Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:23:39.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impacts of Sample Size and Quality-Adjusted Imputed Prices on Own-Price Elasticities Estimated Using Cross-Sectional Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Matthew C. Stockton
Matthew C. Stockton*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cross-sectional data sets containing expenditure and quantity information are typically used to calculate quality-adjusted imputed prices. Do sample size and quality adjustment of price statistically alter estimates for own-price elasticities? This paper employs a data set pertaining to three food categories—pork, cheese, and food away from home—with four sample sizes for each food category. Twelve sample sizes were used for both adjusted and unadjusted prices to derive elasticities. No statistical differences were found between own-price elasticities among sample sizes. However, elasticities that were based on adjusted price imputations were significantly different from those that were based on unadjusted prices.

Keywords

cross-sectional dataimputed pricesquality-adjusted pricesB41D12C21C24
Type
Graduate Student Paper Awards
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , August 2003 , pp. 415 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R.G.D., and Bowley, A.L.. Family Expenditures: A Study of Its Variation. London: RS. King & Sons, 1935.Google Scholar
Cowling, K., and Rayner, A.J.. “Price, Quality and Market Share.” Journal of Political Economics 78,6(November-December 1970): 1292–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, T., and Wohlgenant, M.K.. “Prices and Quality Effects in Cross-Sectional Demand Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(November 1986):908–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. “Quality, Quantity, and Spatial Variation of Price.” American Economic Review 78,3(June 1988):418–30.Google Scholar
George, P.S., and King, G.A.. Consumer Demand for Food Commodities in the United States with Projections for 1980. Berkeley: University of California, Giannini Foundation Monograph No. 26, March 1971.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. “Hedonic Price Indexes for Automobiles: An Econometric Analysis of Quality Change.” The Price Statistics of the Federal Government. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1961.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. “Quality Variation and Quantity Aggregation in Consumer Demand for Food.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(November 1991):1204–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, A.M. “The Demand for Housing: A Study in Specification and Grouping.” Econometrica 45(March 1977):447–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prais, S.J., and Houthakker, H.S.. The Analysis of Family Budgets. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1955.Google Scholar