Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:21:18.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Likelihood of Positive Returns from Value-Added Calf Management Practices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Brian R. Williams ,
Eric A. DeVuyst ,
Derrell S. Peel  and
Kellie Curry Raper
Brian R. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi
Eric A. DeVuyst
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Derrell S. Peel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Kellie Curry Raper
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Extension faculty have been educating cow-calf producers about value-added calf management programs and the premiums available at auction from these management practices for years. Despite these efforts, producers express doubt regarding the likelihood of premiums and the profitability of value-added management practices. We use matching pairs to calculate the difference in premiums and net returns between adopters and nonadopters and calculate the likelihood of positive net returns (and premiums) for individual practices and practice bundles. The probability of positive net returns ranges from 57% for dehorning to 79% for a certified vac-45 program (calves certified by a third party to be preconditioned for a minimum of 45 days, vaccinated, and dehorned) and probabilities increase with more practices adopted.

Keywords

beef productionmatching pairsnonparametricvalue-added managementQ13Q16
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 125 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avent, R.K., Ward, C.E., and Lalman, D.L.. “Market Valuation of Preconditioning Feeder Calves”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(2004): 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, S.O., and Ichino, A.. “Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores”. The Stata Journal 2(2002): 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, S.C, Forero, L.C, and Nader, G.A.. “Video Market Data for Calves and Yearlings Confirms Price Discounts for Western Cattle”. California Agriculture 63(2009):225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulut, H., and Lawrence, J.D.. “The Value of Third-Party Certification of Preconditioning Claims at Iowa Feeder Cattle Auctions”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):625–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatney, K.T., Menkhaus, D.J., and Schmitz, J.D.. “Feeder Cattle Price Determinants: An Hedonic System of Equations Approach”. Review of Agricultural Economics. 18(1996): 193–211.Google Scholar
Dhuyvetter, K. Economics of Preconditioning Calves—Outlook for Fall 2010. Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University. 2010. Internet site: www.agmanager.info (Accessed April 23, 2012).Google Scholar
Dhuyvetter, K.C, Bryant, A.M., and Blasi, D.A.. “Case Study: Preconditioning Beef Calves: Are Expected Premiums Sufficient to Justify the Practice?” The Professional Animal Scientist 21(2005):502–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnell, J., Ward, C.E., and Swigert, S.. Costs and Benefits Associated with Preconditioning Beef Calves. Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Fact Sheet AGEC 247. 2008.Google Scholar
Fausti, S., and Gillespie, J.. “Measuring Risk Attitude of Agricultural Producers Using a Mail Survey: How Consistent Are the Methods?” The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 50(2006): 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J. “The Economics of Organic Versus Conventional Cow-Calf Production”. Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings. Birmingham, AL, February 4-7, 2012.Google Scholar
Hall, D.C, Knight, T.O., Coble, K.H., Baquet, A.E., and Patrick, G.F.. “Analysis of Beef Producers' Risk Management Perceptions and Desire for Further Management Education”. Review of Agricultural Economics. 25(2003):430–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, F. M., Neel, J. B., and Kirkpatrick, F. D.. Dehorning Calves. Agricultural Extension Service, University of Tennessee PB 1684, Knoxville, TN. 2009.Google Scholar
Kelly, A.P., and Janzen, E.D.. “A Review of Morbidity and Mortality Rates and Disease Occurrence in North American Feedlot Cattle”. The Canadian Veterinary Journal. La Revue Veterinaire Canadienne 27(1986):496–500.Google Scholar
King, M.E., Salman, M.D., Wittum, T.E., Odde, K.G., Seeger, J.T., Grotelueschen, D.M., Rogers, G.M., and Quakenbush, G.A.. “Effect of Certified Health Programs on the Sale Price of Beef Calves Marketed Through a Livestock VideoTape Auction Service from 1995 through 2005”. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 229(2006): 1389–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalman, D. and Smith, R.. Effects of Preconditioning on Health, Performance, and Prices of Weaned Calves. Oklahoma State University Extension Fact Sheet F-3529, Stillwater, OK. 2001.Google Scholar
McKinney, D. Marketing Opportunities Available to Oklahoma Beef Cattle Producers. Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Fact Sheet ANSI-3288, Stillwater, OK. 2009.Google Scholar
Pope, K.F., Schroeder, T.C., Langemeier, M.R., and Herbel, K.L.. “Cow-Calf Producer Risk Preference Impacts on Retained Ownership Strategies”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 43(2011):497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E.O., Harris, J.E., Borgwardt, R.E., Sween, M.L., and Connor, J.M.. ”Fenceline Contact of Beef Calves with Their Dams at Weaning Reducers the Negative Effects of Separation on Behavior and Growth Rate”. Journal of Animal Science 81(2003): 116–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhinehart, J. “Dehorning: Economically Important but Often Overlooked”. Cattle Business in Mississippi. Mississippi Cattlemen's Association. Jackson, MS, September 2009.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P.R., and Rubin, D.B.. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects”. Biometrica 70(1983): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, T.C, Mintert, J., Brazle, F., and Grunewald, O.. “Factors Affecting Feeder Cattle Price Differentials”. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 13(1988):71–81.Google Scholar
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2011.Google Scholar
Tauer, L.W. “Estimation of Treatment Effects of Recombinant Novine Somatotrophin Using Matching Samples”. Review of Agricultural Economics. 11(2009):411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurber, E.T., Bass, E.P., and Beckenhauer, W.H.. “Field Trial Evaluation of a Reo-coronavirus Calf Diarrhea Vaccine”. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine and Veterinary Science 41(1977):131–136.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. KO_LS155. October 27-December 15, 2010. Internet site: search.ams.usda.gov/mnsearch/mnsearch.aspx (Accessed January 2011).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2012. “Farm Labor”. Internet site: http://usda01.library.cornell.edu/usda/nass/FarmLabo//201 Os/2012/FarmLabo-05-17-2012.pdf (Accessed May 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Williams, B.R., DeVuyst, E.A., Peel, D., and Raper, K.C.. “Reducing Self-Selection Bias in Feeder Cattle Premium Estimates using Matched Sampling”. Working paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, 2013a (in review).Google Scholar
Williams, B.R., Raper, K.C., DeVuyst, E.A., Peel, D., Lalman, D., Richards, C., and Doye, D.. “Demographic Factors Affecting the Adoption of Multiple Value-Added Practices by Oklahoma Cow-Calf Producers”. Journal of Extension (2013b):in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G.S., Raper, K.C., DeVuyst, E.A., Peel, D., and McKinney, D.. “Determinants of Price Differentials in Oklahoma Value-Added Feeder Cattle Auctions”. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 37(2012): 114–127.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, L.C, Schroeder, T.C., Dhuyvetter, K.C., Olson, K.C., Stokka, G.L., Seeger, J.T., and Grotelueschen, D.M.. “The Effect of Value-Added Management on Calf Prices at Superior Livestock Auction Video Markets”. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 37(2012): 128–143.Google Scholar