Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:41:45.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk and Site Factors Affecting Potential Nitrogen Delivery in the Virginia Coastal Plain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Wei Peng  and
Darrell J. Bosch
Wei Peng
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute andState University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Darrell J. Bosch
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute andState University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of cropland slope, distance to surface water, farmers' risk attitudes, and farmers' nitrogen (N) fertilizer applications on potential N delivery to streams and costs of reducing N delivery were evaluated for a representative Virginia peanut-cotton farm. Target MOTAD and generalized stochastic dominance were used to select preferred plans for different levels of risk aversion. Costs of reducing N delivery were lower on farms where fields were located close to surface water, where N was overapplied relative to extension fertilizer recommendations, and where the operator was risk averse. Cropland slope had less effect on cost of reducing N delivery relative to other factors.

Keywords

costnonpoint source pollutionrisk programmingsimulationstochastic dominancetargeting
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , April 2001 , pp. 173 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abler, D. G., and Shortle, J. S. “The Political Economy of Water Quality Protection from Agricultural Chemicals.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20(1991): 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural Conservation Innovation Center (ACIC). “Promoting Conservation Innovation in Agriculture Through Crop Insurance.” Agricultural Conservation Innovation Center, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. March 23, 2000. Available: http://www.agconserv.com/promote.html Accessed May 2000.Google Scholar
Babcock, B. A. “The Effects of Uncertainty on Optimal Nitrogen Applications.” Review of Agricultural Economics 14(1992):270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, B. A., Chalfant, J. A., and Collender, R. N. “Simultaneous Input Demands and Land Allocation in Agricultural Production under Uncertainty.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 12(1987):207–215.Google Scholar
Bosch, Darrell J., Pease, James W., Batie, Sandra S., and Shanholtz, Vernon O.. Crop Selection, Tillage Practices, and Chemical and Nutrient Applications in Two Regions of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Virginia Water Resources Research Center Bulletin 176. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1992.Google Scholar
Bosch, Darrell J. and Pease, James W. “Economic Risk and Water Quality Protection in Agriculture.” Review of Agricultural Economics. 22(2000)438–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, John, Gary, B.Johnson, V., Bouzaher, Aziz, and Miltz, David “Optimal Spatial Management of Agricultural Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(1989):404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpentier, C.L., Bosch, D.J., and Batie, S.S. “Using Spatial Information to Reduce Costs of Controlling Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27(1998):72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesapeake Bay Program. “1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement.” Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, December 9, 1983. Available: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/1983ChesapeakeBayAgreement.pdf/ Accessed: May 24, 2000.Google Scholar
Chesapeake Bay Program. “Overview of the Bay Program: America's Premier Watershed Restoration Program.” Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, February 1, 2000. Available: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/overview.htm/ Accessed: May 24, 2000.Google Scholar
Feinerman, E, Choi, E.K., and Johnson, S.R. “Uncertainty and Split Nitrogen Applications in Corn Production.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(1990):975–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, T. R., and Butt, A. J.. “The Role of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay Anoxia.” In Perspectives on Chesapeake Bay, 1994: Advances in Estuarine Sciences, eds., Nelson, S., and Elliott, P., pp. 1–43. Solomons Island, Maryland: Chesapeake Bay Program, 1994.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute. ”FAPRI 1996: U.S. Agricultural Outlook.” Staff Report #1-96, Iowa State University, University of Missouri-Columbia, August 1996.Google Scholar
Fuglie, Keith O. and Bosch, Darrell J. “Economic and Environmental Implications of Soil Nitrogen Testing: A Switching-Regression Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):981–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, S., Shih, C., Cochran, M.J., and Raskin, R., “A Generalized Stochastic Dominance Program for the IBM PC.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 21(1989): 175–182.Google Scholar
Hall, J. and Howett, Ciannat “Albemarle-Pamlico: Case Study in Pollutant Trading: Most of the Nutrients Came from Nonpoint Sources.” EPA Journal 20(1994):27–29.Google Scholar
King, R., and Oamek, G. “Risk Management by Colorado Dryland Wheat Farmers and the Elimination of the Disaster Assistance Program.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(1983):247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, D. K. “Risk Considerations in the Reduction of Nitrogen Fertilizer Use in Agricultural Production.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15(1990):234–244.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. “Second Degree Stochastic Dominance With Respect to a Function.” International Economic Review 18(1977):477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda For Agriculture. Edited by Overton, J.. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Norris, P.E. and Shabman, L.A. “Economic and Environmental Considerations for Nitrogen Management in the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7(1992): 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. 1997 Cotton Information. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 1997.Google Scholar
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management. Water Quality Progress in North Carolina. 1988-1989 305(B) Report. Report No. 9007. Raleigh, North Carolina, 1990.Google Scholar
Novotny, V. and Olem, H.. Water Quality: Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1994.Google Scholar
Peng, Wei. “Risk Analysis of Adopting Conservation Practices on A Representative Peanut-Cotton Farm in Virginia.” Unpublished MS thesis. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, September 1997.Google Scholar
Randhir, Timothy O., and Lee, John G.. “Designing Spatial Incentives to Manage Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution.” Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University. Selected paper, Annual Meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, July 27-30, 1997. Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M. O., Horan, R. D., and Smith, M. E.. “Economics of Water Quality Protection from Nonpoint Sources: Theory and Practice.” Agricultural Economic Report AER 782. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C., November 1999.Google Scholar
Rosegrant, M. W., and Roumasset, J. A. “The Effect of Fertiliser on Risk: A Heteroscedastic Production Function with Measurable Stochastic Inputs.” Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 29(1985):107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanholtz, V.O. and Zhang, N.. Supplementary Information Of Virginia Geographic Information System. Special Report, VirGIS 88-21. Blacksburg, Virginia: VirGIS Laboratory, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1988.Google Scholar
Simpson, T.W., Donohue, S.J., Hawkins, G.W., Monnett, M.M., and Baker, J.C.. “The Development and Implementation of the Virginia Agronomic Land Use Evaluation System (VALUES).” Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, December 1992.Google Scholar
SriRamaratnam, S., Bessler, D. A., Rister, M. E., Matocha, J. E., and Novak, J. “Fertilization Under Uncertainty: An Analysis Based on Producer Yield Expectations.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69(1987):349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturt, Guy. “1997 Crop Enterprise Cost Analysis for Eastern Virginia.” Eastern District Farm Management Staff. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Staie University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1997a.Google Scholar
Sturt, Guy. Personal communication. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Dinwiddie, Virginia, 1997b.Google Scholar
Tauer, Loren W. “Target MOTAD.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(1983): 606–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teague, M. L., Bernardo, D. J., and Mapp, H. P. “Farm-Level Economic Analysis Incorporating Stochastic Environmental Risk Assessment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995):8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA-Economic Research Service. “Albemarle-Pamlico Drainage Area Study Links Agricultural Production and Natural Resource DATA.” RTD Updates: Area Studies, Number 1. Economic Research Service, Washington D.C., January 1994.Google Scholar
USDA-SCS. Soil Survey of City of Suffolk, Virginia. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., June, 1981.Google Scholar
USDA, Soil Conservation Service, and Statistical Laboratory of Iowa State University. National Resources Inventory (1987): Instruction for Collecting Sample Data. Washington D.C., Government Printing Office, September 1986.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Water Quality Inventory: 1992 Report to Congress. EPA 841-R-94-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C., March 1994.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Guidance for Water Quality-Based Decisions: The TMDL Process.” April 1991. Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/tmdl/decisions/declc.html Accessed: February 24 1999.Google Scholar
VanDyke, Laura S., Bosch, Darrell J., and Pease, James W. “Impacts of Within-Farm Spatial Variability on Nitrogen Pollution Control Costs.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31(1999):149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDyke, Laura S., Pease, James W., Bosch, Darrell J., and Baker, James “Nutrient Management Planning on Four Virginia Livestock Farms: Impacts on Net Income and Nutrient Losses.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 54(1999) :499–505.Google Scholar
VanVuuren, W., Giraldez, C., and Stonehouse, D. P.. “Importance of Benefit Identification in Evaluating Water Pollution Control Programs.” Working Paper WP94/08, Department of Agricultural Economics and Business, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, June 1994.Google Scholar
Williams, J., Jones, S., and Dyke, P.. “The EPIC Model.” In EPIC—Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator: 1. Model Documentation, eds., Sharpley, A.N. and Williams, J.R., pp. 3–29. USDA Tech. Bull. No. 1768. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.Google Scholar