Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:09:14.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Farm Level Corn Acreage Response Estimation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Perry J. Nutt ,
Michael R. Reed  and
Jerry R. Skees
Perry J. Nutt
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Michael R. Reed
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Jerry R. Skees
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study reports results of an acreage supply equation using individual farm data and develops implications for bias introduced by use of aggregate data. The analysis shows that use of aggregate acreage response models underestimates the absolute value of price elasticities and the lagged adjustment process. Further, aggregated analyses cannot incorporate some variables found to be important in explaining from level acreage response.

Keywords

acreage responseaggregation biasindividual farms
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , December 1986 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Held, L. J..and Helmers, G. A.. “Growth and Survival of Nebraska Panhandle Wheat Farms Under Selected Financial Conditions.” Nebraska Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 295, 1980.Google Scholar
Houck, J. P..and Ryan, M. E.. “Supply Analysis for Corn in the United States: The Impact of Changing Government Programs.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 54,2(1972):184–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kentucky Crop Reporting Service. Kentucky Agricultural Statistics. Louisville, Kentucky, various issues.Google Scholar
Kmenta, J. Elements of Econometrics. New York: MacMillan Co., 1971.Google Scholar
Law, A. M..and Kelton, W. D.. Simulation Modelling and Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
Morzuch, B. J., Weaver, R. D., and Helmberger, P. G.. “Wheat Acreage Supply Response Under Changing Farm Programs.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 62,1(1980):29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, G. F..and Eisgruber, L. M.. “The Impact of Managerial Ability and Capital Structure on Farm Firm Growth.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 50,3(1968):491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M. R..and Riggins, S. K.. “A Disaggregated Analysis of Corn Acreage Response in Kentucky.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63,4(1981):708–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. W. and Nixon, C. J.. The Farm Level Income and Policy Simulation: FLIPSIM. Dept. of Agr. Econ., Texas A & M University Tech. Report 81-2. 1981.Google Scholar
Skees, J. R..“Comparing Objective and Subjective Yield Estimates: An Empirical Study in Western Kentucky.” Paper presented to the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Orlando, Florida; February 2-5, 1986.Google Scholar
Skees, J. R.. “FLOSSIM: A Multiple-Farm Opportunity Set Simulation Model” in Modelling Farm Decisions for Policy Analysis, eds. Baum, K. H., and Schern, L. P.. Boulder, Colorado; Westview Press. 1983.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture. Feed Situation. Washington, D. C. various issues.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R.. Microeconomic Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton Co., 1978.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. K..and Bancroft, R. L.. “Corn Acreage Response-Function Estimation with Pooled Time-Series and Cross-Sectional Data.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 61,3(1979):551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar