Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:39:00.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Influencing and Steps Leading to the Adoption of Best Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Farmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Krishna P. Paudel ,
Wayne M. Gauthier ,
John V. Westra  and
Larry M. Hall
Krishna P. Paudel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
Wayne M. Gauthier
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
John V. Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
Larry M. Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A logistic regression procedure was used to assess the impact of socioeconomic attributes on the best management practices (BMPs) adoption decision by Louisiana dairy farmers relative to cost-share and fixed incentive payments. Analysis of the steps in the BMP adoption decision process indicated visits between producers and the U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resource Conservation Service significantly increase likelihood of BMP adoption. Producer willingness-to-pay results indicate that marginal increases in dairy BMP adoption and associated improvement in environmental quality require increased technical and financial assistance.

Keywords

best management practicesbootstrapcost-sharemanuresteps in BMP adoptionQ16Q25Q53
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 203 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amacher, G.S., and Feather, P.M. “Testing Producer Perceptions of Jointly Beneficial Best Management Practices for Improved Water Quality.” Applied Economics 29(February 1997):153–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesch, D.F., Brinsfield, R.B., and Magnien, R.E. “Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication: Scientific Understanding, Ecosystem Restoration, and Challenges for Agriculture.” Journal of Environmental Quality 30(March 2001):303–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burkart, M.R., and James, D.E. “Agricultural-Nitrogen Contributions to Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico.” Journal of Environmental Quality 28(May 1999):850–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, A. “The Pursuit of Efficiency and Its Unintended Consequences: Contract Withdrawals in the Environmental Quality Incentives Program.” Review of Agricultural Economics 25(December 2003):449–69.Google Scholar
Cooper, J.C. “Combining Actual and Contingent Behavior Data to Model Farmer Adoption of Water Quality Protection Practices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 22(July 1997):30–43.Google Scholar
Cooper, J.C. “A Joint Framework for Analysis of Agri-Environmental Payment Programs.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(November 2003):976–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J.C., and Keim, R.W. “Incentive Payments to Encourage Farmer Adoption of Water Quality Protection Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(February 1996):54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVuyst, E.A., and Ipe, V.C. “A Group Incentive Contract to Promote Adoption of Best Management Practices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(December 1999):367–82.Google Scholar
Dillman, D. Mail and Internet Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.Google Scholar
Dorfman, J.H. “Modeling Multiple Adoption Decisions in a Joint Framework.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(August 1996):547–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. “Better Bootstrap Confidence Intervals.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 82(March 1987):171–85.Google Scholar
Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D. “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 33(January 1985):255–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuglie, K.O., and Bosch, D.J. “Economic and Environmental Implications of Soil Nitrogen Testing: A Switching-Regression Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(November 1995):891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J., Kim, S., and Paudel, K. “Why Don’t Producers Adopt Best Management Practices? An Analysis of the Beef Cattle Industry.” Agricultural Economics 36(January 2007):89–102.Google Scholar
Gould, W., and Hardin, J. “A Terminology Problem: Odds Ratio Versus Odds.” Internet site: http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/odds.html (Accessed December 21, 2005).Google Scholar
Henning, S.A., and Cardona, H. “An Analysis of Factors Influencing Adoption of BMPs among Louisiana Sugarcane Producers.” Paper presented at the conference of American Agricultural Economics Association, Tampa, FL, July 30–August 2, 2000.Google Scholar
Houston, J.E., and Sun, H. “Cost-Share Incentive and Best Management Practices in a Pilot Water Quality Program.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(July 1999):239–52.Google Scholar
Ipe, V.C., DeVuyst, E.A., Braden, J.B., and White, D.C. “Simulation of a Group Incentive Program for Farmer Adoption of Best Management Practices.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 30(October 2001):139–50.Google Scholar
Johansson, R.C., Gowda, P.H., Mulla, D.J., and Dalzell, B.J. “Metamodelling Phosphorus Best Management Practices for Policy Use: A Frontier Approach.” Agricultural Economics 30(January 2004):63–74.Google Scholar
Khanna, M. “Sequential Adoption of Site-Specific Technologies and Its Implication for Nitrogen Productivity: A Double Selectivity Model.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(February 2001):35–51.Google Scholar
Kim, S., Gillespie, J.M., and Paudel, K.P. “The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on the Adoption of Best Management Practices in Beef Cattle Production.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 60(2005):111–20.Google Scholar
Lin, J.Y. “Education and Innovation Adoption in Agriculture: Evidence from Hybrid Rice in China.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(August 1991):713–23.Google Scholar
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ). State of Louisiana Water Quality Management Plan, 2004 Water Quality Inventory Integrated Report, Section 305(b) and 303(d) Reports, Appendix H: Louisiana’s 2004 303(d) List. Internet site: http://www.deq.louisiana.gov/portal/Portals/O/assistance/2004AppendixHCategory5.pdf (Accessed January 25, 2007).Google Scholar
Luzar, E.J., and Diagne, A. “Participation in the Next Generation of Agriculture Conservation Programs: The Role of Environmental Attitudes.” Journal of Socioeconomics 28(1999):335–49.Google Scholar
McCann, L., and Easter, K.W. “Transaction Costs of Policies to Reduce Agricultural Phosphorous Pollution in the Minnesota River.” Land Economics 75(August 1999):402–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSweeny, W., and Shortle, J.S. “Probabilistic Cost Effectiveness in Agricultural Nonpoint Pollution Control.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 22(July 1990):95–104.Google Scholar
Poi, S. “From the Help Desk: Some Bootstrapping Technique.” Stata Journal 4(2004):312–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahelizatovo, N.C., and Gillespie, J.M. “Dairy Farm Size, Entry, and Exit in a Declining Production Region.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31(August 1999):333–47.Google Scholar
Rahelizatovo, N.C., and Gillespie, J.M. “The Adoption of Best Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Producers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(April 2004):229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahm, M.R., and Huffman, W.E. “The Adoption of Reduced Tillage: The Role of Human Capital and Other Variables.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(November 1984):405–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribaudo, M., and Agapoff, J. “Importance of Cost Offsets for Dairy Farms Meeting a Nutrient Application Standard.” Paper presented at the conference of American Agricultural Economics Association, Denver, CO, August 1–4, 2004.Google Scholar
Rudas, T. Odds Ratios in the Analysis of Contingency Tables. London: Sage Publications, 1998.Google Scholar
Soule, M.J., Tegene, A., and Wiebe, K.D. “Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(November 2000):993–1005.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.L., Adams, R.M., and Miller, S.F. “Farm-Level Response to Agricultural Effluent Control Strategies: The Case of Willamette Valley.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17(July 1992):173–85.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.K., Ladewig, H., and Mcintosh, W.A. “The Adoption of Integrated Pest Management Among Texas Cotton Growers.” Rural Sociology 55(fall 1990):395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traore, N., Landry, R., and Amara, N. “On-Farm Adoption of Conservation Practices: The Role of Farm and Farmer Characteristics, Perceptions, and Health Hazards.” Land Economics 74(February 1998):114–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentin, L., Bernardo, D.J., and Kastens, T.L. “Testing the Empirical Relationship between Best Management Practice Adoption and Farm Profitability.” Review of Agricultural Economics 26(winter 2004):489–504.Google Scholar
Wu, J., and Babcock, B.A. “The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economic and Environmental Implications.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(August 1998):494–511.Google Scholar