Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:54:12.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fresh-Cut Melon—The Money Is in the Juice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Carlos Mayen ,
Maria I. Marshall  and
Jayson Lusk
Carlos Mayen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Maria I. Marshall
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Jayson Lusk
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fruit is an important component of the food industry in the United States, and “fresh-cut” products are an increasing portion of that consumption. We found that packaging and juice content played a significant role in the choices Indiana consumers made when purchasing fresh-cut melon products. Brand was not as important as the other fresh-cut melon attributes. Indiana consumers had a clear dislike for cup-shaped transparent packages compared with tamper-proof, bowl, and squared packages. However, they were willing to pay a premium for packages that have no fruit juices on the bottom.

Keywords

conjointconsumer preferencesdemandfruitQ13D12M31P46
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 597 - 609
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, S., Thompson, K.E., and Engelken, J.. “Mapping the Values Driving Organic Food Choice: Germany vs. the U.K.” European Journal of Marketing 38(2004):995–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batseil, R., and Louviere, J.. “Experimental Analysis of Choice.” Marketing letters 2(1991):199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Akiva, M., and Lerman, S.. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Boston: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R., and Moskowitz, H.. “The Marriage of Graphic Design & Research—Experimentally Designed Packages Offer New Vistas and Opportunities.” Paper presented at Advertising and Consumer Psychology: Visual Persuasion Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, May, 2000.Google Scholar
Boyle, K.J., Holmes, T.P., Teisl, M.F., and Roe, B.. “A Comparison of Conjoint Analysis Response Formats.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(May 2001):441-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrzan, K., and Orme, B.. “An Overview and Comparison of Design Strategies for Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.” Working paper, Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, 2000.Google Scholar
Cook, , Roberta, L. “The U.S. Fresh Produce Industry: An Industry in Transition.” Post-harvest Technology of Horticultural Crops, Kader, A. ed., University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Publication 3311, 2001.Google Scholar
Dantas, M.I.S., Deliza, R., Minim, V.P.R., and Hedderley, D.. “Consumer Intention to Purchase for Minimally Processed Cabbage.” Ciêcia e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Campinas 25(October/December 2005):762-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enneking, Ulrich. “Willingness-to-Pay for Safety Improvements in the German Meat Sector: the Case of the Q&S Label.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 31(2004):205-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillion, L., and Kilcast, D.. “The Meaning of Freshness in Fruit and Vegetables: A Preliminary Study.” Paper presented at the Fourth Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium Conference, Dijon, France, July 22-36, 2001.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000.Google Scholar
Harker, F.R., Gunson, F.A., and Jaeger, S.R.. “The Case for Fruit Quality: An Interpretive Review of Consumer Attitudes and Preferences for Apples.” Postharvest Biology and Technology 28(2003):333-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IFPA (International Fresh-Cut Produce Association). “The International Fresh-Cut Industry.” Alexandria, Virginia: International Fresh-Cut Produce Association, 2004.Google Scholar
Jaeger, S.R., and Harker, F.R.. “Consumer Evaluation of Novel Kiwifruit: Willingness to Pay.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85(2005):2519-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krinsky, I., and Robb, L.A.. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68(1986):715-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, K. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory,” Journal of Political Economy 74(1966):132-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loader, R. “Conjoint Analysis of Fresh Fruit Purchasing: A Report on a Survey.” Mimeo. Reading, UK: University of Reading, 1990.Google Scholar
Louviere, Jordan. Analyzing Decision Making Metric Conjoint Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louviere, J., Hensher, D., and Swait, J.. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications, 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, C.M., Jaeger, S.R., Amos, R.L., Brook, P.-field, and Harker, F.R.. “Tradeoffs between Emotional and Sensory Perceptions of Freshness Influence the Price Consumers Will Pay for Apples: Results from an Experimental Market.” Postharvest Biology and Technology 41(2006):172-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, J., and Norwood, B.. “Effect of Experimental Design on Choice-Based Conjoint Valuation Estimates.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(August 2005):771-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lusk, J., and Schroeder, T.. “Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(May 2004):467-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, D.R., Lusk, J., and Daniel, M.. “Recruiting Agricultural Economics Graduate Students: Student Demand for Program Attributes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(February 2004):175-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Lynne. “Fresh-Cut Category Bearing Fruit.” Supermarket News, August, 2003.Google Scholar
Roe, B., Sporleder, T., and Belleville, B.. “Hog Producer Preferences for Marketing Contract Attributes.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(February 2004):115-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roosen, J., Fox, J.A., Hennessy, D.A., and Schreiber, A.. “Consumers’ Valuation of Insecticide Use Restrictions: An Application to Apples.” Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics 23(December 1998):367-84.Google Scholar
Shwedel, K., and Costa, F.. “U.S. Fruits and Vegetables: Adjusting the Business Model in 2004.” 2005 North American Food and Agribusiness Outlook. New York: Rabobank International, 2005.Google Scholar
Steenkamp, J. “Conjoint Measurement in Ham Quality Evaluation.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 38(July 1987):473-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G.D., and Wilson, P.N.. “Market Demands for Bagged, Refrigerated Salads.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(December 1999):463-81.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau, Internet site: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18000.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture—Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS), Internet site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/FoodConsumption/FoodAvailSpreadsheets.htm.Google Scholar
Van der Pol, M., and Ryan, M.. “Using Conjoint Analysis to Establish Consumer Preferences for Fruit and Vegetables.” British Food Journal 98(1996):5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar