Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:26:29.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Beef Quality on Market Signals Transmitted by Grid Pricing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Heather C. Johnson  and
Clement E. Ward
Heather C. Johnson
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Clement E. Ward
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Value-based marketing is shaping cattle production; however, market signals differ dramatically depending on carcass quality. This study applies a two-stage coefficients of separate determination procedure to four regional fed cattle datasets sorted by grid value and by carcass quality attributes. Weight is the strongest signal sent when higher valued cattle and better quality cattle are sold on a grid. Quality characteristics send stronger signals when lower valued cattle and poorer quality cattle are sold on a grid. Producers of lower quality cattle can potentially gain $52 to $149 per head by improving quality and $113 to $150 per head by adding weight.

Keywords

beef cattlecarcass qualitycoefficients of separate determinationincentivesmarket signalsvalue-based marketingQ11Q13
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , April 2006 , pp. 77 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.D. and Zeuli, K.A.. “The Revenue Risk of Value-Based Pricing for Fed Cattle: A Simulation of Grid vs. Average Pricing.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4(2001): 275-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capps, O.J. and Schmitz, J.D.. “A Recognition of Health and Nutrition factors in Food Demand Analysis.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16(1991): 21–35.Google Scholar
Cooper, R., Klopfenstein, T., Milton, T., and Feuz, D.. Feedlot Marketing/Sorting Systems to Reduce Carcass Discounts. Internet Site: http:// ianrpubs.unl.edu/beef/report/mp71-23.htm Accessed: December 1, 2003.Google Scholar
Ezekiel, M. and Fox, K.A.. Methods of Correlation and Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
Fausti, S.W., Feuz, D.M., and Wagner, J.J.. “Value Based Marketing for Fed Cattle: A Discussion of the Issues.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 1(1998): 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausti, S.W. and Qasmi, B.A.. “Does the producer have an incentive to sell fed cattle on a grid?” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 5(2002): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuz, D.M. “Economic Implications of Show List, Pen Level, and Individual Animal Pricing of Fed Cattle.” Research Bulletin 1–99: Formula Pricing and Grid Pricing Fed Cattle—Implications for Price Discovery and Variability. Ward, C.E., Feuz, D.M., and Schroeder, T.C.. eds. Blacksburg, VA: Research Institute on Livestock Pricing, 1999a.Google Scholar
Feuz, D.M. “Market Signals in Value-Based Pricing Premiums and Discounts.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24(1999b): 327–41.Google Scholar
Feuz, D.M., Fausti, S.W., and Wagner, J.J.. “An Analysis of the Efficiency of Four Marketing Methods for Slaughter Cattle.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 9(1993): 453-63.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feuz, D.M., Fausti, S.W., and Wagner, J.J.. “Risk and Market Participant Behavior in the U.S. Slaughter Cattle Market.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20(1995): 22–31.Google Scholar
Forristall, C., May, G., and Lawrence, J.. “Assessing the Cost of Beef Quality.” NCR-134 Conference on Applied Market Forecasting, Risk Management, and Commodity Marketing, April 2002.Google Scholar
Greer, H.C., Trapp, J.N., and Ward, C.E.. “Impact of Alternative Grid Pricing Structures on Cattle Marketing Decisions.” NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management, April 2000.Google Scholar
Johnson, H.C. and Ward, C.E.. “Market Signals Transmitted by Grid Pricing.” Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics 30(2005): 561–579.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W., Xiao, H., Hsia, C.J., and Jackson, J.D.. “Effects of Health Information and Generic Advertising on U.S. Meat Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1997): 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R.A. and Schroeder, T.C.. “Fed Cattle Profit Determinants Under Grid Pricing.” Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics 35(2003): 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, W.Measure of Changes in Demand for Beef, Pork, and Chicken, 1975-2000. Blacksburg, VA: Research Institute on Livestock Pricing, Virginia Tech, December 2000.Google Scholar
Schroeder, T.C. and Graff, J.L.. “Estimated Value of Increased Pricing Accuracy for Fed Cattle.” Review of Agricultural Economics 22(2000): 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, T.C., Ward, C.E., Lawrence, J., and Feuz, D.M.. Cattle Marketing Trends and Concerns: Cattle Feeder Survey Results. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, June 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, G.C., Savell, J.W., Clayton, R.R., Field, T.G., Griffin, D.B., Hale, D.S., Miller, M.F., Montgomery, T.H., Morgan, J.B., Tatum, J.D., and Wise, J.W.. Improving the Consistency and Competitiveness of Beef. A Blueprint for Total Quality Management in the Fed Beef Industry. The Final Report of the National Beef Quality Audit— 1991. Englewood, CO: National Cattleman's Association, 1992.Google Scholar
Smith, G.C., Savell, J.W., Montgomery, T.H., Morgan, J.B., McKenna, D.R., Roebert, D.L., Bates, P.K., Schmidt, T.B., Hale, D.S., Griffin, D.B., Brooks, J.C., and Belk, K.E.. Improving the Quality, Consistency, Competitiveness, and Market—Share of Fed-Beef. The Final Report of the Third Blueprint for Total Quality Management in the Fed-Beef (Slaughter Steer/Heifer) Industry. Englewood, CO: National Cattleman's Association, 2000.Google Scholar
Texas A&M University. National Beef Quality Audit—2000. Internet Site: http://aggiemeat.tamu.edu/quality/NBQApresentation.ppt Accessed: February 3, 2004.Google Scholar
Unnevehr, L.J. and Bard, S.. “Beef Quality: Will Consumers Pay for Less Fat?” Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics 18(1993): 288-95.Google Scholar
USDA-AMS. National Weekly Direct Slaughter Cattle—Premiums and Discounts. Internet Site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/LM_CT155.txt Accessed: November 1, 2004.Google Scholar