No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2016
1 25 L.S.I. 11.
2 27 L.S.I. 117.
3 We mention here only a few of them published in English: “Remedies on Anticipatory Breach” (1973) 8 Is.L.R. 123Google Scholar; “Comments on Contracts (General Part) Law, 1973” (1974) 9 Is.L.R. 274Google Scholar; “Exemption Clauses and Third Parties in English and Israeli Law” (1978) 13 Is.L.R. 474Google Scholar; “From Common Law to Independence: Supreme Court Decisions on Contract Law in 1975” (1976) 2 T.A.U. Studies in Law 33Google Scholar; “The Validity of Clauses Excluding or Limiting Liability” in Israeli Reports to the Ninth International Congress of Comparative Law (Jerusalem, 1974) 43Google Scholar; “Third Party Beneficiary: a Comparative Analysis” (1976) 11 Is.L.R. 315Google Scholar; “Administrative Contracts” (1979) 14 Is.L.R. 444Google Scholar; “Unenforceable Contracts and Unjusticiable Contracts” (1986) 21 Is.L.R. 425Google Scholar; “Government Contracts in Israel” (1988) 15 Public Control Law J. 34Google Scholar; “The Pre-Contractual Process under Israeli Law” in Israeli Reports to the XIII International Congress of Comparative Law (Jerusalem, 1990) 15Google Scholar.
4 Weil, A., Terré, Fr., Droit civil, Lea obligations (Dalloz, , 4th ed., 1986) 432Google Scholar.
5 Treitel, G. H., Remedies for Breach of Contract, A Comparative Account (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988) 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 Yadin, U., Contracts (Remedies for Breach of Contract) Law (Jerusalem, 2nd ed., 1975, in Hebrew) 75Google Scholar.
7 Golan v. Farkash (1980) 34(i) P.D. 813, at 821, 823.
8 In French textbooks the characteristics of standard contracts are treated in the framework of general contract law. See A. Weil, Fr. Terre, supra n. 4, at 91; Carbonnier, J., Droit civil: Les obligations (Presse Universitaire de France, 13th ed., 1988) 75Google Scholar. For German textbooks on obligations see: Larenz, K., Schuldrecht, vols. I & II (C. H. Beck Verlagsbuchhandlung, Munich, 13th ed., 1982)Google Scholar in which there are frequent references to standard contracts and a special subchapter on standard contracts, and Fikentscher, W., Schuldrecht (W de G, Berlin, 1985)Google Scholar. As to government (administrative) contracts, these are treated as part of administrative law in both German and French law. Although in French law they are treated separately, they are not considered to be cut off from civil contracts since they are governed to some extent by the provisions of the civil code. See de Laubadère, A., Traité des contrats administratifs, vol. I (Paris, 2nd ed., 1983) 532Google Scholar. In some English textbooks, contracts made by the Crown and by public authorities are dealt with within contract law: see Anson's, Law of Contract (Oxford, 25th ed., 1979) 201–206Google Scholar.
9 37 L.S.I. 6.
10 Shalev, G., Exemption Clauses (The Harry Sacher Institute for Legislative Research and Comparative Law, Jerusalem, 1974, in Hebrew)Google Scholar.
11 Shalev, G., Government Contracts in Israel (Avishor Publication Ltd., Jerusalem, 1985, in Hebrew)Google Scholar. For a review in English of this book see (1986) 21 Is.L.R. 93–103Google Scholar.