Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:07:57.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring and Explaining the Decline in U.S. Cotton Productivity Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

Stephen C. Cooke  and
W. Burt Sundquist
Stephen C. Cooke
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Idaho
W. Burt Sundquist
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tornquist input quantity indices were used to derive total and partial factor productivity measures for U.S. cotton across time, region, and scale. Total factor productivity for U.S. cotton increased .2 percent per year between 1974 and 1982. Partial productivity measures revealed that yield growth was about .6 percent and input use grew about .4 percent per year. Cotton enterprises in Alabama and Mississippi gained and those in the Texas High Plains lost competitive advantage relative to California. In 1982, very large (1750-5900 acres) and large (950-1749 acres) cotton enterprises were 2 percent more productive than medium-size enterprises (570-949 acres).

Keywords

cottonproductivitycompetitive advantagescale economiesindicesenterprise budgets
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , July 1991 , pp. 105 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahearn, M., Dudman, R. and Hanson, G.. “Financial Performance of Specialized Cotton Farms.” Washington, DC: USDAERS, Agr. Info. Bull. 58, May 1988.Google Scholar
Ball, V.E. “Output, Input, and Productivity Measurement in U.S. Agriculture, 1948-79.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):475–486.Google Scholar
Chan, M.W.L., and Mountain, D.C.. “Economies of Scale and the Tornquist Discrete Measure of Productivity Growth.” Rev. Econ. and Stat., 65(1983):663–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, S.C. and Sundquist, W.B.. “Cost Efficiency in U.S. Corn Production.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 71(1989): 1003–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diewert, W.E. “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers.” J. Econometrics, 4(1976):115–145.Google Scholar
Duffy, P.A., Richardson, J.W., and Wohlgenant, M.K.. “Regional Cotton Acreage Response.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 19(1987):99–109.Google Scholar
Firch, R.S. “Adjustments in a Slowly Declining U.S. Cotton Production Industry.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 55(1973):892–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. “The Source of Measured Productivity Growth: United States Agriculture, 1940-1960.” J. Pol. Econ., 71(1963):331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazilla, M., and Kopp, R.. “Intertemporal and Interspatial Estimates of Agricultural Productivity.” Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation. Capalbo, S.M. and Antle, J.M., eds. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1988.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. “Demand Functions with Limited Budgets.” Econometrica, 3(1935):66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masud, S.M., Lacewell, R.D., Stoll, J.R., Walker, J.K., and Leser, J. F.. “Impact of a More Intensive Insect Pest Infestation Level on Cotton Production: Texas High Plains.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 17(1985):117–125.Google Scholar
McKinion, J.M., Reddy, V.R., and Baker, D.N.. “Yield and Productivity Study in Cotton: Final Conclusions.” Proc. Beltwide Cotton Res. Confi, 155, 1988.Google Scholar
Meredith, W.R. “Final Report of the Cotton Foundation Yield and Productivity Study. “ Proc. Beltwide Cotton Res. Confi, 33–37, 1987.Google Scholar
Ray, S.C. “A Translog Cost Function Analysis of U.S. Agriculture, 1937-1977.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 64(1982):490–498.Google Scholar
Schultz, T.W. The Economic Organization of Agriculture. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1953.Google Scholar
Starbird, I.R. and Hazera, J.. “Yield Trends in Cotton-Producing Regions.” Cotton and Wool Outlook & Situation. Washington, D.C: USDAERS, Aug. 1982.Google Scholar
Thirtle, C.G. ‘Technological Change and Productivity Slowdown in Fields Crops: United States, 1939-78.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 17(1985):33–42.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Measurements of U.S. Agricultural Productivity: A Review of Current Statistics and Proposal for Change.” Washington, D.C: National Economics Division, ESCS. Tech. Bull. 1614, Feb. 1980.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Cotton: Background for the 1985 Farm Legislation.” Washington, D.C: ERS. Agr. Inf. Bull. 471, Sept. 1984.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service. Firm Enterprise Data System, National Survey of Producers of Agricultural Commodities. Conducted by Krenz, R. and Garst, G., ERS, 1975 and 1983. Stillwater, Oklahoma, unpublished.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. County Planted Acres, Yield and Production Data by Commodity, 1972 to 1985.Breuggan, J., ed. Washington, D.C: SRS/National Agricultural Statistical Service. Available on tape.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Census of Agriculture. Washington, D.C: Government Printing Office, 1974, 1978, and 1982.Google Scholar