Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:54:31.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimizing Farm-to-Mill Cotton Cleaning Cost

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Blake K. Bennett  and
Sukant K. Misra
Blake K. Bennett
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock
Sukant K. Misra
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study focuses on least-cost farm-to-mill cotton cleaning configurations employing survey, regression, and simulation techniques. The resulting least-cost cotton cleaning configurations, employing standard textile technology, included the use of one lint cleaning in the ginning stage. The use of a field cleaner in the harvesting stage was also found to be optimal with some variation based on the desired yarn quality. Results of the study indicated that the optimal cleaning configurations were distinctly different from currently used practices, such that appropriate changes could save the cotton industry between $0.30 and $0.60 per bale of cotton, depending on the desired yarn quality.

Keywords

cotton cleaningleast-cost configurationsyarn quality
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , December 1997 , pp. 363 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, W.S. “Evaluation of an Optimization Model of Cotton Ginning Systems.” Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 28(1985):411-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, R.V. “Ginning Recommendations for Processing Machine-Stripper Cotton.” In Cotton Ginners Handbook, eds., Anthony, W.S. and Mayfield, W.D., pp. 242-43. Agr. Handbook No. 503, USDA/Agricultural Research Service, Cotton Division, Washington DC, 1994.Google Scholar
Barker, G.L., Baker, R.V., and Laird, J.W.. “GIN-QUAL: A Cotton Processing Quality Model.” Agr. Systems 35(1990):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, B.K. “Efficient Cotton Cleaning in a System Framework.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 1995.Google Scholar
Chen, C. “U.S. Textile Mill Manufacturers' Valuation of Cotton Quality Attributes.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, August 1995.Google Scholar
Childers, R. Extension ginning engineer, Texas Agr. Ext. Ser., Texas A&M University System, College Station. Personal communication, 27 March 1995.Google Scholar
Ethridge, D.E., Barker, G.L., and Bergan, D.L.. “Maximizing Net Returns to Gin Lint Cleaning of Stripper-Harvested Cotton.” Appl. Engineering in Agr. 7(1995):7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gannaway, J.R., Owen, D.F., Moore, J., Supak, J.R., Stickler, C., Dever, J.K., Murphy, M., and Schoenhals, L.. “Cotton Performance Tests in the Texas High Plains and Trans-Pecos Areas of Texas, 1992.” Tech. Rep. No. 93-1, Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Lubbock and Halfway, 1993.Google Scholar
Gillis, M., Fuller, S., Childers, R., Parnell, C. Jr., and Yarlagadda, S.. “Cotton Gin Plant Compliance with Air Pollution Regulations in Texas: Effect on Plant Costs and Returns.” In Proceedings of the 1995 Beltwide Cotton Economics and Marketing Conference, pp. 399–406. Memphis TN: National Cotton Council, 1995.Google Scholar
Hudson, D., Ethridge, D., and Brown, J.. “Producer Prices in Cotton Markets: An Evaluation of Reported Price Information Accuracy.” Agribus.: An Internal. J. 12(1996):353-62.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. Assistant Director, International Textile Center, Lubbock TX. Personal interview, May 1995.Google Scholar
Trutzschler GMBH & Co. Textile machinery manufacturing company, Monchengladbach, Germany. Telephone interview, 23 March 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Classification of Cotton. Agr. Handbook No. 688, USDA/Agricultural Marketing Service, Cotton Division, Washington DC, April 1993.Google Scholar