Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:24:14.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Early History of the Maravi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

M. D. D. Newitt
Affiliation:
University of Exeter

Extract

This article seeks to re-examine the contemporary evidence about the early history of the Maravi chieftaincies of northern Zambesia. It challenges the view that the Maravi were long established in Zambesia and became aggressive and expansionist in the late sixteenth century when the Portuguese interfered with the ivory trade. Instead it suggests that these chieftaincies were only formed in the second half of the sixteenth and the first half of the seventeenth century by a number of different groups who migrated into the region north of the Zambezi and who conquered the existing population. Some of these intrusive groups crossed the Zambezi and attacked the wealthy Karanga states to the south, but these invasions were frustrated by the Portuguese who blocked all attempts to settle south of the river. Defeated in their efforts, the Maravi chiefs turned aside to invade the Mozambique lowlands. It was one of these incursions that in the 1580s gave rise to the legend of the marauding, cannibal Zimba.

The establishment of settled Maravi states occurred only as a result of the rise of Muzura in the first half of the seventeenth century. He defeated his rivals with Portuguese aid but was, in his turn, frustrated in his attempts to interfere in Karangaland, and in the end was badly defeated by the Portuguese in 1632. Thereafter he concentrated his activity on developing the ivory trade with the Portuguese on the Zambezi and in Mozambique Island, while the region south of the Zambezi became subject to Portuguese warlords and the trade monopoly of the captain of Mozambique.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Alpers, E. A., Ivory and Slaves in East Central Africa (London, 1975).Google Scholar The extracts are taken from pages 46–9 and page 53.

2 Alpers, E. A. and Ehret, C., ‘Eastern Africa’, Cambridge History of Africa, iv (Cambridge, 1975), 517.Google Scholar

3 Alpers, , Ivory and Slaves, 47.Google Scholar

4 Schoffeleers, J. M., ‘Symbolic and social aspects of spirit worship among the Mang'anja’ (D.Phil, thesis, Oxford University, 1968), 104.Google Scholar

5 Hafkin, N., ‘Trade, society and politics in northern Mozambique’ (Ph.D. thesis, Boston University, 1973), 10.Google Scholar The authority she gives is Schoffeleers, whose own authority is Alpers. See note 4 above.

6 Alpers, E. A., ‘The Mutapa and Malawi political systems’, in Ranger, T. O. (ed.), Aspects of Central African History (London, 1968), 19.Google Scholar

7 Langworthy, H., ‘A history of Undi's kingdom to 1890: aspects of Chewa history in East Central Africa’ (Ph.D. thesis, Boston University, 1969), 126.Google Scholar

8 Abraham, D.P., ‘Tasks in the field of early history’ (revised), cyclostyled in Conference on the History of the Central African Peoples (Rhodes–Livingstone Institute, Lusaka, 1963).Google Scholar

9 Abraham's footnote in fact says: ‘… Informants from the Pimbi section of the a Maravi living in P.E.A. east of Mount Darwin District have explicitly stated to me that in their opinion the vaMbire of Southern Rhodesia are their clan-fellows, but are unable to demonstrate the connection genealogically…’.

10 Langworthy, , ‘A History of Undi's kingdom’, 117, 126.Google ScholarPhiri, K., in his thesis ‘Chewa history in Central Malawi and the use of oral tradition, 1600–1020’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, 1975)Google Scholar has on page 52 the magnificently enigmatic remark ‘It is now apparent that Kalonga's kingdom was established some time before or after 1480’.

11 Alpers, , Ivory and Slaves, 66, n. 24.Google Scholar

12 de Monclaro, Francisco, S.J., ‘Relação da Viagem Q Fizerão os Pes da Companhia de Jesus com Franco Barretto na Conquista de Monomotapa no anno de 1569’, in Theal, G. M. (ed.), Records of South Eastern Africa (9 vols., Cape Town, 18981903; reprinted Cape Town 1964), iii, 226.Google Scholar

13 Alpers, , Ivory and Slaves, 47.Google Scholar

14 Alpers, and Ehret, , ‘Eastern Africa’, 517.Google Scholar

15 Langworthy, , ‘A History of Undi's kingdom’, 165, 166.Google Scholar

16 Axelson, E., Portuguese in South East Africa, 1488–1600 (Johannesburg, 1973), 137.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., 135.

18 E.g. Ibid. 144, 149, 150, 167, etc.

19 Alpers, , Ivory and Slaves, 47.Google Scholar

20 Ibid. 49.

22 Langworthy, , ‘A History of Undi's kingdom’, 166.Google Scholar

23 Lupi, Eduardo do Couto, Angoche – Breve Memória sobre uma das capitanias-mores do distrito de Moçambique (Lisbon, 1907).Google Scholar This book is discussed also in Hafkin, ‘Trade, society and polities’, 14.

24 There are major problems about the identification of Muzura which are discussed below.

25 de Monclaro, Francisco S.J., ‘Relação da Viagem…’ is published in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iii, 157253Google Scholar, and in Documents on the Portuguese in Mozambique and Central Africa, viii (Lisbon, 1975), 324429.Google Scholar

26 dos Santos, João, Ethiopia Oriental (Evora, 1609).Google Scholar Extracts in Theal, (ed.), Records…, vii, 1370.Google Scholar

27 Bocarro, António, ‘Decada da India’. Extracts printed in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iii, 254435.Google Scholar

28 Luis Mariano, S.J., letter of 1624 printed in German translation with a commentary in Schurhammer, G., ‘Die Entdeckung des Niassa-Sees’, Stimmen der Zeit, xcix (1920), 349–56.Google Scholar The original is reproduced in Beccari, C. (ed.), Rerum Aethiopicarum, xii (Rome, 1912), 112–14.Google Scholar

29 Gomes, António, ‘Viagem que fez o Padre Ant° Gomes, da Compa de Jesus, ao Imperio de Manomotapa; e a assistencia que fez nas ditas terras de algus annos’, edited by Axelson, E., Studio, iii (1959), 155242.Google Scholar

30 Extracts from Couto's writings concerning East Africa are printed in Theal, (ed.), Records…, vi, 307410.Google Scholar

31 The earliest map which purports to give information about the peoples of the lower Zambezi is that attributed to Bartolomeu Velho and dated 1561. This map has been reproduced and discussed by Randies, W. G. L., ‘South East Africa and the Empire of Monomotapa as shown on selected printed maps of the 16th Century’, Studia, ii (1958), 149–70Google Scholar and in Cortesão, Armando and da Mota, Avelino Teixeira, Portugaliae Monumenta Cartographica, 6 vols. (Lisbon, 1960).Google Scholar This map clearly marks the name Mozimba and, if taken at face value, this would suggest that the Zimba were already in situ and known to the Portuguese at least by 1561. There are, however, problems with this map which should not be ignored. Randies has rightly pointed out that the only known map with similar nomenclature is Pigafetta's map of 1591 but, he says, ‘Pigafetta had no direct knowledge of Bartolomeu Velho's world map…’ (p. 160). Nor, indeed, did other cartographers or Velho himself, who includes this information on none of his other maps. One explanation might be that these names were added to Velho's map after the publication of Pigafetta's map by some unknown hand. This is suggested by the way in which the names have been written over internal geographical features and over other names. Moreover, the inclusion of ‘Benguella’ alongside ‘Angola’ in letters indicating that it is a province or kingdom suggests strongly that this name at least was added after the founding of the Portuguese captaincy of Benguella in 1607. In general, therefore, not too much reliance should be placed on this map as evidence for the presence of the Zimba in Zambesia before 1561.

32 Monclaro, , ‘Relação…’ in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iii, 220, 234.Google Scholar

33 Nurse, G. T., ‘The people of Bororo: a lexicostatistical study’, in Pachai, B. (ed.), The Early History of Malawi (London, 1972), 123–35.Google Scholar

34 Isaacman, Allen, The Tradition of Resistance in Mozambique (London, 1976), 4.Google Scholar

35 Santos says that Mongaze was the name of the chief; see ‘Ethiopia Oriental’ in Theal, (ed.), Records…, vii, 263.Google Scholar

36 Monclaro, , ‘Relação…’, in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iii, 238–9.Google Scholar

37 Schoffeleers, J. M., ‘M'Bona the guardian spirit of the Manganja’ (B.Litt. thesis, Oxford, 1966), 58.Google Scholar

38 Couto in Theal, (ed.), Records…, vi, 393.Google Scholar

40 Miller, Joseph, ‘Requiem for the Jaga’, Cahiers d'Etudes Africaines, xiii (1973), 121–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For criticism of Miller's article see Hilton, Anne, ‘The Jaga reconsidered’, Journal of African History, xxiii (1981), 191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 King to viceroy, Lisbon 31 Jan. 1602 and 26 Feb. 1602 in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iv, 50, 51.Google Scholar

42 Santos, in Theal, (ed.), Records…, vii, 290–1.Google Scholar

43 Alpers, , Ivory and Slaves, 49.Google Scholar

44 Gomes, , ‘Viagem…’, Studia, iii (1959), 184.Google Scholar

45 Santos, in Theal, (ed.), Records…, vii, 299304.Google Scholar

46 Miller, ‘Requiem for the Jaga’. Steven Feierman has proposed that the Zimba of Mombasa, at least, should be understood in terms of local political relations and not as an intrusive group. See Curtin, P. D., Feierman, S., Thompson, L. and Vansina, J., African History (London, 1978), 177.Google Scholar

47 Phiri, , ‘Chewa History…’, 49.Google Scholar

48 Alpers, , Ivory and Slaves, 49.Google Scholar

49 Alpers, and Ehret, , ‘Eastern Africa’, 517.Google Scholar

50 Santos, in Theal, (ed.), Records…, vii, 299.Google Scholar

51 Axelson, , Portuguese in South-East Africa, 1488–1600, 176–7.Google Scholar

52 Bocarro, in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iii, 361–4.Google Scholar

53 Bocarro, Ibid. 363.

54 Santos, for instance, describes the fortified camp of the Zimba in this way; ‘a strong double pallisade of wood, with its ramparts and loopholes for arrows, surrounded by a very deep and wide trench within which the enemy were most defiant’. Theal, (ed.), Records…, vii, 294.Google Scholar

55 For example, Langworthy, , ‘A History of Undi's Kingdom’, 169.Google Scholar

56 Gomes, , ‘Viagem…’, Studia, iii, 199.Google Scholar Abraham first drew particular attention to this passage in ‘Tasks in the Field of Early History’.

57 See accounts in Langworthy, , ‘A History of Undi's kingdom’, 167–8Google Scholar and Alpers, , Ivory and Slaves, 53–4.Google Scholar

58 See the account of Gaspar Bocarro's journey of 1616 in António Bocarro in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iii, 417Google Scholar and Barretto, Manuel, S.J., ‘Report upon the State and Conquest of the Rivers of Cuama’, in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iii, 436508.Google Scholar

59 de Rezende, Pedro Barretto, ‘Extract from the Book entitled of the State of India’ in Theal, (ed.), Records…, ii, 407.Google Scholar

60 Gatsi Lusere to Nuno Alvares Pereira, 4 June 1620, printed in da Silva Rego, A. (ed.), Documentos Remittidos da India, vii (Lisbon, 1975), 322, 324Google Scholar; Axelson, E., Portuguese in South East Africa 1600–1700 (Johannesburg, 1960), 67.Google Scholar

61 Cacegas, Luis (‘Extracts from a History of the Order of Saint Dominic’, in Theal, (ed.), Records…, 1, 399)Google Scholar says that the army raised by the Portuguese for the defeat of Kaparidze was obtained ‘from the other side of the river’. However, this account was written only in 1767 and contemporary sources only say that they were vassals of the Portuguese. See Axelson, , Portuguese in South East Africa 1600–1700, 70.Google Scholar

62 Francisco de Lucena to the king, n.d., in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iv, 274–81.Google Scholar

63 See the account of Gaspar Bocarro's journey in António Bocarro, in Theal, (ed.), Records…, iiiGoogle Scholar, and the letter of Mariano. In the Archivo Histórico do Estado da India in Goa (Livros dos Monções, no. 17) is a letter from the king to the viceroy dated 27 February 1633, referring to a letter from the Castellan of Mozambique, Cristovão de Brito e Vasconcellos, which had mentioned ‘the Marave cafres who have conquered a great part of the mainland adjoining Mozambique and have passed on to Mombasa’. Later he mentions the ‘Macuas cafres enemies of the Maraves’. These references might be taken as further evidence for the identification of the Zimba with a section of the Maraves, and they might also be seen as implying a fairly recent Marave occupation of the hinterland of Mozambique.