Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:33:53.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LL601 Contamination and Its Impact on U.S. Rice Prices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Yarui Li ,
Eric J. Wailes ,
Andrew McKenzie  and
Michael Thomsen
Yarui Li
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas
Eric J. Wailes
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas
Andrew McKenzie
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas
Michael Thomsen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

LL601 is a genetically modified rice variety and unapproved for commercial use. Its presence was found in commercial shipments of U.S. rice in 2006. This article explores its impact on prices and volume marketed for both the United States and Thailand, the major export competitor. The results show a significantly adverse but short duration effect on the U.S. rice market and little to no effect on the Thai rice market.

Keywords

cointegrationerror correction modelevent study analysisGM contaminationLiberty Link Rice 601U.S. rice exportsC10C32Q11A52
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 31 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blue, E.N. Risky Business: Economic and Regulatory Impacts from the Unintended Release of Genetically Engineered Rice Varieties into the Rice Merchandising System of the U.S. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Greenpeace International, 2008.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.Y., Lo, A.W., and MacKinlay, C.A. The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Carter, C.A., and Smith, A. 2003. “Starlink Contamination and Impact on Corn Prices.” Paper presented at International Conference Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO: Where are We Heading? Capri, Italy, June 23-26, 2003.Google Scholar
Childs, N. Rice Situation and Outlook Yearbook. Market and Trade Economics Division. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, RCS-2008.Google Scholar
Doran, H.E., and Quilkey, J.J. “Harmonic Analysis of Seasonal Data: Some Important Properties.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1972):646-51.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F., and Granger, C.W.J. “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55(1987):251-76.Google Scholar
Engle, R.F., and Yoo, B.S. “Forecasting and Testing in Co-integrated Systems.” Journal of Econometrics 35(1987): 143–59.Google Scholar
Gene Watch UK. GM Contamination Register Report 2007. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Greenpeace International, 2007.Google Scholar
Golub, A., Wilson, C.A., and Featherstone, A.M. “The Effects of Starlink Corn Food Safety Events on Returns and Risk of Agribusiness Firms.” Purdue University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Staff Paper 05-08. 2005.Google Scholar
Granger, C.W.J. “Developments in the Study of Cointegrated Economic Variables.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 48(1986): 213–28.Google Scholar
Hannan, E.J. “The Estimation of Seasonal Variation in Economic Time Series.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(1963):31–44.Google Scholar
Hoban, T. “Trends in Consumer Attitudes about Agricultural Biotechnology.” Journal of Agro-biotechnology Management and Economics 1(1998):3–7.Google Scholar
Jin, Y.H., Power, G.J., and Elbakidze, L. “The Impact of North American BSE Events on Live Cattle Futures Prices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(2008): 1279–86.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., and Schroeder, T.C. “Effects of Meat Recalls on Futures Market Prices.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 31(2002): 47–58.Google Scholar
MacKinlay, C.A. “Event Studies in Economics and Finance.” Journal of Economic Literature 35(1997): 13–39.Google Scholar
McKenzie, A.M., and Thomsen, M.R. “The Effect of E. Coli 0157:H7 on Beef Prices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(2001): 431–44.Google Scholar
Thomsen, M.R., and McKenzie, A.M. “Market Incentives for Safe Foods: An Examination of Shareholder Losses from Meat and Poultry Recalls.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001):526-38.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agriculture Service (FAS). 2004-2006. Thailand Grain and Feed Weekly Rice Price Update. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). 2008. Acreage. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Wailes, E.J. “Rice Global Trade, Protectionist Policies, and the Impact of Trade Liberalization.” Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries. Aksoy, M. Ataman and Beghin, John C., eds. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2005.Google Scholar