Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:59:01.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consumer Expenditures at Direct Produce Markets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Raymond Joe Schatzer ,
Daniel S. Tilley  and
Douglas Moesel
Raymond Joe Schatzer
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Daniel S. Tilley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Douglas Moesel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Interviews of customers at direct produce markets were conducted to determine why expenditure patterns vary. Frequency of shopping at outlets, income, uses of produce, household composition, and distance to the outlet are important determinants of expenditures at direct product outlets.

Keywords

consumer preferencefarmers' marketsdemandfresh produce
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , July 1989 , pp. 131 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, G.S. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” Econ. J., 75(1965):493–517.Google Scholar
Blackburn, K.L., and Jack, R.L.. “Consumers' Opinions, Attitudes and Use of Direct Markets in West Virginia.” West Virginia University, Ag. and For. Exp. St., Bui. 686, March 1984.Google Scholar
Blaylock, J.R., and Gallo, A.E.. “Modeling the Decision to Produce Vegetables at Home.” Amer. J. of.Agri. Econ., 65, 4(1983):722–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooker, J.R., and Taylor, E.G.. “Direct Marketing of Produce—the Shelby County Farmers' Market Case.” University of Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Bulletin 569, April 1977.Google Scholar
Buse, R.C., and Salathe, L.E.. “Adult Equivalent Scales: An Alternative Approach.” Amer. J.of Agri. Econ., 60, 3(1978):460–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glejser, H. “A New Test for Heteroscedasticity.” Amer. Stat. Assn., 64(1969):316–323.Google Scholar
Johnson, E.H. “Canning and Freezing—What is the Payoff?” Family Econ. Rev., ARS-NE-36(1976):6–13.Google Scholar
Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R.C. Lütkepohl, H., and Lee, T.C.. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1985.Google Scholar
Kaitz, E.F. “Home Gardening and Incidence of Freezing and Canning.” Family Econ. Rev., ARS-NE-36(1977):3–6.Google Scholar
Price, D.W. “The Effects of Household Composition on Income Elasticities of Food Commodities.” Washington State University, Ag. Exp. St., Tech. Bul. 63, 1969.Google Scholar
Smallwood, D.M., and Blaylock, J.R.. “Household Expenditures for Fruits, Vegetables, and Potatoes.” USDA, ERS, Tech. Bul. 1690, May 1984.Google Scholar
Toensmeyer, U.C., and Ladzinski, K.. “Consumer Attitudes Concerning Marketing of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables through Direct Markets, Delaware.” University of Delaware, Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, Bul. 443, February 1983.Google Scholar
Vaupel, S. “The Farmers of Farmers' Markets.” California Agriculture, 43, 1(1989)28–30.Google Scholar
Willett, J.B., and Singer, J. Di. “Another Cautionary Note About R2: Its Use in Weighted Least-Squares Regression Analysis.” The Amer. Stat, 42, 3(1988):236–238.Google Scholar