Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:38:47.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land Conversion, Interspecific Competition, and Bioinvasion in a Tropical Ecosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Edward B. Barbier
Edward B. Barbier*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics & Finance, University of Wyoming, WY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationships among land-use change, biological invasion, and interspecific competition in a tropical ecosystem by linking a behavioral model of land conversion by agriculture and an ecological model of interspecific competition between a native species and an exotic invader. The model is used to examine how relative farm prices and access to forest areas influence land clearing and thus the ability of the invasive species to eliminate the native species. Simulations show that only a 20% rise in relative prices and a 2.75% increase in forest access are necessary for this outcome to occur.

Keywords

biological invasioninterspecific competitionland clearingtropical ecosystemtropical forestO13Q20Q24
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue s1 , October 2007 , pp. 133 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbier, E.B. “A Note on the Economics of Biological Invasions.” Ecological Economics 39(2001): 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E.B. “Institutional Constraints and Deforestation: An Application to Mexico.” Economic Inquiry 40(3)(2002):508–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E.B.Natural Resources and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E.B., and Burgess, J.C.. “The Economics of Tropical Deforestation.” Journal of Economic Surveys 15(3)(2001):413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.H., and Lomolino, M.V.. Biogeography, 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 1998.Google Scholar
Burnett, K., Kaiser, B., Pitafi, B.A., and Roumasset, J.. “Prevention, Eradication, and Containment of Invasive Species: Illustrations from Hawaii.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35(1)(2006):63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomitz, K.M., Buys, P., De Luca, G., Thomas, T.S., and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.. At Loggerheads? Agricultural Expansion, Poverty Reduction, and Environment in the Tropical Forests. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.Google Scholar
Cropper, M., Puri, J., and Griffiths, C.. “Predicting the Location of Deforestation: The Role of Roads and Protected Areas in Northern Thailand.” Land Economics 77(2)(2001):172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). State of the World's Forests 1997. Rome: FAO, 1997.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Forest Resources Assessment 2000: Main Report. FAO Forestry Paper 140. Rome: FAO, 2001.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). State of the World's Forests 2003. Rome: FAO, 2003.Google Scholar
Kaimowitz, D., and Angelsen, A.. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research, 1998.Google Scholar
Lozon, J.D., and Maclsaac, H.J.. “Biological Invasions: Are They Dependent on Disturbance?” Environmental Reviews 5(1997):131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F.A.. “Biotic Invasions: Causes, Epidemiology, Global Consequences and Control.” Ecological Applications 10(3)(2000):689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, A.T. “Predicting the Geography of Species' Invasions via Ecological Niche Modeling.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 78(4)(2003):419–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhode, K. “Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: The Search for the Primary Cause.” Oikos 65(1992):514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M.Quantitative Ecological Theory: An Introduction to Basic Models. Kent: Croom-Helm, 1987.Google Scholar
Sax, D.F. “Latitudinal Gradients and Geographic Ranges of Exotic Species: Implications for Biogeography.” Journal of Biogeography 28 (2001):139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, L. “Bracken Fern Invasion in Southern Yucatán: A Case for Land Change Science.” Geographical Review 94(2)(2004):229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, L., and Geoghegan, J.. “Land Abandonment in an Agricultural Frontier After a Plant Invasion: The Case of Bracken Fern in Southern Yucatan, Mexico.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35(1)(2006):167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shigesada, N., and Kawasaki, K.. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D., and Lehman, C.. “Human-Caused Environmental Change: Impacts on Plant Diversity and Evolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98(2001):5433–5440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Kooten, G.C., Sedjo, R.A., and Bülte, E.H.. “Tropical Deforestation: Issues and Policies.” The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Folmer, H. and Tietenberg, T. eds., p. 199–248., London: Edward Elgar, 1999/2000.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P.M., D'Antonio, C.M., Loope, L.L., Rejmanek, M., and Westbrooks, R.. “Introduced Species: A Significant Component of Human-Caused Global Change.” New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21(1)(1997):1–16.Google Scholar