No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2016
The petitioner, a member of the Likud central committee, moved the High Court of Justice to set aside a coalition agreement of April 11, 1990, between the Likud and a Knesset faction known as the Movement for the Promotion of the Zionist Idea. The agreement, regulating the relationship between the two bodies in parliamentary elections and in the Knesset, also provides that the Likud will have no monetary claims against the faction, and that the future expenses of their joint list in the Knesset will be shared according to their respective strengths.
The petitioner contended that the agreement is illegal and against public policy.
1 Neiman et al. v. Chairman of the Central Committee for the Elections to the 11th Knesset (1985) 39(ii) P.D. 225; 8 S.J. 83.
2 Ressler v. Minister of Defence (1988) 42(ii) P.D. 441.
3 27 L.S.I. 117, at 122.
4 Shalit v. Peres (1990) 44(iii) P.D. 353.
5 34 L.S.I. 181.