Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T04:48:32.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agribusiness And The Agricultural Economics Profession: Research Agendas In Agribusiness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Kerry K. Litzenberg
Kerry K. Litzenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a summary of work by various groups on the potential for agribusiness research by agricultural economists over the past decade. Methodology to establish research priorities in agribusiness are reviewed. This review leads to a consideration of the agribusiness research issues including: funding sources, identifying users of agribusiness research, data needs, and limitations of agribusiness research programs.

The final part of the paper presents a potpourri of suggested research initiatives in agribusiness research for agricultural economists. Research in these areas may be difficult for a number of reasons including: decreased reliance on economic theory as the sole paradigm, providing competitive advantage to a single agribusiness firm while balancing public and private needs and funding sources, and data confidentiality. Suggestions for outlets for academic research are presented.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , July 1992 , pp. 31 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, E.M. “Production and Operations Management,” Agribus., an Int. J., 2.4 (1986): 421–429.Google Scholar
Davis, J.H. and Ray Goldberg. “A Concept of Agribusiness.” Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, 1957.Google Scholar
Dobson, W.B. and Akridge, J.T.. “Establishing Agribusiness Research Priorities and Coordinating Agribusiness Research.” Agribus, an Int. J., 5. (1989):315–333.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark W., Parasuraman, A., Futrell, Charles M. and Black, William C.. “A Longitudinal Assessment of the Impact of Selected Organizational Influences on Salespeople's Organizational Commitment During Early Employment.” J. Marketing Res., 27. (1990): 333–44.Google Scholar
Litzenberg, Kerry K. and Schneider, Vernon E.. “A Review of Past Agribusiness Management Research.” Agribus., an Int. J., 2.4 (1986): 397–408.Google Scholar
Mazzocco, Michael and Sonka, Steve. “The Academic Challenge—Agribusiness Management Research and Educational Needs in the 1990's: Research Challenges.” Proceedings, Inaugural symposium of the International Agribusiness Management Association, Boston, March, 1991.Google Scholar
Polopolus, L. “Agricultural Economics Beyond the Farm Gate.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 64. (1982): 803–810.Google Scholar
Sonka, S.T. and Hudson, M.A.. “Why Agribusiness anyway?” Agribus.., an Int. 1, 5.(1989): 305–314.Google Scholar
Sonka, S.T. and Hudson, M.A. “Research Issues and Opportunities Affecting the Competitiveness of Agribusiness Firms.” Agribus., an Int. J., 6.2 (1990) 87–96.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Strategic Marketing Needed to Lead Agribusiness in International Trade.” Report to the Secretary of Agriculture, GAO/RCED-91-22, January, 1991.Google Scholar
Westgren, R.E., Sonka, S. T. and Litzenberg, K.K.. “Strategic Issue Identification among Agribusiness Firms.” Agribus., an Int. J., 4.1(1988): 25–37.Google Scholar
Woolverton, M.W., Cramer, G.L., and Hammonds, T.M.. “Agribusiness: What Is It All About?” Agribus., an Int. J. 1.1 (1986): 1.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar