Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:43:23.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Exploitation of Coal as an Engine for Growth in Eastern Kentucky – An Input-Output Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Nasser Sherafat ,
Angelos Pagoulatos  and
Kurt R. Anschel
Nasser Sherafat
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Angelos Pagoulatos
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Kurt R. Anschel
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historically, the economic problems of Appalachia have been closely linked to the problems of the coal industry, which, with its boom and bust cycles, often has intensified the conditions of poverty, unemployment, out-migration, and capital flight from the area. For more than a decade it has been national economic policy “to develop in Appalachia a self-sustaining economy capable of supporting the people with rising incomes, improving standards of living and increasing employment opportunities” [1, p. 64]. It has been widely hypothesized that this societal goal will be achieved through exogenous increases in demand for coal as the result of its substitution for other energy sources. Therefore a study was made of the impacts of the increased demand for coal on the economies of the 18 coal-producing counties in Appalachian Kentucky.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , December 1978 , pp. 81 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Appalachian Regional Commission. Annual Report, Washington. D.C, 1970.Google Scholar
[2]Appalachian Regional Commission. Appalachia, An Economic Report, Washington. D.C. 1972.Google Scholar
[3]Brockway, James M. and Spar, Michael A.. How Many Kentuckians: Population Forecasts, 1971-2020. Louisville: University of Louisville, Urban Studies Center, 1977.Google Scholar
[4]Institute for Mining and Minerals Research. Annual Report, Lexington. Kentucky, 1974.Google Scholar
[5]Miernyck, W. H. “Coal and the Future of the Appalachian Economy,” Appalachia: A Journal Devoted to the Special Problems of Regional Development, Volume 9, October-November 1975, pp. 29–31.Google Scholar
[6]Miernyck, Wilt, et al.Simulating Regional Economic Development. Lexington, Massachusetts: Heath Lexington Books, 1970.Google Scholar
[7]Miller, H. P.Trends in the Income of Families and Persons in the United States: 1947-1960. U. S. Bureau of Census, Tech. Paper 8, 1963.Google Scholar
[8]Sherafat, N. “The Impact of the Coal Industry on Output, Income and Employment in Eastern Kentucky: An Input-Output Analysis,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, 1978.Google Scholar
[9]Spencer, Milton. Contemporary Economics, 3rd ed. New York: Worth Publishing, 1977. p. 69.Google Scholar
[10]U. S. Department of Commerce. Local Area Personal Income 1969-74, Vol. 3: Southeastern States, Bureau of Economic Analysis, June 1976, pp. 233–293.Google Scholar