Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:35:45.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Allocation of Farm Financial Stress Among Income, Leverage, and Interest Rate Components: A Kansas Example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Allen M. Featherstone
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
Ted C. Schroeder
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas
Robert O. Burton Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas

Abstract

Suggested methods to reduce farm financial stress have included interest rate buy-downs and debt forgiveness. This study develops a method to estimate the proportion of individual farm financial stress attributable to an income problem, a leverage problem, and an interest rate problem. Of the Kansas Farm Management Association farms with a financial problem, 30 percent of the total financial problem is caused by an interest rate problem, 28 percent by a leverage problem, and 42 percent by an income problem. A reduction of leverage or interest rate to the level attained by the average nonstressed farms would make 31 percent and 32 percent of the stressed farms profitable, respectively. Therefore, in the short run, an interest rate buy-down or a debt reduction would be equally effective.

Type
Submitted Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, P.J. Financial Stress in Agriculture: Policy and Financial Consequences For Farmers. AE-4621, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Nov. 1986.Google Scholar
Barry, P.J., Hopkin, J.A., and Baker, C.B.. Financial Management in Agriculture. Third Edition. Danville, Illinois: Interstate Printers & Publishers, 1983.Google Scholar
Brake, J.R., and Boehlje, M.D.. “Solutions of Financial Stress Problems from the Private and Public Sectors.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):11231128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressler, R.G. Jr, and King, R.A.. Markets, Prices and Interregional Trade. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970.Google Scholar
Brigham, E.F.Financial Management: Theory and Practice. Third Edition. Chicago: Dryden Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Economic Report of the President, Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1987.Google Scholar
Farrell, M.J.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.J. Royal Statist. Soc, Series A, 120(1957):253281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.D., Baum, K., and Prescott, R.. Financial Characteristics of U.S. Farms, January 1985. AIB-495, USDA ERS, July 1985.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.D., Prescott, R., Banker, D., and Morehart, M.J.. Financial Characteristics of U.S. Farms, January 1, 1986. AIB 500, USDA, ERS, Aug. 1986.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.D., Morehart, M.J., and Erickson, K.. “Financial Conditions of the Farm Sector and Farm Operators.Agr. Fin. Rev., 47, Special Issue (1987a):118.Google Scholar
Johnson, J.D., Morehart, M.J., Nielson, L., Banker, D., and Ryan, J.. Financial Characteristics of U.S. Farms, January 1, 1987. AIB 525, USDA/ERS, August 1987b.Google Scholar
Jolly, R.W., Paulsen, A., Johnson, J.D.Baum, K.H., and Prescott, R.. “Incidence, Intensity, and Duration of Financial Stress among Farm Firms.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):11081115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leathers, H.D.Debt and Efficiency as Determinants of Farm Survival: An Empirical Approach.” Selected paper presented at AAEA meeting, East Lansing, Michigan, 1987.Google Scholar
Lines, A.E., and Morehart, M.J.. “Financial Health of U.S. Farm Financial Businesses in 1984: A Region, Type, and Size Analysis.Agr. Fin. Rev., 47(1987):4352.Google Scholar
Lins, D.A., Ellinger, P.N., and Latz, D.H.. “Measurement of Financial Stress in Agriculture.Agr. Fin. Rev., 47(1987):5361.Google Scholar
Lovell, C.A.K., and Sickles, R.C.. “Testing Efficiency Hypotheses in Joint Production: A Parametric Approach.Rev. Econ. Stat., 65(1983):5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenberg-DeBoer, J.The Microeconomic Roots of the Farm Crisis. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1986.Google Scholar
Melichar, E. “A Financial Perspective on Agriculture.” Fed. Res. Bui., Jan. 1984.Google Scholar
Melichar, E. “Farm Financial Experience and Agricultural Banking Experience.” Statement before the U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, Subcommittee on Economic Stabilization, Oct. 23, 1985.Google Scholar
Moss, C.B., Featherstone, A.M., and Baker, T.G.. “Agricultural Assets in an Efficient Multiperiod Investment Portfolio.Agr. Fin. Rev., 47(1987):8294.Google Scholar
Osburn, D.D., and Schneeberger, K.C.. Modern Agricultural Management: A Systems Ap proach to Farming. Second Edition. Reston, Virginia: Reston Publishing Company, Inc., 1983.Google Scholar
Parker, L.C.Extension Farm Management Assoications —A Model for Kansas Agriculture. Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan, Kansas, 1982.Google Scholar
Pretzer, D.D.Kansas Land Prices—Cash Rental Rates and Associated Data. Cooperative Ex tension Service, Manhattan, Kansas, 1987.Google Scholar
Reinsel, R.D., and Joseph, A.. The Financial Condition of Agriculture: An Income Analysis. USDA ERS Staff Rep. AGES860710, Aug. 1986.Google Scholar
Taylor, T.G., Drummond, H.E., and Gomes, A.T.. “Agricultural Credit Programs and Production Efficiency: An Analysis of Traditional Farming in Southeastern Minas Gerais, Brazil.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 68(1986):110118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar