Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:51:53.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of Value-Added Agricultural Exports to Middle-Income Developing Countries: The Case of Wheat and Beef Products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Jung-Hee Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
David Henneberry
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
David Pyles
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma

Abstract

This study determined probable future directions in U.S. value-added agricultural exports to middle-income developing countries (MIDCs) under the assumption of continued income growth. Import share equations for U.S. bulk, semi-processed and value-added wheat or beef products, as a percent of total U.S. wheat or beef product exports to each MIDC, were econometrically estimated using the ordinary least squares (OLS) technique. The empirical results indicate that in most MIDCs, increases in real per capita income have negative effects on the import share of processed wheat products while having positive effects on the import share of bulk wheat. However, import shares of U.S. processed beef products are likely to increase with income growth in most MIDCs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Karen, MacDonald, Stephen, and Milmoe, Steve. “International Trade.” Nat. Food Rev., 12(1989):44.Google Scholar
Alston, Julian M, Carter, Colin A., Green, Richard, and Pick, Daniel. “Whither Armington Trade Models?Am. J. Agr. Econ., 72(1990):455467.Google Scholar
Armington, Paul S.A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.IMF Staff Papers, 16.1(1969):159178.Google Scholar
Central Bank of China. Financial Statistics. The Republic of China, various issues.Google Scholar
Council for Economic Planning and Development. Industry of Free China. The Republic of China, Vol. L12, No. 1, July 1989.Google Scholar
Deaton, Angus and Muellbauer, John. “An Almost Ideal Demand System.Am. Econ. Rev., 70.3(1980):312326.Google Scholar
International Wheat Council. World Wheat Statistics. London, various issues.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung-Hee, Henneberry, David, and Pyles, David. “Value-Added Agricultural Exports: An Overview for Oklahoma and the United States.Current Farm Econ., 63.1, Ag. Exp. Sta., Div. of Ag., Oklahoma State University, March 1990.Google Scholar
Nuttall, John. “U.S. Farm Exports: The Value-Added Factors.Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, FAS, January 1983.Google Scholar
Rahe, Dewain H. and Collie, Willis G.. ‘Value-added Exports Around the World.1985 Yearbook of Agriculture, Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Schluter, Gerald and Clayton, Kenneth C.. “Expanding the Processed Product Share of U.S. Agricultural Exports.Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Econ. Res. Svc, Nat. Econ. Div., Staff Rep. No. AGES8 1070 1,July 1981.Google Scholar
Schluter, Gerald and Edmondson, William. “Exporting Processed Instead of Raw Agricultural Products.” Washington DC: U.S. Dept. of Agr., Econ. Res. Svc, Agr. and Rur. Econ. Dev., Staff Rep. No. AGES89-58, November 1989.Google Scholar
United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization. FAO Production Yearbook. Rome, various issues.Google Scholar
United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization. FAO Trade Yearbook. Rome, various issues.Google Scholar
United Nations, International Monetary Fund. International Financial Statistics. Washington DC, various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Services. Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States. Washington DC, various issues.Google Scholar