Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:48:36.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forward Contracting Versus Hedging Under Price and Yield Uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Stephen E. Miller*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Clemson University

Abstract

Although apparently preferred by farmers to direct hedging as a forward pricing mechanism, forward contracting has received little attention in the literature dealing with optimal forward pricing levels. An often-cited reason for producer preference for forward contracting is the absence of basis risks under that forward pricing alternative. This paper presents models of optimal forward contracting and hedging under price and yield uncertainty within a mean-variance framework. The results indicate that basis certainty does not explain preferences for forward contracting.

Type
Submitted Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. W. and Danthine, J. P.. “Hedger Diversity in Futures Markets.The Econ. J., 93(1983):370389.Google Scholar
Barry, P. J. and Willmann, D. R.. “A Risk-Programming Analysis of Forward Contracting with Credit Constraints.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58,1(1976):6270.Google Scholar
Bohrnstedt, G. W. and Goldberger, A. S.. “On the Exact Covariance of Products of Random Variables.J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., 64(1969):1,4391,442.Google Scholar
Commodity Futures Trading Commission. “1977 Report on Farmers' Use of Futures Markets and Forward Contracts.” Mimeographed paper, 1978.Google Scholar
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology. Clemson University. “Marketing Highlights.” various issues.Google Scholar
Harris, H. M..and Miller, S. E.. “An Analysis of Cash Contracting Corn and Soybeans in South Carolina.National Conference on Grain Marketing Patterns, Tennessee Valley Authority, Circular Z-173, 1981.Google Scholar
Harris, K. S..and Baker, C. B.. “Does Hedging Increase Credit for Illinois Crop Farmers.No. Cent. J. Agr. Econ., 3(1981):4752.Google Scholar
Heifner, R. G., Driscoll, J. L., Helmuth, J. W., Leath, M. N., Niernburger, F. F., and Wright, B. H.. “The U.S. Cash Grain Trade in 1974: Participants, Transactions, and Information Services.USDA, ERS, Agricultural Economics Report No. 386, 1977.Google Scholar
Heifner, R. G..“Minimum Risk Pre-Harvest Sales of Soybeans.” Mimeographed paper, USDA, 1978.Google Scholar
Kahl, K. H..“Determination of the Recommended Hedging Ratio.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65,3(1983):603605.Google Scholar
Kenyon, D. E..“Farmers' Guide to Trading Agricultural Commodity Options.USDA, ERS, Agricultural Information Bulletin No. 463, 1984.Google Scholar
Kroll, Y., Levy, H., and Markowitz, H. M.. “Mean-Variance Versus Direct Utility Maximization.J. Finance, 39(1984):4761.Google Scholar
McKinnon, R. I..“Futures Markets, Buffer Stocks, and Income Stability for Primary Producers.J. Political Economy, 57(1967):844861.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. D..“Forward and Futures Contracts as Preharvest Commodity Marketing Instruments.Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 67,3(1985):1523 Google Scholar
Rolfo, J.Optimal Hedging Under Price and Quantity Uncertainty: The Case of a Cocoa Producer.J Political Economy, 88(1980):100116.Google Scholar
South Carolina Crop Reporting Service. “South Carolina Crop Statistics.” various issues.Google Scholar
The State. Columbia, South Carolina, various issues.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. “Cotton Market News.” various issues.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal. New York, various issues.Google Scholar