Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:41:28.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidentialization and the politics of coalition: lessons from Germany and Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2015

Thomas Poguntke  and
Paul Webb
Thomas Poguntke
Affiliation:
Sozialwissenschaftliches Institut, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany
Paul Webb*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
*
*E-mails: poguntke@hhu.de, p.webb@sussex.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

presidentializationpersonalizationcoalition politics
Type
Research Article
Information
Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 45 , Special Issue 3: The Personal Leader in Contemporary Party Politics , November 2015 , pp. 249 - 275
Copyright
© Società Italiana di Scienza Politica 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, K., Blais, A. and Schmitt, H. (eds) (2011), Political Leaders and Democratic Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ashcroft (2015), ‘Post vote day poll, 7 May 2015’. Retrieved 12 June 2015 from http://lordashcroftpolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/LORD-ASHCROFT-POLLS-Post-vote-poll-summary1.pdf.Google Scholar
Aylott, N. (2005), ‘“President Persson” – how did Sweden get him?’, in T. Poguntke and P. Webb (eds), The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–203.Google Scholar
Bale, T. and Webb, P. (2011), ‘The Conservatives’, in John Bartle and Nicholas Allen (eds), Britain at the Polls 2010, London: Sage Publications, pp. 37–62.Google Scholar
Bale, T. (2015), Five Year Mission: The Labour Party Under Ed Miliband, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennister, M. and Heffernan, R. (2012), ‘Cameron as prime minister: the intra-executive politics of Britain’s coalition government’, Parliamentary Affairs 65(4): 778–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, A. (2011), Platform or Personality? The Role of Party Leaders in Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boffey, D., Helm, T. and Cowburn, A. (2015), ‘Britain set to face weeks of political paralysis after election poll’, The Observer, 2 May.Google Scholar
Burch, M. and Holliday, I. (1999), ‘The Prime Minister’s and Cabinet Offices: an executive office in all but name’, Parliamentary Affairs 52(1): 32–45.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (2010), Coalition Agreement on Stability and Reform, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Calise, M. (1994), ‘The Italian presidency: beyond president and parliament’, Political Science Quarterly 109: 441–460.Google Scholar
Carter, E., Luther, K.R. and Poguntke, T. (2007), ‘European Integration and Internal Party Dynamics’, in Poguntke, T., N. Aylott, E. Carte, R. Ladrech and K.R. Luther (eds), The Europeanization of National Political Parties: Power and Organizational Adaptation, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, E. and Poguntke, T. (2010), ‘How does European integration change national political parties?’, West European Politics 33(2): 297–324.Google Scholar
Childs, S. and Webb, P. (2012), Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, H.D., Sanders, D., Stewart, M.C. and Whiteley, P. (2004), Political Choice in Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, C. (2011), ‘Explaining Merkel’s autonomy in the grand coalition: personalisation or party organisation?’, German Politics 20(4): 469–485.Google Scholar
Coates, S. and Elliott, F. (2015), ‘Cameron backs down as MPs revolt over Europe’, The Times, 9 June.Google Scholar
Costa-Lobo, M. and Curtice, J. (2014), Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowley, P. and Stuart, M. (2011), ‘A coalition with wobbly wings: backbench dissent since May 2010’. Retrieved 12 June 2015 from http://www.revolts.co.uk/Wobbly%20Wings.pdf.Google Scholar
Crossman, R.H.S. (1985), ‘“Introduction” to Walter Bagehot The English Constitution. London: Watts. Reprinted’, in A.S. King (ed.) The British Prime Minister, London: Macmillan, pp. 175–194.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and Andersen, R. (2005), ‘The impact of party leaders: how Blair lost labour votes’, in P. Norris and C. Wlezien (eds) Britain Votes 2005, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 162–180.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (1994), ‘Presidentialization as Americanization? The rise and fall of leader-dominated governmental strategies in the eighties’, American Studies International 32: 51–65.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2007), ‘The semi-sovereign American prince: the dilemma of an independent president in a presidential government’, in T. Poguntke and P. Webb (eds), The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 313–335.Google Scholar
Foley, M. (1993), The Rise of the British Presidency, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Garzia, D. (2014), Personalization of Politics and Electoral Change, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goetz, K.H. (2008), ‘Governance as path to government’, West European Politics 31: 258–279.Google Scholar
Greenberg-Quinlan-Rosler (2015), ‘UK Post-Election Poll for the TUC’. Retrieved 12 June 2015 from http://www.gqrr.com/uk-post-election-1.Google Scholar
Heffernan, R. (2003), ‘Prime ministerial predominance? Core executive politics in the UK’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(3): 347–372.Google Scholar
Heffernan, R. and Webb, P. (2005), ‘The British prime minister: much more than “first among equals”’, in T. Poguntke and P. Webb (eds), The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 26–62.Google Scholar
Heinze, R.G. (2000), Die Berliner Räterepublik, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Helms, L. (2002), ‘Chief executives’ and their parties: the case of Germany’, German Politics 11(2): 146–164.Google Scholar
Holtmann, E. and Voelzkow, H. (2000), Zwischen Wettbewerbs- und Verhandlungsdemokratie, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, D., Koss, M. and Olsen, J. (2007), The Left Party in Contemporary German Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. (1990), ‘Mrs. Thatcher and the power of the prime minister’, Contemporary Record 3: 2–6.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (2008), Cameron on Cameron, London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
Karvonen, L. (2010), The Personalization of Politics, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Knoll, T. (2004), Das Bonner Bundeskanzleramt von 1949–1999, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. (2012), ‘Personalization of election campaigns’, Party Politics 18(6): 825–844.Google Scholar
Ladrech, R. (2007), ‘National political parties and European governance: the consequences of “missing in action”’, West European Politics 30(5): 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, A. and Riese, D. (2015), ‘Päferenzkonflikte und krisenmanagement. Die innen- und rechtspolitik der schwarz-gelben koalition’, in R. Zohlnhöfer and T. Saalfeld (eds), Politik im Schatten der Krise. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel 2009–2013, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 493–519.Google Scholar
Maer, L. and Faulkner, E. (2015), Special Advisers: Briefing Paper 03813, London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
Maier, J. and Faas, T. (2011), ‘“Miniature campaigns” in comparison: the German televised debates, 2002–2009’, German Politics 20(1): 75–91.Google Scholar
Mayntz, R. (1980), ‘Executive leadership in Germany: dispersion of power or “Kanzlerdemokratie”?’, in R. Rose and E. Suleiman (eds) Presidents and Prime Ministers, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, pp. 139–170.Google Scholar
Mughan, A. (2015), ‘Parties, conditionality and leader effects in parliamentary elections’, Party Politics 21(1): 28–39.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F. (1994), ‘The Chancellor and his staff’, in S. Padgett (eds), Adenauer to Kohl. The Development of the German Chancellorship, London: Hurst & Co, pp. 106–126.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F. (1997), ‘Federal republic of Germany: a system of chancellor government’, in J. Blondel and F. Müller-Rommel (eds), Cabinets in Western Europe, London: Macmillan, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, F. (2000), ‘Management of politics in the German chancellor’s office’, in G.B. Peters, R.A.W. Rhodes and V. Wright (eds), Administering the Summit. Administration of the Core Executive in Developed Countries, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 81–110.Google Scholar
Murswieck, A. (2015), ‘Politische führung von bundeskanzlerin merkel in der christlich-liberalen koalition’, in R. Zohlnhöfer and T. Saalfeld (eds), Politik im Schatten der Krise. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel 2009–2013, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, F. (2010), ‘There is no cabinet rift on benefit reform’, Spectator Coffee House. Retrieved 2 August from http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2010/08/there-is-no-cabinet-rift-on-benefit-reform/.Google Scholar
Niclauß, K. (1988), Kanzlerdemokratie. Bonner Regierungspraxis von Konrad Adenauer bis Helmut Kohl, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Niedermayer, O. (ed.) (2009), Die Parteien nach der Bundestagswahl 2005, Wiesbaden: Verlag.Google Scholar
Norton, P. (2005), ‘The conservative party: the politics of panic’, in J. Bartle and A. King (eds) Britain at the Polls 2005, Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar
Padgett, S. (1994a), Adenauer to Kohl. The Development of the German Chancellorship, London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Padgett, S. (1994b), Introduction: chancellors and the chancellorship’, in S. Padgett (ed.), Adenauer to Kohl: The Development of the German Chancellorship, London: Hurst & Co, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Patzelt, W.J. (2004), ‘Chancellor Schröder’s approach to political and legislative leadership’, German Politics 13(2): 268–299.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T. (2002), ‘Germany’, European Journal of Political Research 41(3–4): 959–963.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T. (2005a), Parteien ohne (An)Bindung: Verkümmern die organisatorischen Wurzeln der Parteien?’, in J. Schmid and U. Zolleis (eds), Zwischen Anarchie und Strategie. Der Erfolg von Parteiorganisationen, Wiesbaden: Verlag, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T. (2005b), A presidentialized party state? The federal republic of Germany’, in T. Poguntke and P. Webb (eds), The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–87.Google Scholar
Poguntke, E. (2007), ‘Europeanization in a consensual environment? German political parties and the European Union’, in T. Poguntke, N. Aylott, E. Carter, R. Ladrech and K.R. Luther (eds), The Europeanization of National Political Parties. Power and Organizational Adaptation, London and New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 88–133.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T. (2012), ‘Germany’, European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 117–121.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (2005), The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saalfeld, T. (2003), ‘Germany: multiple veto points, informal coordination, and problems of hidden action’, in K. Strøm, W.C. Müller and T. Bergmann (eds), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–375.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F.W. (1985), ‘Die politikverflechtungsfalle. Europäische integration und deutscher föderalismus in vergleich’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 26(4): 323–356.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Beck, R., Rattinger, H., Roßteutscher, S., Weßels, B. and Wolf, C. (2014), ‘Fazit und ausblick: langeweile und extreme, fragmentierung und konzentration’, in R. Schmitt-Beck and H. Rattinger (eds), Zwischen Fragementierung und Konzentration: Die Bundestagswahl 2013, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 355–367.Google Scholar
Siefken, S.T. (2006), ‘Regierten die kommissionen? Eine bilanz der rot-grünen bundesregierungen 1998 bis 2005’, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 37(1): 559–581.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (1991), ‘The resources of a German chancellor’, West European Politics 14(2): 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, N. (2015), ‘George Osborne made first secretary of state in Cabinet reshuffle.’ The Guardian, 8 May.Google Scholar
Webb, P. and Poguntke, T. (2013), ‘The presidentialization of politics thesis defended’, Parliamentary Affairs 66(3): 646–654.Google Scholar
Wright, O. (2011), ‘So what exactly have the Liberal Democrats done since they took power?’ The Independent. Retrieved 20 September 2015 from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/so-what-exactly-have-the-liberal-democrats-done-since-they-took-power-2357480.html.Google Scholar
Zolleis, U. (2015), ‘Auf die Kanzlerin kommt es an. Die CDU unter Angela Merkel’, in R. Zohlnhöfer and T. Saalfeld (eds), Politik im Schatten der Krise. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Merkel 2009–2013, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 73–91.Google Scholar