 25 L.S.I. (1970-1971) 175.

8 Aharonov case, supra n. 1, at 240.

9 Ibid., at 235.

10 Ibid., at 278-279, 288.

11 Ibid., at 236-237.

12 Ibid., at 288.

13 The Attorney General's Representative in the General Custodian's office v. Hartfeld 49(3) P.D. 854.

14 21 L.S.I. (1966-1967) 44.