Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:41:34.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Issues and Problems in Agricultural Water Demand Estimation from Secondary Data Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Gary D. Lynne
Gary D. Lynne*
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Economists have a continued and justified interest in agricultural water demand estimation. Water is becoming a scarce resource throughout much of the United States, even in “water abundant” eastern states such as Florida. As a result, new water institutions are evolving to address the water allocation problems. Estimates of values in alternative uses are important information in these water allocation decision processes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , December 1978 , pp. 101 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Anderson, Raymond L., Yaron, Dan, and Young, Robert. Models Designed to Efficiently Allocate Irrigation Water Use Based on Crop Response to Soil Moisture Stress, Technical Report 8, Environmental Research Center, Colorado State University, May 1977, 82 pp.Google Scholar
[2]Beattie, Bruce R. “Marginal Value Productivity of Water in Irrigated Agriculture: A Modification of the Ruttan Approach,” Western Agricultural Economics Association 44th Annual Meeting, Squaw Valley, California, 1971, pp. 109–112.Google Scholar
[3]Brown, William G. and Beattie, Bruce R.. “Improving Estimates of Economic Parameters by Use of Ridge Regression with Production Function Applications,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 57, February 1975, pp. 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Economic Research Service. Our Land and Water Resources. Current and Prospective Supplies and Uses, Miscellaneous Publication 1290, USDA, May 1974.Google Scholar
[5]Gordon, H. Scott. “The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery.” Journal of Political Economy, Volume 65, 1954, pp. 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Heady, Earl O., Madsen, Howard C., Nicol, Kenneth J., and Hargrove, Stanely H.. “National and Interregional Models of Water Demand, Land Use, and Agricultural Policies,” Water Resources Research, Volume 9, August 1973, pp. 777–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Heady, Earl O. and Tweeten, Luther. Resource Demand and Structure of the Agricultural Industry. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Hoch, Irving. “Book Review: The Economic Demand for Irrigated Acreage: New Methodology and Some Preliminary Projections, 1954-1980,” by Vernon W. Ruttan, Natural Resources Journal, Volume 7, 1967, pp. 466–471.Google Scholar
[9]Hoch, Irving. “Estimation of Production Function Parameters Combining Time-Series and Cross-Sectional Data,” Econometrica, Volume 30, January 1962, pp. 34–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Mapp, Harry P. Jr., Eidman, Vernon R., Stone, John F., and Davidson, James M.. Simulating Soil Water and Atmospheric Stress-Crop Yield Relationships for Economic Analysis, Technical Bulletin T-140, Agricultural Experiment Station, Oklahoma State University, February 1975, 63 pp.Google Scholar
[11]Miller, Stanley O., Boersma, Larry L., and Castle, Emery N.: Irrigation Water Values in the Williamette Valley: A Study of Alternative Valuation Methods, Technical Bulletin 85, Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis, Oregon, September 1965.Google Scholar
[12]Minhas, B. S., Parikh, K. S., and Srinivasen, T. N.. “Toward the Structure of a Production Function for Wheat Yields with Dated Inputs of Irrigation Water,” Water Resources Research, Volume 10, June 1974, pp. 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Mosak, J. “Interrelations of Production, Price, and Derived Demand,” Journal of Political Economy, Volume 46, December 1938, pp. 761–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Mundlak, Y. “Elasticities of Substitution and the Theory of Derived Demand,” Review of Economic Studies, Volume 2, 1968, pp. 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Parker, G. “Water and Water Problems in the Southwest Florida Water Management District and Some Possible Solution,” Water Resources Bulletin, Volume 11, February 1975, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Reitz, H. J.Water Requirements for Citrus, WRC-4, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 1977.Google Scholar
[17]Rogers, J. S. and Harrison, D. S.. Irrigation Water Requirements for Agronomic Crops in Florida, WRC-5, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 1977.Google Scholar
[18]Ruttan, Vernon W.The Economic Demand for Irrigated Acreage; New Methodology and Some Preliminary Projections, 1954-1980. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1965.Google Scholar
[19]Storch, W. “Water Management During Drought Events,” In Depth Report 2. West Palm Beach, Florida: Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District, April 1974.Google Scholar
[20]Trelease, F. J. “The Model Water Code, the Wise Administrator and the Goddam Bureaucrat,” Natural Resources Journal, Volume 14, April 1974, pp. 207–229.Google Scholar
[21]U. S. Crop Reporting Board. Agricultural Prices, 1969 Annual Summary PR 1-3(70), Washington, D.C, June 1970.Google Scholar
[22]Wadley, J. B. “A Summary Guide to Florida's Water Rights,” Extension Circular 412, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 1976.Google Scholar
[23]Wolman, N.The Value of Water in Alternative Uses. Albuquerque, New Mexico: The University of New Mexico Press, 1962, 426 pp.Google Scholar