Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:14:26.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political economy of free trade agreements in China, Japan, and South Korea: sectoral politics of the FTA wave, 1998–2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

Youngmi Choi Open the ORCID record for Youngmi Choi [Opens in a new window]
Youngmi Choi*
Affiliation:
Chonnam National University, #254, Social Science Bldg. 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju61186, Korea
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: ymchoi@jnu.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the different impacts of the determinants of free trade agreements (FTAs) based on the stage of the FTA discussions. By disaggregating the FTA formation process into four stages, this study finds that the influence of industry interest groups has a positive impact on FTA formation in the first stage, when two countries initiate the discussion by establishing a joint study. In contrast, it has a negative impact in the last stage, when signed FTAs need to be ratified in order to enter into force. Political institutions emphasized in the existing studies are likely to be significant in the initial stages, but lose their significance as the process moves forward. The findings of this study collectively support the hypothesis that a given FTA is the result of sectoral politics where interests and the power of industries have a significant influence on trade policy decision-making.

Keywords

Free trade agreementsindustry interest groupsNortheast Asia
Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 145 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buszynski, L (2009) Sino-Japanese relations: interdependence, rivalry and regional security. Contemporary Southeast Asia 31, 143–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y (2013) The optimal path of a China–Japan–Korea FTA: multilateral path or sequential path? Pacific Focus 28, 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J (1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88, 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, T and Mansfield, ED (2004) Timing is everything: elections and trade liberalization in the post-communist world. Comparative Political Studies 37, 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, P (1986) Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, J (1994) Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, J and Mansfield, E (1993) Power politics and international trade. American Political Science Review 87, 408–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G and Helpman, E (1995) The politics of free trade agreements. The American Economic Review 85, 667–690.Google Scholar
Henisz, W (2000) The institutional environment for economic growth. Economics and Politics 12, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henisz, W and Mansfield, E (2006) Votes and vetoes: the political determinants of commercial openness. International Studies Quarterly 50, 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastner, S and Kim, SY (2007) Why the rush to bilateral free trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference. Available at http://sykim.weebly.com/uploads/3/3/4/4/3344542/kastnerkimmpsa2008.pdf (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, P (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, E and Reinhardt, E (2003) Multilateral determinants of regionalism: the effects of GATT/WTO on the formation of preferential trading arrangements. International Organization 57, 829–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, E, Milner, H and Rosendorff, B (2002) Why democracies cooperate more: electoral control and international trade agreements. International Organization 56, 477–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, E, Milner, H and Pevehouse, J (2008) Democracy, veto players and the depth of regional integration. The World Economy 31, 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, W (1999) The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, T and Zignago, S (2011) Notes on CEPII's distances measures: The GeoDist database. CEPII Working Paper No. 2011-25, France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, H and Kubota, K (2005) Why the move to free trade? Democracy and trade policy in the developing countries. International Organization 59, 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, M (2009) Political-security competition and the FTA movement: motivations and consequences. In Solis, M, Stallings, B and Katada, S (eds), Competitive Regionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Halloran, S (1994) Politics, Process, and American Trade Policy. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagariya, A (1997) Preferential trading and the myth of natural trading partners. Japan and the World Economy 9, 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R (1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization 42, 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D (1998) Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106, 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, R (1989) Commerce and Coalitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stolper, W and Samuelson, P (1941) Protection and real wages. The Review of Economic Studies 9, 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viner, J (1950) The Customs Union Issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Voeten, E, Strezhnev, A and Bailey, M (2009) United Nations General Assembly Voting Data https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LEJUQZ, Harvard Dataverse, V21, UNF:6:pewd/JMymJQo6lXfbeBmCA== [fileUNF].Google Scholar
Wonnacott, P and Lutz, M (1989) Is there a case for free trade areas? In Schott, J (ed.), Free Trade Areas and US Trade Policy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, pp. 59–84.Google Scholar