Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:50:33.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics and Uncertainty of Lignocellulosic Biofuel Production from Energy Cane and Sweet Sorghum in South Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Juan J. Monge ,
Luis A. Ribera ,
John L. Jifon ,
Jorge A. da Silva  and
James W. Richardson
Juan J. Monge
Affiliation:
Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension, Weslaco, Texas
Luis A. Ribera
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
John L. Jifon
Affiliation:
Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension, Weslaco, Texas
Jorge A. da Silva
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences and Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension, Weslaco, Texas
James W. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Government support uncertainty, scarce yield information, and the inherent risk in bioeconomic phenomena are some of the deterrents faced by investors in the nascent cellulosic biofuel industry. A financial probabilistic model was developed to contrast the economic feasibility of producing cellulosic biofuels from energy cane and sweet sorghum using three technologies: hydrolysis, pyrolysis, and gasification. Hydrolysis and pyrolysis proved feasible (showed possibilities of a positive net present value) without government support and conditioned to stochastic feedstock yields and biofuel prices. Gasification was feasible with government support. Improved feedstock and biofuel productivity would considerably raise the feasibility probabilities for hydrolysis and pyrolysis without government support.

Keywords

cellulosic biofuelenergy canegasificationhydrolysisMonte Carlo simulationnet present valuepyrolysissweet sorghumG17Q16Q48
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , November 2014 , pp. 457 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aden, A., Ruth, M., Ibsen, K., Jechura, J., Neeves, K., Sheehan, J., Wallace, B., Montague, L., Slayton, A., and Lukas, J.. Lignocellulosic Bio-mass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover. Technical Report NREL/TP-510-32438. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummeis, T. “Energy Cane Yields in the Imperial Valley of California.” Personal Communication, 2014.Google Scholar
Chemical Week Associates. Economic Indicators. New York, NY: Chemical Engineering, August 2012.Google Scholar
Dutta, A., Talmadge, M., Hensley, J., Worley, M., Dudgeon, D., Barton, D., Groenendijk, P., Ferrari, D., Stears, B., Searcy, E.M., Wright, C.T., and Hess, J.R.. Process Design and Economics for Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Thermochemical Pathway by Indirect Gasification and Mixed Alcohol Synthesis. Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-51400. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAPRI. Renewable Fuel Standard Waiver Options During the Drought of 2012. FAPRI-MU Report 11-12. Columbia, MO: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute, 2012.Google Scholar
FAPRI. U.S. Baseline Briefing Book: Projections for Agricultural and Biofuel Markets. FAPRI-MU Report 01-13. Columbia, MO: Food and Agriculture Policy Research Institute, 2013.Google Scholar
Hamelinck, C., van Hooijdonk, G., and Faaij, A.. “Ethanol from Lignocellulosiç Biomass: Techno-Economic Performance in Short-, Middle-and Long-Term.” Biomass and Bioenergy 28(2005):384–410.Google Scholar
Haque, M., and Epplin, F.M.. “Cost to Produce Switchgrass and Cost to Produce Ethanol from Switchgrass for Several Levels of Biorefinery Investment Cost and Biomass to Ethanol Conversion Rates.” Biomass and Bioenergy 46(2012):517-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart Energy Publishing. Renewable Fuel News. Technical report. Houston, TX: Hart Energy, 2012.Google Scholar
Humbird, D., Davis, R., Tao, L., Kinchin, C., Hsu, D., Aden, A., Schoen, P., Lukas, J., Olthof, B., Worley, M., Sexton, D., and Dudgeon, D.. Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover. Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-47764. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2011.Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service. Corporations. Cat. No. 150720. Washington, DC: Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, 2012.Google Scholar
Jahangirian, M., Eldabi, T., Naseer, A., Stergioulas, L.K., and Young, T.. “Simulation in Manufacturing and Business: A Review.” European Journal of Operational Research 203(2010): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S.B., Holladay, J.E., Valkenburg, C., Stevens, D.J., Walton, C., Kinchin, C., Elliott, D.C., and Czernik, S.. Production of Gasoline and Diesel from Biomass via Fast Pyrolysis, Hydrotreating and Hydrocracking: A Design Case. Technical Report PNNL-18284 Rev. 1. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2009.Google Scholar
Jones, S.B., and Zhu, Y.. Techno-Economic Analysis for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Gasoline Via the Methanol-to-Gasoline (MTG) Process. PNNL Report 18481. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaylen, M., Van Dyne, D.L., Choi, Y.-S., and Blase, M.. “Economic Feasibility of Producing Ethanol from Lignocellulosic Feedstock.” Bioresource Technology 72(2000): 19–32.Google Scholar
Kwak, Y.H., and Ingall, L.. “Exploring Monte Carlo Simulation Applications for Project Management.” Risk Management 9(2007):44–57.Google Scholar
Linton, J.A., Miller, J.C., Little, R.D., Petrolia, D.R., and Coble, K.H.. “Economic Feasibility of Producing Sweet Sorghum as an Ethanol Feedstock in the Southeastern United States.” Biomass and Bioenergy 35(2011):3050-57.Google Scholar
Manganaro, J.L., and Lawal, A.. “Economics of Thermochemical Conversion of Crop Residue to Liquid Transportation Fuel.” Energy & Fuels 26(2012):2442-53.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, M., and Nishimura, T.. “Mersenne Twister: A 623-Dimensionally Equidistributed Uniform Pseudo-Random Number Generator.” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 8(1998):3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCutchen, B.F., Avant, R.V., and Baltensperger, D.. “High-Tonnage Dedicated Energy Crops: The Potential of Sorghum and Energy Cane.” Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the National Agricultural Biotechnology Council. Columbus, OH, 2008, pp. 119-22.Google Scholar
McKay, M.D., and Conover, W.J.. “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code.” Technometrics 21(1979):239-45.Google Scholar
Morris, B.D. “Economic Feasibility of Ethanol Production from Sweet Sorghum Juice in Texas.” Master's thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2008.Google Scholar
Outlaw, J.L., Ribera, L.A., Richardson, J.W., da Silva, J., Bryant, H., and Klose, S.L.. “Economics of Sugar-Based Ethanol Production and Related Policy Issues.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):357–63.Google Scholar
Palma, M.A., Richardson, J.W., Roberson, B.E., Ribera, L.A., Outlaw, J.L., and Munster, C.. “Economic Feasibility of a Mobile Fast Pyrolysis System for Sustainable Bio-Crude Oil Production.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 14(2011): 1–16.Google Scholar
Phillips, S., Tarad, J.K., Biddy, M.J., and Dutta, A.. Gasoline from Wood via Integrated Gasification, Synthesis, and Methanol-to-Gasoline Technologies. Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-47594. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2011.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W. Simulation for Applied Risk Management: With an Introduction to SIMETAR. Technical Report, Texas A&M University. College Station, TX: Agricultural and Food Policy Center, 2010.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Herbst, B.K., Outlaw, J.L., and Gill, R.C.. “Including Risk in Economic Feasibility Analyses: The Case of Ethanol Production in Texas.” Journal of Agribusiness 25(2007a): 115-12.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Johnson, M.D., and Outlaw, J.L.. “Economic Comparison of Open Pond Raceways to Photo Bio-Reactors for Profitable Production of Algae for Transportation Fuels in the Southwest.” Algal Research 1(2012): 93–100.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Klose, S.L., and Gray, A.W.. “An Applied Procedure for Estimating and Simulating Multivariate Empirical (MVE) Probability Distributions in Farm-level Risk Assessment and Policy Analysis.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32(2000):299–315.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Lemmer, W.J., and Outlaw, J.L.. “Bio-Ethanol Production from Wheat in the Winter Rainfall Region of South Africa: A Quantitative Risk Analysis.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 10(2007b): 181–204.Google Scholar
Richardson, J.W., Outlaw, J.L., Knapek, G.M., Raulston, J.M., Herbst, B.K., Anderson, D.P., Bryant, H.L., Klose, S.L., and Zimmel, P.. Representative Farms Economic Outlook for the January 2013 FAPRI/AFPC Baseline. Afpc working paper 13-1. College Station, TX: Agricultural and Food Policy Center, The Texas A&M University System, 2013.Google Scholar
Rio Grande Valley and Sugar Growers. Personal Communication, 2012.Google Scholar
Salassi, M.E., Brown, K.L., Deliberto, M.A., and Gravois, K.A.. 2013a. Costs of Producing Energy Cane as a Biofuel Feedstock in Louisiana. Internet site: www.lsuagcenter.com/en/communications/publications/agmag/Archive/2013/Winter/ (Accessed February 2014).Google Scholar
Salassi, M.E., Brown, K., Hilbun, B.M., Deliberto, M.A., Gravois, K.A., Mark, T.B., and Falconer, L.L.. “Farm-Dcale Cost of Producing Perennial Energy Cane as a Biofuel Feedstock.” Bioenergy Research, E-pub November 6, 2013b. DOI: 10.1007/s 12155-013-9390-8.Google Scholar
Salassi, M.E., and Deliberto, M.A.. 2013 Projected Commodity Costs and Returns: Sugarcane Production in Louisiana. Information Series 290, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Farm Research and Extension. Baton Rouge, LA: Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, 2013.Google Scholar
Schmit, T.M., Luo, J., and Conrad, J.M.. “Estimating the Influence of U.S. Ethanol Policy on Plant Investment Decisions: A Real Options Analysis with Two Stochastic Variables.” Energy Economics 33(2011): 1194-205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmit, T.M., Luo, J., and Tauer, L.W.. “Ethanol Plant Investment Using Net Present Value and Real Option Analyses.” Biomass and Bioenergy 33(2009): 1442-51.Google Scholar
Serna-Saldivar, S.O., Chuck-Hernandez, C., Perez-Carrillo, E., and Heredia-Olea, E.. Bioethanol, Chapter 3: Sorghum as a Multifunctional Crop for the Production of Fuel Ethanol: Current Status and Fuel Trends. Winchester, U.K.: InTech, February 2012, pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
Short, W., Packey, D., and Holt, T.. A Manual for the Economic Evaluation of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technologies. Technical Report NREL/TP-462-5173. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slating, T.A., and Kesan, J.P. The Renewable Fuel Standard 3.0? Moving Forward with the Federal Biofuel Mandate. Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science No. LBSS13-06. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois College of Law, 2013.Google Scholar
Song, F., Zhao, J., and Swinton, S.M.. “Switching to Perennial Energy Crops under Uncertainty and Costly Reversibility.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(2011):764–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, B. Designed to Go Above Nameplate Capacity. 2006. Internet site: www.ethanolproducer.com/articles/2463/designed-to-go-above-nameplate-capacity/ (Accessed February 2014).Google Scholar
Swanson, R.M., Satrio, J.A., Brown, R.C., Platon, A., and Hsu, D.D.. Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuels Production Based on Gasification. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-46587. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2010.Google Scholar
Tembo, G., Epplin, F.M., and Huhnke, R.L.. “Integrative Investment Appraisal of a Lignocellulosic Biomass-to-Ethanol Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28(2003):611-33.Google Scholar
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension. Estimated Costs and Returns per Acre for Sugar Cane; Plant and Ratoon Cane, Furrow Irrigation. Projected for 2012, Rio Grande Valley. Technical Report, Texas A&M University. College Station, TX: Department of Agricultural Economics, 2012.Google Scholar
Turnhollow, A.F., Webb, E.G., and Downing, M.E.. Review of Sorghum Production Practices: Applications for Bioenergy. Technical Report ORNL/TM-2010/7. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2010.Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Agency. 2012a. Petroleum & Other Liquids: Data. Internet site: www. eia.gov/petroleum/data.cfm#prices (Accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Agency. 2012b. State Energy Data System (SEDS): 1960–2011. Internet site: www.eia.gov/state/seds/seds-data-complete.cfm?sid=US (Accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Changes to Renewable Fuel Standard Program, Final Rule.” Federal Register 75(2010a): 14669–5320.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis. Technical Report EPA-420-R-10-006, Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, 2010b.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “2014 Standards for the Renewable Fuel Standard Program, Proposed Rule.” Federal Register 78(2013a):71732–84.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Identification of Additional Qualifying Renewable Fuel Pathways under the Renewable Fuel Standard Program, Final Rule.” Federal Register 78(2013b): 14190-217.Google Scholar
van der Weijde, T., Kamei, C.L.A., Torres, A.F., Vermerris, W., Dolstra, O., Visser, R.G.F., and Trindale, L.M.. “The Potential of C4 Grasses for Cellulosic Biofuel Production.” Frontiers in Plant Science 4(2013): 1–18.Google Scholar
Wang, A., and Hallal, W.. “Comparison of Real Asset Valuation Models: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Business and Management 5(2010): 14–24.Google Scholar
Wright, M., Satrio, J., Brown, R., Daugaard, D., and Hsu, D.. Techno-Economic Analysis of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis to Transportation Fuels. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-46586. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Sperow, M., and Wang, J.. “Economic Feasibility of a Woody Biomass-Based Ethanol Plant in Central Appalachia.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35(2010):522–44.Google Scholar
You, F., Tao, L., Graziano, D.J., and Snyder, S.W.. “Optimal Design of Sustainable Cellulosic Biofuel Supply Chains: Multiobjective Optimization Coupled with Life Cycle Assessment and Input—Output Analysis.” AIChE Journal, American Institute of Chemical Engineers 58(2011): 1157-80.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Izaurralde, R.C., Manowitz, D., West, T.O., Post, W.M., Thomson, A.M., , V.P., Nichols, J., and Williams, J.R.. “An Integrative Modeling Framework to Evaluate the Productivity and Sustainability of Biofuel Crop Production Systems.” GCB Bioenergy 2(2010):258-77.Google Scholar