Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:43:04.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Impacts of EPA's Manure Application Regulations on Dairy Farms with Lagoon Liquid Systems in the Southwest Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2005

Wen-yuan Huang ,
Richard Magleby  and
Lee Christensen
Wen-yuan Huang
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, DC
Richard Magleby
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, DC
Lee Christensen
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, DC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

EPA's new restrictions on land application of manure nutrients by concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) could decrease the net return of 6–17% of the medium and large dairy farms with lagoon systems in the southwestern United States. Many of the other dairy CAFOs in the region could achieve higher net income under the restrictions if they reduce feed costs by better utilizing manure and expanding homegrown feed production.

Keywords

CAFOdairy farmsland applicationmanure regulationsnutrient managementC61Q12Q52Q58
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , April 2005 , pp. 209 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashraf, M., Christensen, R., and Frick, G.E.. The Impact on Dairy Farm Organization of Alternative Manure Disposal Systems. Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin No. 608. University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1974.Google Scholar
Bosch, D., and Pease, J.. Economic Impacts of Manure Application Restrictions on Dairy Farms. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1993.Google Scholar
Diebel, P., Hastead, J.M., Batie, S.S., Kramer, R.A. and Taylor, D.B.. Managing Agricultural Nitrate Contamination of Groundwater in Rockingham County, Virginia: A Policy Analysis. SP-89-2. Department of Agricultural Economics, SP-89-2, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1989.Google Scholar
Dorn, W.T. Annualized Cost of Irrigation System. Extension educator, Lancaster County, Nebraska. Internet sites: http://lancaster.unl.edu/ag/crops/irrgcost.pdf. (Accessed March 2001).Google Scholar
Economic Research Service. Costs and Return: Crops. Internet site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/costsandreturns. Accessed 3/10/2001.Google Scholar
Good, D.L., Hoglund, C.R., Connor, L.J., and Johnson, J.B.. Economic Impacts of Applying Selected Pollution Control Measures on Michigan Dairy Farms. East Lansing, Michigan State University. Agricultural Experimental Station, 1973.Google Scholar
Heimlich, R.E. Phosphorus Reduction and Farm Income: Modeling Efficient Response to Phosphorus Loading Constraints on Vermont Dairy Farms. Technical Report, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1982.Google Scholar
Innes, R. “The Economics of Livestock Waste and Its Regulation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(Febraary 2000):97–117.10.1111/0002-9092.00009Google Scholar
Kaplan, J.D., Johansson, R., and Peters, M.A.. Proposed Regulations for Manure Management: Potential Sector Impacts. Agricultural Outlook. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, April, 2002.Google Scholar
Leatham, D.J., Schmucker, J.F., Lacewell, R.D., Schwart, R.B., Lovel, A.C., and Allen, G.. “Impact of Texas Water Quality Laws on Dairy Income and Viability.” Journal of Dairy Science 75(1992): 2846–56.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78048-5Google Scholar
Litke, D.W. Review of Phosphorus Control Measures in the United States and Their Effects on Water Quality. Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4007. U.S. Geological Survey. U.S. Department of Interior, 1999.Google Scholar
McSweeney, W., and Shortle, J.. “Reducing Nutrient Application Rates for Water Quality Protection in Intensive Livestock Areas: Policy Implications of Alternative Producer Behavior.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 10,2(1989): 1–11.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, M. “State Legislation Regulating Animal Manure Management.” Review of Agricultural Economics 22,2(2000):519–32.10.1111/1058-7195.00036Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (NAS). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 5th ed. Washington, D.C: National Academy of Sciences, 1978.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), U.S. Department of Agriculture. Dairy Production Practices and Costs and Returns Survey, Washington, DC, 2000.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistical Service. (2001a). U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Cash Rents. Sp Sy 3(99). Washington, DC, 2001a.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices. Washington, DC, July, 2001b.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Department of Agriculture. Comprehensive Nutrient Management Planning: Technical Guidance. Washington, DC, December, 2001.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D., Rogers, H., Lamm, F., and Clark, G.. Economic Comparison of SDI and Central Pivots for Various Field Sizes. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, 1997.Google Scholar
Outlaw, J., Purvis, A., and Miller, J.. An Evaluation of Dairy Manure Management Economics. AFPC Policy Research Report 95-2, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, 1995.Google Scholar
Pratt, S., Jones, R., and Jones, C.A.. Livestock and Environment: Expanding the Focus.Google Scholar
TIAEA PR96-03. Tarleton State University, Texas, 1997.Google Scholar
Schmit, T.M., and Knoblauch, W.A.. “The Impact of Nutrient Loading Restrictions on Dairy Farm Profitability.” Journal of Daily Science 78(1995):1267–81.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76747-9Google Scholar
Short, D.S. Structure, Management, and Performance Characteristics of Specialized Dairy Farm Businesses in the United States. Agricultural Handbook Number 720. Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, 2000.Google Scholar
Sutton, A.L., Jones, D.D., Joern, B.C., and Huber, D.M.. Animal Manure as a Plant Nutrient Resource. ID-101, Purdue University Cooperative Service, May, 1994.Google Scholar
Sweeten, J.M., and Wolfe, M.L.. “Manure and Wastewater Management Systems for Open Lot Dairy Operations.” American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Transactions of the ASAE. 47,4(1994): 1145–54.Google Scholar
Texas A&M University Extension Service. Crop and Livestock Budgets. Internet site: http//agecoext.tmu.edu/budgets/list.htm. (Accessed May 2000).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics 2001. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC, 2001.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 41 Federal Regulations 11458, March 1976.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Unified National Strategy for Animal Feeding Operations. Office of Wastewater Management, EPA, Washington, DC, March 9, 1999.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Regulation and Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Standards for Concentrated Feeding Operations. 40 CFR Parts 9, 122 and 412. Washington, DC, December 15, 2002a.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. NPDES Support Document for the Final Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Rule. Office of Wastewater Management, Washington, DC, December, 2002b.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), U.S. Department of the Interior. The Quality of Our Nation's Waters: Nutrients and Pesticides. USGS Circular 1225, Washington, DC, 1999.Google Scholar