Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:05:32.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Financial Analysis of a Proposed Large-Scale Ethanol Cogeneration Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Gregory D. Hanson*
Affiliation:
Economic Indicators Research and Income Forecasts, Economic Indicators Branch, Economic Research Service, USDA

Abstract

Financial analysis of an ethanol/electricity cogeneration plant indicates a rapid payback of investment and a high internal rate of return. This is primarily because cogeneration of steam for generation of electricity and biomass conversion to ethanol results in increased engineering efficiency compared to alternative ethanol alone production processes. Economic sensitivity testing included alternative price levels, interest rates, capacities, costs, and a “stand alone” case with no federal government excise tax subsidies. Supply and price analyses suggest the procurement of locally produced feedstock in Alabama and surrounding states is feasible. The robustness of the economic analysis provides support for consideration of ethanol cogeneration as a currently feasible strategy to utilize excess agricultural production capacity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcohol Outlook, Information Resources Inc., Washington, D.C.; March, 1984.Google Scholar
Alcohol Outlook, Information Resources Inc., Washington, D.C.; December, 1984.Google Scholar
Arnette, M. L., Hammig, M. D., Wise, M. L., and Jordan, J. W.. “Feasibility of On-Farm Ethanol Production in South Carolina.” Paper presented at Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida; February, 1982.Google Scholar
Brown, L. R.Food or Fuel: New Competition for the World's Cropland.” Worldwatch Paper 35, Worldwatch Institute, March, 1980.Google ScholarPubMed
Browning, E. W. and Briggs, D. E.. “The Economics of Cogeneration at Large Central Power Plants Case Study.The Engineering Economist, 28(1982):5369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffin, H. S.. Energy Distribution Systems of Alabama, Geological Survey of Alabama, Circular 98, 1976.Google Scholar
Christensen, D. A., Turhollow, A. F. Jr., Hardy, E. O., and English, B. C.. “Soil Loss Associated with Alcohol Production form Corn Grain and Corn Residue.” CARD Rep. 115, Center for Agr. and Rur. Dev., Iowa State University; January, 1983.Google Scholar
Commoner, B.Ethanol.The New Yorker; October 10, 1983.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. and Harrington, D. H.. “The Future Productive Capacity of U.S. Agriculture: Economic, Technological, Resource, and Institutional Determination.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 66(1984):585591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. H.Alcohol Fuels in the U.S.: Status and Prospects.Outlook and Situation: Inputs; ERS/USDA IOS-5; August, 1984.Google Scholar
Harmon Engineering and Testing. “Order-of-Magnitude Economic Study for a Fuel Alcohol Facility Near the McWilliams Power Plant.” Paper prepared for Alabama Electric Cooperative; Auburn, Alabama; June, 1981.Google Scholar
Harmon Engineering and Testing. “Market Survey for a Fuel Alcohol Plant Near the McWilliams Power Generating Plant.” Paper prepared for Alabama Electric Cooperative; Auburn, Alabama; July, 1981.Google Scholar
Harmon Engineering and Testing. “Technical Feasibility Study for a Fuel Alcohol Plant.”Paper prepared for Alabama Electric Cooperative; Auburn, Alabama; January, 1982.Google Scholar
Hertzmark, D., Flaim, S., Ray, D., and Parvin, G.. “Economic Feasibility of Agricultural Alcohol Production Within a Biomass System.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 62(1980):965970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertzmark, D., Ray, D., and Richardson, J.. “Economic Impacts of Ethanol Fuels from Crops.Solar Energy Research Institute; Golden, Colorado; August, 1981.Google Scholar
Kiker, C. and Bauman, E.. “Producer Gas Fueled Irrigation: Evaluating the Potential of a Technology.So. J. Agr. Econ., 16,2(1984):127134.Google Scholar
Leiner, F. T. and Braden, J. B.. “The Small-Scale Ethanol Production Enterprise: Arrangements and Economics.” Dept. of Agr. Econ., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; September, 1981.Google Scholar
Litterman, M., Eidman, V., and Jensen, H.. “Economics of Gasohol.” Dept. of Agr. and Applied Econ., Econ. Rep. ER78-10, University of Minnesota; December, 1978.Google Scholar
Meekhof, R. L., Tyner, W. E., and Holland, F. A.. “U.S. Agricultural Policy and Gasohol: A Policy Simulation.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 62(1980):408415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sama, Dominik A.Biomass to Ethanol Has Merit.Hydrocarbon Processing; July, 1981.Google Scholar
Sanderson, F. H.Benefits and Costs of the U.S. Gasohol Program.” Paper 67, Resources for the Future; July, 1981.Google Scholar
Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation. “Preliminary Economic Evaluation Nebraska Grain Alcohol Plant.” Paper prepared for the State of Nebraska Agr. Products Industrial Utilization Committee; December, 1976.Google Scholar
Teixerira, A. A.Industrial Cogeneration of Electricity.Agricultural Engineering; January, 1980.Google Scholar
Tyner, W. E. and Bottum, J. C.. “Agricultural Energy Production: Economic and Policy Issues.” Dept. of Agr. Econ., Indiana Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 240; Purdue University, September, 1979.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Inventory of Power Plants in the United States, U.S. Department of Energy, Annual, 1980.Google Scholar