Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:36:52.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Production Changes on Income and Environmental Risk in the Southern High Plains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Harry P. Mapp
Harry P. Mapp*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Regional and farm-level analyses are conducted to evaluate the economic and environmental impacts of water quality protection policies. The regional analysis evaluates reducing nitrate losses by reducing per-acre nitrogen use, taxing nitrogen use, taxing irrigation water use, and reducing furrow irrigation. Incentives to convert furrow systems to sprinkler and LEPA systems outperform the other policies. The firm-level analysis derives farm plans that limit the expected values of environmental indices for nitrates and pesticides, and reduce the probability that specified targets will be exceeded. The analysis demonstrates the importance of evaluating environmental risk as a stochastic process.

Keywords

converting irrigation systemsenvironmental riskenvironmental risk modelsregional environmental analysistaxing irrigation watertaxing nitrogen use
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , August 1999 , pp. 263 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Helfand, G.E. and House, B.W.. “Regulating Non-point Source Pollution Under Heterogeneous Conditions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(November 1995): 1024–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S.L., Adams, R.M., and Perry, G.M.. “The On-Farm Costs of Reducing Groundwater Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991):1063–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R.L., Maizei, M.S., and Goss, D.W.. Agricultural Chemical Use and Groundwater Quality: Where Are the Potential Problem Areas? Washington, D.C: Soil Conservation Service, USDA, 1992.Google Scholar
Lee, L.K. “Groundwater Quality and Farm Income: What Have We Learned?” Review of Agricultural Economics 20(1998): 168–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, R.A., Knisel, W.G., and Still, D.A.. “GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems.” Trans. ASAE 30(1987): 1403–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapp, H.P., Bernardo, D.J., Sabbagh, G.J.. Geleta, S., Watkins, K.B., Elliott, R.L.. and Stone, J.F.. “Economic and Environmental Impacts of Limiting Nitrogen Use to Protect Water Quality: A Stochastic Regional Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(November 1994): 889:903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E.G. and Lee, L.K.. “The Magnitude and Costs of Groundwater Contamination From Agricultural Chemicals.” Agricultural Economics Reporter 576, Washington, D.C: USDA, ERS, 1987.Google Scholar
Randhir, T.O. and Lee, J.G.. “Economic and Water Quality Impacts of Reducing Nitrogen and Pesticide Use in Agriculture.” Agricultural Resources and Economics Review 26(April 1997): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, G.J., Geleta, S., Elliott, R.L., Williams, J.R., and Griggs, R.H.. “Modification of EPIC to Simulate Pesticide Activities: EPIC-PST.” Trans. ASAE 34(1991):1683–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M.L., Adams, R.M., and Miller, S.F.. “Farm-Level Response to Agricultural Effluent Control Strategies: The Case of the Willamette Valley.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17(1992):173–185.Google Scholar
Teague, M.L., Bernardo, D.J., and Mapp, H.P.. “Farm-Level Economic Analysis Incorporating Stochastic Environmental Risk Assessment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(February 1995):8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teague, M.L., Bernardo, D.J., and Mapp, H.P.. “Meeting Environmental Goals Efficiently on a Farm-Level Basis.” Review of Agricultural Economics 17(1995):37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A.C., and Boisvert, R.N.. The Bioeconomics of Regulating Nitrates in Groundwater from Agricultural Production Through Taxes, Quantity Restrictions, and Pollution Permits. Department of Agricultural, Resources, and Management. Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, R. B. 95-06, November 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Pesticide Survey Phase I Report. Washington, DC, EPA 570/9/90-003, September 1990.Google Scholar
Williams, J.R., Jone, C.A.. and Dyke, P.T.. “EPIC, the Erosion Productivity Index Calculator.” Model Documentation, Vol. 1. Temple, TX: USDA, ARS, 1988.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Teague, M.L., Mapp, H.P.. and Bernardo, D.J.. “An Empirical Analysis of the Relative Efficiency of Policy Instruments to Reduce Nitrate Water Pollution in the U.S. Southern. High Plains.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 43(1995):403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar