Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:23:36.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating the Short- and Long-run Economic Impacts of the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Binzhang Liu ,
Shukla Kshirsagar ,
Thomas Johnson ,
Craig Thatcher  and
George W. Norton
Binzhang Liu
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
Shukla Kshirsagar
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
Thomas Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Missouri
Craig Thatcher
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
George W. Norton
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Colleges of veterinary medicine are often asked to provide evidence of the economic impacts of their activities. This paper presents methods for evaluating a veterinary college and applies them to the Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine. It assesses short-run impacts on income and employment using input-output analysis. Long-run benefits are estimated using a combination of economic surplus analysis, travel cost analysis and demand estimation, animal-owner willingness-to-pay based on a survey of practicing veterinarians, and earnings differentials.

Keywords

economic impact assessmenteconomic surplusinput-outputreturns to veterinary educationtravel cost method
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , April 2001 , pp. 49 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, J.M., Norton, G.W., and Pardey, P.G.. Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Ciaschini, M.Input Output Analysis: Current Developments. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clawson, M. and Knetsch, J. L.. Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Hanley, N.D. “Valuing Rural Recreation Benefits: An Empirical Comparison of Two Approaches”. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 40(1989): 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. and Kambhampathy, M.. “Virginia Tech and the Community: A Summary of the University's Economic Effects”, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, 1993.Google Scholar
KPMG Peat Marwick. “Impact Study: Exploring the Role of the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine”, report prepared for the University of Pennsylvania, 1992.Google Scholar
Micro IMPLAN Group, MIG Technical Analysis Guide, Stillwater, Minnesota, 1994.Google Scholar
Spears, A. “An Assessment of the Expenditure-Based Impact of the Atlantic Veterinary College of the University of Prince Edward Island on the Local Economy”, Department of Economics, University of Prince Edward Island, August 1995.Google Scholar
Strong, E. “A Note on the Functional Form of Travel Cost Methods With Zones of Unequal Population”. Land Economics 59(1983): 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar