Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:11:36.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ottoman Chancery's Role in Diplomacy with Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

Selim Güngörürler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study first considers how master secretaries of the Ottoman Imperial Council went beyond their field of scribal business and began to have a share in carrying out the empire's foreign policy by putting it into words. Next, it deals with the specific genre of documents that took shape step by step as one chancery office worked up an incoming writ and forwarded it to another bureau. It thereby shows how we can indeed unearth new knowledge on political history by looking into these outputs of the chancery's practice of writing and keeping financial transactions between dignitaries, superintendents, petitioners, and departments. The study then tackles in what ways one can link these trends to the early modern growth of the chancery and the branching out in government, and how the state's lordship rights and making, as well as keeping, logs were understood in those times. A document belonging to the handled genre is reproduced, transcribed, and translated at the end.

Keywords

chancerydiplomaticspalaeographyearly modernOttoman EmpireSafavid Iran
Type
Article
Information
Itinerario , Volume 44 , Special Issue 3: Beyond the Islamicate Chancery: Archives, Paperwork, and Textual Encounters Across Eurasia , December 2020 , pp. 572 - 590
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Research Institute for History, Leiden University

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Dr. Selim Güngörürler is a research fellow at the Institute of Iranian Studies of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. His work deals with early modern Ottoman diplomacy, diplomatics, and palaeography, while his ongoing research focuses on Ottoman–Safavid relations. For consistency and convenience, transcription from Ottoman Turkish follows the rules of modern Turkish spelling, notwithstanding whether a word is of Turkic, Persian, or Arabic stock. But whereas today's practice seldom distinguishes long vowels from short ones in writing, they are often marked here with a circumflex, again for convenience.

References

Bibliography

Efendi, Ahmed Resmî. Hadîkatü’r-Rüesâ, Süleymâniye Yazma Eser Kütüphanesi, Lâleli, n. 2092m.Google Scholar
Münşeat 1050–1140. Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Ottoman Archives, Hs. or. oct. 893 (part II).Google Scholar
Nazmizâde, Murtezâ Efendi. Münşeat-ı Nazmizâde. Süleymâniye Yazma Eser Kütüphanesi, Esad Efendi, n. 3322.Google Scholar
Ottoman Archives [OA], Directorate of Presidential Archives, Istanbul. Referenced collections:Google Scholar
Ali Emîrî—II. AhmedGoogle Scholar
Ali Emîrî—II. MustafaGoogle Scholar
Ali Emîrî—III. AhmedGoogle Scholar
Cevdet—HâriciyeGoogle Scholar
İbnülemin—HâriciyeGoogle Scholar
Mühimme DefterleriGoogle Scholar
Nâme-i Hümâyun DefterleriGoogle Scholar
Râmî, Mehmed [Efendi/Paşa]. Münşeat. Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, H.O. 179.Google Scholar
Abdullah Efendi, Sarı and Çelebi, Cevrî İbrâhim. Düstûrü’l-İnşâ. Süleymâniye Yazma Eser Kütüphanesi, Nûr-ı Osmânye, n. 4304.Google Scholar
Üsküdârî, Abdullah b. İbrâhim. Vaakıât-ı Rûzmerre, tome 3. Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Revan, n. 1225.Google Scholar
Efendi, Ahmed Resmî. Hadîkatü’r-Rüesâ, Süleymâniye Yazma Eser Kütüphanesi, Lâleli, n. 2092m.Google Scholar
Münşeat 1050–1140. Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Ottoman Archives, Hs. or. oct. 893 (part II).Google Scholar
Nazmizâde, Murtezâ Efendi. Münşeat-ı Nazmizâde. Süleymâniye Yazma Eser Kütüphanesi, Esad Efendi, n. 3322.Google Scholar
Ottoman Archives [OA], Directorate of Presidential Archives, Istanbul. Referenced collections:Google Scholar
Ali Emîrî—II. AhmedGoogle Scholar
Ali Emîrî—II. MustafaGoogle Scholar
Ali Emîrî—III. AhmedGoogle Scholar
Cevdet—HâriciyeGoogle Scholar
İbnülemin—HâriciyeGoogle Scholar
Mühimme DefterleriGoogle Scholar
Nâme-i Hümâyun DefterleriGoogle Scholar
Râmî, Mehmed [Efendi/Paşa]. Münşeat. Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, H.O. 179.Google Scholar
Abdullah Efendi, Sarı and Çelebi, Cevrî İbrâhim. Düstûrü’l-İnşâ. Süleymâniye Yazma Eser Kütüphanesi, Nûr-ı Osmânye, n. 4304.Google Scholar
Üsküdârî, Abdullah b. İbrâhim. Vaakıât-ı Rûzmerre, tome 3. Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi Kütüphanesi, Revan, n. 1225.Google Scholar

Published Primary Sources

Efendi, Abdülkadir. Topçular Kâtibi Abdülkadir (Kadri) Efendi Târihi. Ed. Yılmazer, Ziyâ. 2 vols. Ankara: Türk Târih Kurumu, 2003.Google Scholar
Anonim Osmanlı Târihi (1099–1116 / 1688–1704). Ed. Özcan, Abdülkadir. Ankara: Türk Târih Kurumu, 2000.Google Scholar
[Bedreddinzâde, Ali b. Osman. Kaaime, published in] Kırzıoğlu, Fahrettin, ed. “Kaa'ime, h. 1117–135 (1705–1723) (Çökmekte olan İran—Safavî Devleti'nde Afgan sülâlesi hâkimiyeti, Şirvan ile Dağıstan sünnîlerinin istiklâli ve Moskof çarı I. Petro'nun istilâsı üzerine Osmanlı gizli istihbârâtının özeti).” Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Araştırma Dergisi 7 (1976): 87–171, offprint.Google Scholar
[Dürrî, Ahmed Efendi. İran Elçiliği Takrîri. Published in] Ürkündağ, Ayhan, “Dürrî Ahmed Efendi'nin İran Sefaretnamesi.” MA thesis, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, 2006.Google Scholar
Evliyâ Çelebi, b. Derviş Mehemmed Zıllî. Evliyâ Çelebi Seyahatnâmesi. 2 vols. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2011.Google Scholar
[Fındıklılı Silahdar Mehmed Ağa. Zeyl-i Fezleke. Published in] Türkal, Nazire Karaçay, “Silahdar Fındıklılı Mehmed Ağa, Zeyl-i Fezleke (1065—22. Ca. 1066 / 1654—7 Şubat 1695).” PhD diss., Marmara Üniversitesi, 2012.Google Scholar
Naîmâ, Mustafa Efendi. Târih-i Na’îmâ. Ed. İpşirli, Mehmet. Ankara: Türk Târih Kurumu, 2007.Google Scholar
Nasîrî, Muhammed İbrâhim b. Zeynelâbidîn. Düstûr-i Şehriyârân. Ed. Nasîrî Mukaddem, Muhammed Nâdir. Tahran: Bünyâd-ı Mevkûfât-ı Doktor Mahmûd Afşar, hs. 1373.Google Scholar
Nazmi-zâde, Murtezâ [Efendi]. Gülşen-i Hulefâ: Bağdat Târihi 762–1717. Ed. Karataş, Mehmet. Ankara: Türk Târih Kurumu, 2014.Google Scholar
[Nazmizâde, Murtezâ Efendi]. “Nusret-nâme'nin Kaynaklarından Târih-i Sefer-i Basra.” Ed. Çubuk, Vahid. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Târih Enstitüsü Dergisi 15 (1995): 321–80.Google Scholar
Râşid, Mehmed Efendi, and Âsım Efendi, Çelebizâde İsmâil. Târih-i Râşid ve Zeyli. Ed. Özcan, Abdülkadir, Uğur, Yunus, Çakır, Baki, Zeki İzgöer, Ahmet. İstanbul: Klasik, 2013.Google Scholar
Mehmed Paşa, Sarı. Zübde-i Vekâiyât: Tahlil ve Metin (1066–1116 / 1656–1704). Ed. Özcan, Abdülkadir. Ankara: Türk Târih Kurumu, 1995.Google Scholar
[Teşrifâtizâde, Mehmed Efendi. Defter-i Teşrifat. Published in] Mercan, Halil. “Teşrifâtîzâde Mehmed Efendi'nin Defter-i Teşrifâtı” (Transkripsiyonu ve Değerlendirilmesi).” MA thesis, Erciyes Üniversitesi, 1996.Google Scholar
Uşşakizâde, İbrâhim Hasîb Efendi. Uşşakizâde Târihi. Ed. 2 vols. Gündoğdu, Raşit. İstanbul: Çamlıca Basım Yayın, 2005.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abou-el-Haj, Rifa'at. “Ottoman Diplomacy at Karlowitz.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 87 (1967): 498–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahıshalı, Recep. Osmanlı Devlet Teşkilâtında Reisülküttablık, XVIII. Yüzyıl. İstanbul: Tatav Yayınları, 2001.Google Scholar
Ahıshalı, Recep. “Râmî Mehmed Paşa.” Türkiye Diyânet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi 34 (2007): 449–51.Google Scholar
Aksan, Virginia. An Ottoman Statesman in War and Peace: Ahmed Resmi Efendi 1700–1783. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Aktepe, Münir. 1720–1724 Osmanlı-İran Münâsebetleri ve Silahşör Kemânî Mustafa Ağa'nın Revan Fetih-Nâmesi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Matbaası, 1970.Google Scholar
Azamat, Nihat. “Sarı Abdullah Efendi.” Türkiye Diyânet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi 36 (2009): 145–7.Google Scholar
Faroqhi, Suraiya. “An Ottoman Ambassador in Iran: Dürrî Ahmed Efendi and the Collapse of the Safavid Empire in 1720–1721.” In Wahrnehmung des Fremden, Differenzerfahrungen von Diplomaten in Europa (1500–1648), ed. Rohrschneider, Michael and Strohmeyer, Arno, 375–98. Münster: Aschendorrf, 2007.Google Scholar
Fekete, Lajos. Die Siyâqat-Schrift in der Türkischen Finanzverwaltung. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 1955.Google Scholar
Günday, Dündar. Arşiv Belgelerinde Siyakat Yazısı Özellikleri ve Divan Rakamları. Ankara: Türk Târih Kurumu, 1974.Google Scholar
Güngörürler, Selim. “Diplomacy and Political Relations between the Ottoman Empire and Safavid Iran, 1639–1722.” PhD diss., Georgetown University, 2016.Google Scholar
Güngörürler, Selim. “Fraternity, Perpetual Peace, and Alliance in Ottoman–Safavid Relations, 1688–1698: A Diplomatic Revolution in the Middle East.” Turcica 50 (2019): 145–207.Google Scholar
Güngörürler, Selim. “Fundamentals of Ottoman-–Safavid Peacetime Relations, 1639–1722.” Turkish Historical Review 9 (2018): 151–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İnalcık, Halil. “The Appointment Procedure of a Guild Warden (Ketkhudâ),” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 76 (1986): 135–42.Google Scholar
Itzkowitz, Norman. “Eighteenth-Century Ottoman Realities.” Studia Islamica 16 (1962): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerslake, Celia. “Celâlzâde Mustafa Çelebi.” Türkiye Diyânet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi 7 (1993): 260–2.Google Scholar
Kolodziejczyk, Dariusz. Ottoman–Polish Diplomatic Relations (15th-18th Century): An Annotated Edition of ‘Ahdnames and Other Documents. Leiden: Brill, 2000.Google Scholar
Külbilge, İlker. “18. Yüzyılın İlk Yarısında Osmanlı-İran Siyâsî İlişkileri (1703–1747).” PhD diss., Ege Üniversitesi, 2010.Google Scholar
Kumru, Coşkun. “Koca Nişancı Celâlzâde Mustafa Çelebi ve Eserlerine Toplu Bir Bakış.” Mediterranean Journal of Humanities 4 (2014): 201–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Süreyyâ, Mehmed. Sicill-i Osmânî. Ed. Akbayar, Nuri and Kahraman, Seyit Ali. 6 vols. İstanbul: Târih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 1996.Google Scholar
Römer, Claudia. Osmanische Festungsbesatzungen in Ungarn zur Zeit Murads III. Dargestellt anhand von Petitionen zur Stellenvergabe. Österreichische Akademia der Wissenschaften: Wien, 1995.Google Scholar