Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:14:15.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A County-Level Model of Manufacturing Plant Recruitment with Improved Industrial Site Quality Measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

Warren Kriesel
Affiliation:
Extension Economic Development Department, University of Georgia
Kevin T. McNamara
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics Department, Purdue University

Abstract

Empirical analysis of manufacturing plant location requires the use of a single industrial site quality measure. Under hedonic price theory, the price of industrial sites can be explained by their quality characteristics. The estimated site price is included with ten other location factors in an ordered, categorical logit model of plant attraction to Georgia counties. The results inform public decisionmakers of the relative impact of site location factors and how changes in location factors can alter the probability of attracting a manufacturing plant.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Conway, H. McKinley. Marketing Industrial Buildings and Sites. Atlanta: Conway Data, Inc. 1987.Google Scholar
Deaton, Brady. “Industrial Plant Site Quality.” New Approaches to Economic Development Research in Rural Areas. Northwest Regional Center for Rural Development, Publication 30. July, 1981.Google Scholar
Debertin, David L., Pagoulatos, Angelos, and Smith, Eldon M.. “Estimating Linear Probability Functions: A Comparison of Approaches.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 11(1980):6569.Google Scholar
Dinan, Terry M., and Miranowski, John A.. “Estimating the Implicit Price of Energy Efficiency Improvements in the Residential Housing Market: A Hedonic Approach.J. Urban Econ. 25(1989):5267.Google Scholar
Harrell, Frank E. Jr.The LOGIST Procedure.” ISSUE GI, Supplemental Users Guide Version 5. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1986.Google Scholar
Kriesel, Warren and McNamara, Kevin. An Implicit Pricing Model for Characteristics of Industrial Sites. Faculty Series 89-59, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia, November, 1989.Google Scholar
Kriesel, Warren, Deaton, Brady, and Johnson, Tom. “Industrial Development as a Community Investment Decision.” Selected Paper, American Agricultural Economics Association, August, 1984.Google Scholar
Kuehn, John A., Braschler, Curtis, and Scott Shonkwiler, J.. “Rural Industrialization and Community Action: New Plant Locations Among Missouri's Small Towns.” J. Comm. Dev. Soc., 10(1979):95107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Kevin T., Kriesel, Warren and Deaton, Brady. “Manufacturing Location: The Impact of Human Capital Stocks and Flows.” Regional Studies, 18.1(1988):4248.Google Scholar
Newman, Robert J., and Sullivan, Dennis H.. “Econometric Analysis of Business Tax Impacts on Industrial Location: What We Know, and How Do We Know It?J. Urban Econ., 23(1988):215234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Harry W. Regional Growth Theory. London: MacMillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Smith, David M. Industrial Location. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981.Google Scholar
Smith, Eldon D., Deaton, Brady J. and Kelch, David R.. “Location Determinants of Manufacturing Industry in Rural Areas.So. J. Agr. Econ., 10(1978):2332.Google Scholar
Sulaiman, Jamalludin, and Hushak, Leroy J.. “The Impact of Industrial Sites on Industrial Employment Growth: ACase Study of Appalachian Ohio.” Am. Indus. Dev. Court. J., 15(1980):722.Google Scholar
Walker, Robert, and Calzonetti, Frank. “Searching for New Manufacturing Plant Locations: A Study of Location Decisions in Central Appalachia.” Regional Studies, 23(1989): 1530.Google Scholar
Wallace, L.T., and Ruttan, V.W. “The Role of The Community as a Factor in Industrial Location.Pap. Proceed. Reg. Sci. Assoc., 7(1961):133142.Google Scholar