Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:22:19.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alternative Fluid Milk Procurement Systems For Florida Dairy Farmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Christopher A. Nubern  and
Richard L. Kilmer
Christopher A. Nubern
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida
Richard L. Kilmer
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department at the University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article evaluates the effects of alternative fluid milk procurement strategies on the aggregate net revenue of Florida cooperative members. They are (1) supplemental milk obtained from import sources, (2) supplemental milk obtained from a supply plant, (3) increased supply as a result of an expanded production area, and (4) supplemental milk obtained through pooling arrangements with regional dairy cooperatives. The final ranking of a scenario appears to be dependent primarily on the total cost of exports within the model. The optimum procurement strategy for Florida cooperatives should concentrate on reducing the quantity of surplus milk.

Keywords

cooperativeexportsimportsnet revenuepoolingprocurement
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 460 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buccola, Steven T. and Conner, M.C.. “Least-Cost Milk Assembly and Manufacturing Plant Locations For the Northeastern Dairy Industry.” J. Northeastern Agr. Econ. Council, 8(1979):6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Milk Marketing Order. Federal Milk Marketing Order Statistics: Washington, D.C, 1992 Annual Summary.Google Scholar
Florida Agricultural Statistics Service. Florida Agricultural Statistics: Livestock, Dairy, Poultry. Orlando, FL.: June 1994.Google Scholar
Gao, Xaoming, Spreen, Thomas H., and DeLorenzo, Michael A.. “A Bio-Economic Dynamic Programming Analysis of the Seasonal Supply Response By Florida Dairy Producers.” S. J. Agr. Econ., 24(1992):211–220.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Harry M., Oltenacu, Pascal A., and Smith, Terry R.. “The Effects of Alternative Seasonal Price Differentials on Milk Production in New York.” Northeastern J. Agr. Res. Econ., 17(1988):46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilmer, Richard L., Morrill, John, Spreen, Thomas H., and DeLorenzo, Michael. “The Effects of Alternative Cow Freshening Distributions on Milk Production and Imports in Florida.” Northeastern J. Agr. Econ., 21(1992): 151-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prato, Anthony A. “Evaluation of Alternative Milk Marketing Arrangements in Southeast Florida”. Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976):93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Warren P., Babb, Emerson M., and Btnkley, James K.. “Efficient Milk Procurement in the East North Central United States.“ North Central J. Agr. Econ., 7(1985): 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prindle, Allen M. and Livezey, Janet S. “Optimal Production Schedules for a Representative Farm Under Alternative Seasonal Milk Pricing Patterns of the Base-Excess Plan.” J. Northeastern Agr. Econ. Council., 10(1981):23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, Russell. “The Seasonal Pricing Plan for Milk.” J. Farm Econ., 49(1967):643-55.Google Scholar