Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:10:36.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Which Contribute to the Financial Performance of Selected Tennessee Dairies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Kimberly L. Haden  and
Larry A. Johnson
Kimberly L. Haden
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee
Larry A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Extension Agricultural Economics and Resource Development, University of Tennessee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify factors which contributed to the financial performance of 81 selected dairy farms in Tennessee. The study analyzes several measures of financial performance including cash farm income, net farm income, and returns to operator labor and management. Regressions with ten explanatory variables were used to determine factors that explained the variation in the measures of financial performance. Production per cow, number of cows, price received for milk, forage costs, and level of debt use appeared to influence financial performance.

Keywords

financial performancedairy operation
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , July 1989 , pp. 105 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bratton, C.A. “Dairy Management and New York Farm Incomes.” A.E. Research.84-6, Dept. of Agr. Econ., Cornell Univ., 1982.Google Scholar
Carley, D. “Silage-Concentrate Substitution: Effects on Milk Production and Income Over Feed Cost in DHIA Herds.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 55(1973):641–646.Google Scholar
Carley, D., and Fletcher, S.. “An Evaluation of Management Practices Used by Southern Dairy Farmers.” J. Dairy. Sci., 69 (1986):2458–2464.Google Scholar
Collins, Robert A. “Expected Utility, Debt-Equity Structure, and Risk Balancing.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):627–629.Google Scholar
Dahlgran, R. “A Synthesis of Microeconomic Duality Theory and Distributed Lag Modeling With Implications for U.S. Dairy.Policy.” No. Cent. J. Agr. Econ., 7(1985):132–144.Google Scholar
Garland, C. “Guideline for Recordkeeping.” A.E. and R.D. Publication.38, Agr. Ext. Service, Univ. of Tennessee, 1986.Google Scholar
Garland, C. “Tennessee's Resource Management Program.” Publication 840, Agr. Ext. Service, Univ. of Tennessee, April 1980.Google Scholar
Grisley, W., and Mascarenhas, J.. “Operating Cost Efficiency on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms.” No. East. J. Agr. and Res. Econ., 14(1985):88–95.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J., and Tauer, L., “Successful Dairy Farm Management Strategies Identified by Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Farm Records.” No. East. J. Agr. and Res. Econ., 15(1986):168–177.Google Scholar
Lines, A., and Morehart, M.. “Financial Health of U.S. Farm.Business in 1984: A Region, Type, and Size Analysis.” Agr. Finance Rev., 47(1987):43–52.Google Scholar
Lins, D., Ellinger, P., and Lattz, D.. “Measurement of Financial Stress in Agriculture.” Agr. Finance Rev., 47(1987):53–61.Google Scholar
Matulich, S. “Efficiencies in Large Scale Dairying: Incentives for Future Structural Change.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 60 (1978):642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melichar, E. “Capital Gains Versus Current Income in the Farming Sector.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 60(1979):1085–1092.Google Scholar
Seger, D.J., and Lins, D.A.. “Cash Versus Accrual Measures of Farm Income.” No. Cent. J. Agr. Econ., 8(1986):219–226.Google Scholar
Tauer, L., and Belbase, K.. “Technical Efficiency of New York Dairy Farms.” No. East. J. Agr.and Res. Econ., 16(1985):10–16.Google Scholar
Tennessee Department of Agriculture. Tennessee Dairy Statistics: Annual Dairy Summary, 1985.Google Scholar
U.S. Department.of Agriculture, ERS. Dairy Situation and Outlook Report. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., various issues.Google Scholar
Univ. of Tennessee Agr. Ext. Service and Tennessee Valley Authority. Farm Business Survey. TVA Resource Management Program, 1983-1986.Google Scholar
Weston, F.J., and Brigham, E.F.. Managerial Economics. 6th ed. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Whipple, G. “Grade A Milk Production in Tennessee.” Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 632, Univ. of Tennessee, 1986.Google Scholar