Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:16:16.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Nonhypothetical Ranking and Auction Mechanism for Novel Products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Callie McAdams ,
Marco A. Palma ,
Charles Hall  and
Ariun Ishdorj
Callie McAdams
Affiliation:
Informa Economics, McLean, Virginia
Marco A. Palma
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Charles Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Sciences, and Holder of the Ellison Chair in International Floriculture, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Ariun Ishdorj
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Preferences for pomegranates, including some novel pomegranate varieties, were evaluated using an experimental auction and nonhypothetical preference ranking mechanism. Additional information on the taste and health benefits of the products was provided to mimic the information-gathering process on novel products. Product familiarity, product information, and reference prices were key factors in explaining willingness to pay for the included novel products. Results from the auction and nonhypothetical preference ranking procedures were divergent. Furthermore, interactions were detected between information treatments and product characteristics.

Keywords

experimental auctionnovel productpreference rankingwillingness to payC91
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 35 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abidoye, B.O., Bulut, H., Lawrence, J.D., Mennecke, B, and Townsend, A.M.. “U.S. Consumers' Valuation of Quality Attributes in Beef Products.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 43(2011):1–12.Google Scholar
Alfnes, F. “Willingness to Pay versus Expected Consumption Value in Vickrey Auctions for New Experience Goods.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89,4(2007):921–31.10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01028.xGoogle Scholar
Alfnes, F. “Valuing Product Attributes in Vickrey Auctions When Market Substitutes Are Available.” European Review of Agriculture Economics 36(2009):133–9.10.1093/erae/jbp013Google Scholar
Aviram, M., Rosenblat, M., Gaitini, D., Nitecki, S., Hoffman, A., Dornfield, L., Volkova, N., Presser, D., Attias, J., Liker, H., and Hayek, T.. “Pomegranate Juice Consumption for 3 Years by Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis Reduces Common Carotid Intima-media Thickness, Blood Pressure, and LDL Oxidation.” Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Lothian) 23(2004):423–33.10.1016/j.clnu.2003.10.002Google Scholar
Bernard, J.C, and Bernard, D.J.. “What Is It about Organic Milk? An Experimental Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(2009):826–36.10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01258.xGoogle Scholar
Bernard, J.C., and He, N.. “Confounded by the Field: Bidding in Food Auctions When Field Prices Are Increasing.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2010):275–87.Google Scholar
Calfee, J., Winston, C., and Stempski, R.. “Econometric Issues in Estimating Consumer Preference from State Preference Data: A Case Study of the Value of Automobile Travel Time.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2001):699–707.10.1162/003465301753237777Google Scholar
Carpenter, J.M., and Moore, M.. “Consumer Demographics, Store Attributes, and Retail Format Choice in the U.S. Grocery Market.” International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 34,6(2006):434–52.10.1108/09590550610667038Google Scholar
Chang, J.B., Lusk, J.L., and Norwood, F.B.. “How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91,2(2009):518–34.10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01242.xGoogle Scholar
Drichoutis, A.C., Lazaridis, P., and Nayga, R.M. Jr. “The Role of Reference Prices in Experimental Auctions.” Economics Letters 99(2008):446–48.10.1016/j.econlet.2007.09.010Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.Google Scholar
Hensher, D.A., and Greene, W.H.. “The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice.” Transportation 30,2(2003):33–76.Google Scholar
Hole, A.R. “Fitting Mixed Logit Models by Using Maximum Simulated Likelihood.” Stata Journal 7(2007):388–401.Google Scholar
Huang, T.H.-W., Peng, G., Kota, B.P., Li, G.Q., Yamahara, J., Roufogalis, B.D., and Li, Y. “Pomegranate Flower Improves Cardiac Lipid Metabolism in a Diabetic Rat Model: Role of Lowering Circulating Lipids.” British Journal of Pharmacology 145(2005):767–74.10.1038/sj.bjp.070624515880139Google Scholar
Jaeger, S.R., and Harker, F.R.. “Consumer Evaluation of Novel Kiwifruit: Willingness-to-Pay.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85(2005):2519–26.10.1002/jsfa.2330Google Scholar
Kanter, C., Messer, K.D., and Kaiser, H.M.. “Does Production Labeling Stigmatize Conventional Milk?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91,4(2009):1097–109.10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01317.xGoogle Scholar
Lansky, E.P., and Newman, R.A.. “ Punica granatum (Pomegranate) and Its Potential for Prevention and Treatment of Inflammation and Cancer.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 109(2007):177–206.10.1016/j.jep.2006.09.00617157465Google Scholar
List, J.A., and Gallet, CA.. “What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 20(2001):241–54.10.1023/A:1012791822804Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., Feldkamp, T., and Schroeder, T.C. “Experimental Auction Procedure: Impact on Valuation of Quality Differentiated Goods.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86,2(2004):389–405.10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00586.xGoogle Scholar
Lusk, J.L., Fields, D., and Prevatt, W.. “An Incentive Compatible Conjoint Ranking Mechanism.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90,2(2008):487–98.10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01119.xGoogle Scholar
McFadden, D. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” Frontiers in Econometrics. Zarembka, P., ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Murphy, J.J., Allen, P.G., Stevens, T.H., and Weatherhead, D.. “A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in State Preference Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 30(2005):313–25.10.1007/s10640-004-3332-zGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J.A., Donaldson, C., and Shackley, P.. “Implicit versus Explicit Ranking: On Inferring Ordinal References for Health Care Programmes Based on Differences in Willingness-to-Pay.” Journal of Health Economics 24(2005):990–96.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.04.00115893827Google Scholar
Pantuck, A.J., Leppert, J.T., Zomorodian, N., Aronson, W., Hong, J., Barnard, R.J., Paarsch, N., H.J., , and Hong, H.. An Introduction to the Structural Econometrics of Auction Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Seeram, H. Liker, H. Wang, R. Elashoff, D. Heber, M. Aviram L., Ignarro, and Belldegrun, A.. “Phase II Study of Pomegranate Juice for Men with Rising Prostate-Specific Antigen following Surgery or Radiation for Prostate Cancer.” Clinical Cancer Research 12(2006):4018–26.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-229016818701Google Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, A., and Skrondal, A.. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rickard, B.J., Liaukonyte, J., Kaiser, H.M., and Richards, T.J.. “Consumer Response to Commodity-Specific and Broad-based Promotion Programs for Fruits and Vegetables.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93,5(2011):1312–27.10.1093/ajae/aar042Google Scholar
Rousu, M., Huffman, W.E., Shogren, J.F., and Tegene, A.. “Effects and Value of Verifiable Information in a Controversial Market: Evidence from Lab Auctions of Genetically Modified Food.” Economic Inquiry 45(2007):409–32.10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00017.xGoogle Scholar
Shiner, M., Fuhrman, B., and Aviram, M.. “Macrophage Paraoxonase 2 (PON2) Expression Is Up-Regulated by Pomegranate Juice Phenolic Antioxidants via PPARy and AP-1 Pathway Activation.” Atherosclerosis 195(2007):313–21.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.01.00717292903Google Scholar
Srinivasan, S., Bhat, R., and Holguin-Veras, J.. “Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Security Perception on Intercity Mode Choice: A Panel Rank-Ordered Mixed Logit Model.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1942(2006):9–15.10.3141/1942-02Google Scholar
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2009.Google Scholar
Vickrey, W. “Counterspeculation, Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders.” The Journal of Finance 16(1961):8–37.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02789.xGoogle Scholar
Wong, S.C., Wong, C.W., and Sze, N.N.. “Attitudes of Public Light Bus Drivers to Penalties to Combat Red Light Violations in Hong Kong.” Transport Policy 15(2008):43–54.10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.009Google Scholar