Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:39:58.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DILEMMAS OF POSTCOLONIAL DIPLOMACY: ZAMBIA, KENNETH KAUNDA, AND THE MIDDLE EAST CRISIS, 1964–73

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2018

LYNN SCHLER
LYNN SCHLER*
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines Zambia's engagement with the Middle East conflict from 1964–73 as a window into the political strategies and ideological ambitions of Kaunda's government in the first decade of independence. At the start of independence, Kaunda's domestic agenda led him to establish ties with Israel and to advance a program for cooperative development based on Israeli technical assistance. However, broader international concerns, filtered through the struggle against white minority regimes in southern Africa, ultimately led Kaunda to embrace a leadership role in international protests against Israel's policies towards its neighboring states. Zambia's foray into Middle East diplomacy in the first decade of independence enables a focused examination of Kaunda's presence in the international arena, while also revealing the compromises he made in the face of conflicting interests. Zambia's role in the Middle East conflict highlights this era as a time of confidence and claim-making by African leaders, but also one of concessions.

Keywords

Zambiasouthern Africadiplomacyideologypostcolonialpoliticsinternational relations
Type
National Struggles and International Diplomacy
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 97 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kaunda, K. D. and Colin, M. M., A Humanist in Africa: Letters to Colin M. Morris from Kenneth D. Kaunda, President of Zambia (London, 1966)Google Scholar.

2 Schwartz, M. and Hare, A. P., Foreign Experts and Unsustainable Development: Transferring Israeli technology to Zambia, Nigeria and Nepal (London, 2000), 91Google Scholar.

3 Gordon, D. M., Invisible Agents: Spirits in a Central African History (Athens, OH, 2012), 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Larmer, M., Hinfelaar, M., Phiri, B. J., Schumaker, L., and Szeftel, M., ‘Introduction: narratives of nationhood’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 40:5 (2014), 895–905Google Scholar; Gordon, Invisible Agents; Gewald, J. B., Hinfelaar, M., and Macola, G. (eds.), One Zambia, Many Histories: Towards a History of Post-Colonial Zambia (Brill, 2008)Google Scholar; Larmer, M., ‘A little bit like a volcano: the United Progressive Party and resistance to one-party rule in Zambia, 1964–1980’, The International Journal of African Historical Studies, 39:1 (2006), 49–83Google Scholar; Macola, G., Liberal Nationalism in Central Africa: A Biography of Harry Mwaanga Nkumbula (Springer, 2010)Google Scholar; Larmer, M., ‘What went wrong? Zambian political biography and post-colonial discourses of decline’, Historia, 51:1 (2006), 235–56 (238)Google Scholar; Fraser, A. and Larmer, M. (eds.), Zambia, Mining, and Neoliberalism: Boom and Bust on the Globalized Copperbelt (New York, 2010)Google Scholar; Ndangwa, N., ‘Good governance and national social development: a Zambian experience’, Social Development Issues, 21 (1999), 70–6 (72)Google Scholar.

5 Gewald, Hinfelaar, and Macola (eds.), One Zambia, 4.

6 Two examples are: Macola, G., ‘It means as if we are excluded from the good freedom: thwarted expectations of independence in the Luapula Province of Zambia, 1964–6’, The Journal of African History, 47:1 (2006), 43–56Google Scholar; and Larmer, ‘A little bit like a volcano’, 49–83.

7 M. Larmer, ‘Historical perspectives on Zambia’s mining booms and busts’, in Fraser and Larmer (eds.), Zambia, Mining, and Neoliberalism, 31–58 (31).

8 Larmer, ‘What went wrong?’, 235–56 (238).

9 Gewald, Hinfelaar, and Macola (eds.), One Zambia, 2.

10 Larmer, Hinfelaar, Phiri, Schumaker, and Szeftel, ‘Introduction: narratives of nationhood’, 895–905 (901).

11 Ndangwa, ‘Good governance’, 70–6 (72).

12 Fraser and Larmer (eds.), Zambia, Mining, and Neoliberalism, 6.

13 Fraser, A., Zambia: back to the future, Global Economic Governance Programme, Working Paper (2007), 1–47 (12)Google Scholar.

14 Larmer et al., ‘Introduction’, 897.

15 Fraser and Larmer (eds.), Zambia, Mining, and Neoliberalism, 7.

16 D. Gordon, ‘Rebellion or massacre: the UNIP-Lumpa conflict revisited’, in Gewald, Hinfelaar, and Macola (eds.), One Zambia, 45–76.

17 Macola, ‘It means …’, 44.

18 Anglin, D., ‘Zambia and southern African liberation movements: 1964–1974’, in Shaw, T. and Heard, K. (eds.), The Politics of Africa: Dependence and Development (Harlow, 1979), 182–213Google Scholar; Nolutshungu, S. C., South Africa in Africa: A Study in Ideology and Foreign Policy (Manchester, 1975)Google Scholar; Shaw, T. M., ‘The foreign policy of Zambia: ideology and interests’, The Journal of Modern African Studies, 14:1 (1976), 79–105Google Scholar; Burdette, M., Zambia: Between Two Worlds (Boulder, CO, 1988)Google Scholar.

19 Larmer et al., ‘Introduction’, 897.

20 Gordon, Invisible, 2.

21 Young, C., The Postcolonial State in Africa: Fifty Years of Independence, 1960–2010 (Madison, WI, 2012), 131Google Scholar.

22 Mazrui, A. A., ‘On poet-presidents and philosopher-kings’, Research in African Literatures, 21:2 (1990), 13–19 (13)Google Scholar.

23 K. L. Stevinson, ‘Humanism as political ideology: a study of its role in the evolution of the leadership of Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia’ (unpublished MA thesis, Haverford College, 1985), 2; Sekwat, A., ‘Beyond African humanism: economic reform in post-independent Zambia’, International Journal of Organisation Theory and Behaviour, 3 (2000), 521–46 (523)Google Scholar.

24 Taylor, I., ‘Zambia's foreign policy: themes and approaches’, Politikon, 24:2 (1997), 57–65 (57–8)Google Scholar.

25 See Meebelo, H. S., Main Currents of Zambian Humanist Thought (Lusaka, 1973)Google Scholar, 1; and Scarritt, J., ‘Elite values, ideology, and power in post-independence Zambia’, African Studies Review, 14:1 (1971), 31–54 (45)Google Scholar.

26 Legum, C. (ed.), Zambia: From Independence to Beyond: The Speeches of Kenneth Kaunda (London, 1966), 195Google Scholar.

27 Mkandawire, T., African Intellectuals: Rethinking Politics, Language, Gender and Development (London, 2005), 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Molten, R. and Tordoff, W., ‘Conclusion chapter: “Independent Zambia: achievements and prospects”’, in Tordoff, W. (ed.), Politics in Zambia (Manchester, UK, 1974), 370–1Google Scholar.

29 Martin, A., Minding Their Own Business (London, 1973), 107Google Scholar.

30 M. Hinfelaar, ‘Legitimizing powers: the political role of the Roman Catholic Church, 1972–1991’, in Gewald, Hinfelaar, and Macola (eds.), One Zambia, 127–43 (130).

31 Rotberg, R. I., Transformative Political Leadership: Making a Difference in the Developing World (Chicago, 2012), 21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Macola, Liberal Nationalism in Central Africa, 118.

33 Albinson, F., ‘Cooperative education in Zambia’, in Albinson, F., Norbeck, J., and Sundén, R. (eds.), Folk Development Education and Democracy in a Development Perspective (Stockholm, 2002), 13Google Scholar.

34 Scarritt, J. R., ‘The decline of political legitimacy in Zambia: an explanation based on incomplete data’, African Studies Review, 22:2 (1979), 13–38 (17)Google Scholar.

35 Scarritt, ‘The decline’, 17.

36 Dumont, R. and Mazoyer, M., Socialisms and Development, trans. Cunningham, R. (London, 1973), 128Google Scholar.

37 Quick, S. A., Humanism or Technocracy? (published on behalf of the Institute for African Studies, University of Zambia, by Manchester University Press, 1978), 56Google Scholar.

38 Dumont, Socialisms, 135.

39 Lombard, S. C., The growth of cooperatives in Zambia, 1914–1971, Zambia Papers No. 6 (University of Zambia, 1971), 23–5Google Scholar.

40 See Scott, I., ‘Middle-class politics in Zambia’, African Affairs, 77:308 (1978), 321–34 (323)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; T. L. Moorsom, ‘“Black settlers”: hybridity, neoliberalism and ecosystemic change among Tonga farmers of southern Zambia, 1964–2008’ (unpublished PhD thesis, Queen's University, Canada, 2016), 154; Macola, Liberal, 115.

41 Macola, ‘It means …’, 43–56.

42 Israel National Archives, Jerusalem (INA), Zambia General, 1926/4.

43 INA 1926/4, 26 June 1964.

44 Oded, A., Africa Ve'Israel, Yehudiut Vetahapuhot Be'Yehase Hutz shel Israel[Africa and Israel, A Unique case of Radical Changes in Foreign Policy] (Jerusalem, 2013)Google Scholar.

45 Peters, J., Israel and Africa: The Problematic Friendship (London, 1992)Google Scholar.

46 T. S. Rodin, ‘Political aspects of Israeli foreign aid in Africa’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Nebraska, 1969).

47 Zambia National Archives, Lusaka (ZNA) NCDP 2/3/2, Aid Israel, Permanent Secretary of the Foreign Ministry, 23 Dec. 1964.

48 ZNA NCDP 2/3/2, Aid Israel, 7 May 1965 and 11 May 1965.

49 ZNA NCDP 2/3/2, Aid Israel, 30 Apr. 1965.

50 ZNA NCDP 2/3/2, Aid Israel. Given the centralized nature of Kaunda's rule, this directive was likely coordinated with the President. On Kaunda's centralized rule, see Chan, S., Kaunda and Southern Africa: Image and Reality in Foreign Policy (London, 1992), 14–24Google Scholar.

51 INA 13546/2, Letter from Zafti, 18 June 1965.

52 Scarritt, ‘Elite’, 45.

53 ZNA NCDP 2/3/2, Aid Israel, memorandum of Vice President, n.d.

54 ZNA FA/1/367, Note no. 0614, 14 June 1972. For a detailed overview of the mission from 1966–9, see D. Yadin, Three Years of Israeli Agricultural Aid in Zambia (Report submitted to the Israeli Foreign Ministry, 1969).

55 Ibid. 29.

56 Ibid. 4.

57 Schwartz and Hare, Foreign Experts, 80.

Yadin, Three, 40–1.

58 Ibid. 35.

59 Schwartz and Hare, Foreign Experts, 80–1.

60 Yadin, Three, 40–1.

61 Schwartz and Hare, Foreign Experts, 94.

62 Ibid. 89.

63 Ibid. 90.

64 Schwartz, M., Hare, P., Saasa, O. S., Nwana, E., Devkota, K., and Peperkamp, B., Israeli Settlement Assistance to Zambia, Nigeria and Nepal (Veenstra, Groningen, 2002), 22Google Scholar; Schwartz and Hare, Foreign Experts, 91.

65 Lombard, The Growth, 25.

66 Quick, Humanism, 112.

67 INA 4191/36.

68 The Observer, 15 Dec. 1971.

69 Zambian Farmer, 17 Aug. 1971, quote in Shimeon Amir, Israel’s Development Cooperation with Africa, Asia and Latin America (New York, 1974), 32.

70 INA 4581/39, Report of the ceremony of the arrival of the new Israeli ambassador, 14 Oct. 1971.

71 ZNA NCDP/213/11, External Aid Policy Israel, minutes of a meeting, 29 July 1969.

72 ZNA NCDP/213/11, External Aid Policy Israel, letter from Kenneth Kaunda, 28 Aug. 1969.

73 ZNA NCDP/213/11, External Aid Policy Israel, minutes of a meeting, 29 July 1969.

74 INA 4832/2, Aug. 1973.

75 One important study of the Ghana case study is Levey, Z., ‘The rise and decline of a special relationship: Israel and Ghana, 1957–1966’, African Studies Review, 46:1 (2003), 155–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For generalized views on the continent as a whole, see Levey, Z., Israel in Africa: 1956–1976 (Dordrecht, 2012)Google Scholar; Peters, Israel.

76 Anglin, Zambia.

77 INA 4581/39, Report of the ceremony of the arrival of the new Israeli ambassador, 14 Oct. 1971.

78 Ibid.

79 INA 4025/16, Report on Israel – Zambia relations; Report at the end of Elron's term, 7 July 1971.

80 For a review of the various positions, see A. J. DeRoche, ‘“You can't fight guns with knives”: national security and Zambian responses to UDI, 1965–1973’, in Gewald, Hinfelaar, and Macola (eds.), One Zambia, 77–97.

81 DeRoche, ‘“You can't fight guns with knives”’, 77–97.

82 ZNA FA/1/272, Israel-Arab Conflict – Middle East Crisis, Report of security council condemnation of Israel on 8 Apr. 1969 from V. J. Mwaanga.

83 Hall, R., The High Price of Principles: Kaunda and the White South (London, 1969)Google Scholar; Good, K., ‘Zambia and the liberation of South Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 25:3 (1987), 505–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Shaw, ‘The foreign policy of Zambia’, 103.

85 DeRoche, ‘“You can't fight guns with knives”’, 77–97.

86 Ibid. 96.

87 ZNA FA/1/208, Israel-UAR Conflict – Middle East Crisis, Banda in Washington, DC to Kapwepwe, 30 June 1967.

88 ZNA FA/1/272, Israel-Arab Conflict – Middle East Crisis, 26 Aug. 1969.

89 INA 4025/16, Report on Israel – Zambia relations, 7 June 1971.

90 ZNA FA/1/208, Israel-UAR Conflict – Middle East Crisis.

91 Levey, Israel in Africa.

92 ZNA FA/1/208, Israel-UAR Conflict – Middle East Crisis.

93 Ibid.

94 Ibid.

95 Ibid.

96 ZNA FA/1/272, Israel-Arab Conflict – Middle East Crisis.

97 Zambia Daily Mail, 22 June 1983 quoted in Good, K., ‘The reproduction of weakness in the state and agriculture: Zambian experience’, African Affairs, 85:339 (1986), 239–65 (241)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

98 Chan, Kaunda, 12.

99 DeRoche similarly argued that the First Republic was a time of ‘high hopes for a bright future’. DeRoche, ‘“You can't fight guns with knives”’, 96.

100 ZNA FA/1/272, Israel-Arab Conflict – Middle East Crisis. The following quotes are all taken from the mission report of Vernon Mwaanga to the UAR, Syria, Israel, and Jordan from 10–17 Dec. 1968.

101 ZNA FA/1/272, Israel-Arab Conflict – Middle East Crisis.

102 INA 4025/16, Report on Israel – Zambia relations, 7 July 1971.

103 This can be seen even among some of his staunchest opponents of the early years, as seen in Moorsom's study of the Tonga in the Southern Province. Moorsom, ‘“Black settlers”, 26–7.

104 Larmer et al., ‘Introduction’, 898.

105 INA 4025/16, Report of internal matters in Zambia, 31 Oct. 1967.

106 INA 4025/16, Report on Israel – Zambia relations, 7 July 1971.

107 INA 4832/2, 24 Sept. 1973.

108 Macola, ‘It means …’, 43–56.

109 Taylor, ‘Zambia's foreign policy’, 57–8.

110 Chan, Kaunda, 150.