Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:50:54.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Need for the Systems Approach to Rural Development Research*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Luther Tweeten
Luther Tweeten*
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Problems of low income, high incidence of poverty, inadequate or expensive community services, net out-migration and high dependency rates in rural areas are now well documented and widely recognized. Not so well recognized is, “What can be done about these problems?” This paper suggests systems analysis to answer this question. Following a description of the systems approach to planning, a case is made for applying such an approach to rural development. Finally, some new observations are presented on the economic payoff from various public programs suitable for inclusion in systems planning.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , July 1974 , pp. 43 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Oklahoma State Agricultural Experiment Station Article No. 131.

References

[1] Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relationships (ACIR). “State-Local Taxation and Industrial Location.” A-30. Washington, D.C, 1967.Google Scholar
[2] Averch, Harvey, et al. How Effective is Schooling? Report to the President's Commission on School Finance. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation, 1971.Google Scholar
[3] Bowman, Mary Jean. “Schultz, Denison and the Contribution of ‘Eds’ to National Economic Growth.” Journal of Political Economy. 72: 450-64, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Denison, Edward. Why Growth Rates Differ. Washington, D.C: The Brookings Institution, 1967.Google Scholar
[5] Economic Development Administration. “Program Evaluation: The Economic Development Administration Growth Center Strategy.” Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1972.Google Scholar
[6] Giltmier, James E. “National Rural Development Leaders School.” (Mimeographed, Speech presented to rural development leaders school, Lincoln, Nebraska) Washington, D.C: Senate Subcommittee on Rural Development, 1973.Google Scholar
[7] Goldstein, Jon. “The Effectiveness of Manpower Training Programs.” Paper No. 3 of Joint Economic Committee, 92nd Congress. Washington, D.C: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
[8] Hansen, Niles. “Regional Development and the Rural Poor.” Journal of Human Resources, 4: 205-14, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Hansen, Niles, ed. Growth Centers in Regional Economic Development. New York: The Free Press, 1972.Google Scholar
[10] Hollister, Robinson and Palmer, John. “The Impact of Inflation on the Poor.” Chapter 14 in Redistribution to the Rich and the Poor. Edited by Kenneth Boulding and Martin Pfaff. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1972.Google Scholar
[11] Jencks, Christopher, et al. Inequality. New York: Basic Books, 1972.Google Scholar
[12] Janssen, Larry. “Comparative Profit Rates of U.S. Manufacturing Firms by City Size.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, Oklahoma State University, 1974.Google Scholar
[13] Kershaw, Joseph and Courant, Paul. Government Against Poverty. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co., 1970.Google Scholar
[14] Kuehn, John; Bender, Lloyd, Green, Bernal, and Hoover, Herbert. “Impact of Job Development on Poverty in Four Developing Areas.” Agricultural Economics Report No. 225. Washington, D.C: ERS, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 1972.Google Scholar
[15] Madden, J. Patrick. “Poverty Projections in Relation to Aggregate Demand, Economic Growth and Unemployment.” Chapter 30 in Rural Poverty in the United States. Report by the President's National Advisory Commission on Rural Poverty. Washington, D.C: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1968.Google Scholar
[16] Nelson, James, and Tweeten, Luther. “Subsidized Labor Mobility An Alternative Use of Development Funds.” Annals of Regional Science, 7: 57–66, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Office of Economic Opportunity. “Public Employment: Policy Issues and Data Needs.” Washington, D.C: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, OEO, 1971.Google Scholar
[18] Ribich, Thomas. Education and Poverty. Washington, D.C: The Brookings Institution, 1968.Google Scholar
[19] Schultz, T.W. “Investment in Human Capital.” American Economic Review, 51: 1–17, 1961.Google Scholar
[20] Shaffer, Ronald. “The Net Economic Gain from New Industry in Eastern Oklahoma.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Oklahoma State University, 1972.Google Scholar
[21] Shallah, Salim and Tweeten, Luther. “Economic Returns to Technical Education.” Oklahoma State University Agri. Exp. Sta. Bulletin B-685, 1970.Google Scholar
[22] Singer, Neil M. “Federal Tax Incentives for Regional Growth.” Southern Economic Journal 38: 230-7, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Stinson, Thomas. “The Effects of Taxes and Public Financing Programs on Local Industrial Development.” Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 1968.Google Scholar
[24] Tweeten, Luther. Foundations of Farm Policy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[25] Tweeten, Luther. “Applying Welfare Economic Theory to Rural Development Research.” Quantitative Techniques with Application to Rural Development Research. Edited by Bradford and Saunders. Proceedings of seminar sponsored by Southern Farm Management Research Committee and Farm Foundation. Lexington: Dept. of Agric. Econ., University of Kentucky, 1972.Google Scholar
[26] Tweeten, Luther. “Manpower Implications of the Rural Development Act of 1972.” Manpower Planning for Jobs in Rural America. Proceedings of conference sponsored by Center for Rural Manpower and Public Affairs. East Lansing: Michigan State University, 1972.Google Scholar
[27] Tweeten, Luther. “Emerging Issues for Sparsely Populated Areas and Regions Under a National Growth Policy.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 55, No. 5, Dec, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[28] U.S. Dept. of Labor. “Rural Manpower Dilemmas.” 1971 Manpower Report of the President. Washington, D.C: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 1971.Google Scholar
[29] U.S. Dept. of Labor. “Side-effects.” Manpower. Washington, D.C: Manpower Administration, Dec, 1973.Google Scholar
[30] Weber, Bruce. “Trickling Down: The Responsiveness of Rural and Rural Poor Family Income and Labor Supply to Regional Economic Growth.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis University of Wisconsin, 1973.Google Scholar
[31] White, Fred, and Tweeten, Luther. “Internal Economics of Rural Elementary and Secondary Schooling.” Socio-Economic Planning Science, 7: 353-69, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar