Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:50:59.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association in Extension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ronald D. Knutson
Ronald D. Knutson*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A & M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , July 1985 , pp. 17 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christainsen, Martin K., ed., Speaking of Trade: Its Effect on Agriculture. Minn. Agr. Ext. Ser. Spec. Rpt. 72; University of Minnesota, St. Paul; November, 1978.Google Scholar
ESCOP, Experiment Station Committee on Policy. Genetic Engineering Policy for the State Agricultural Experiment Stations, Washington, D.C.; November 11, 1981.Google Scholar
Evenson, Robert E. “Intellectual Property Rights and Agribusiness Research and Development: Implications for the Public Agricultural Research System.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65(1983):967–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Extension Service (a). Agriculture and Natural Resources: National Extension Evaluation Project, Washington, D.C.; USDA; April, 1980.Google Scholar
Extension Service (b). Challenge and Change, Washington, D.C.; USDA; 1984.Google Scholar
Extension Service (c). Evaluation of Economic and Social Consequences of Cooperative Extension Programs, Washington, D.C.; USDA; January, 1980.Google Scholar
Guither, H.D., ed., Who Will Control U.S. Agriculture? North Central Regional Extension Publication 32; University of Illinois, Urbana; August, 1972.Google Scholar
Locke, John, Hume, David, and Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Social Contract, London: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. An Assessment of the United States Food and Agricultural Research System, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress; December, 1981.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. Commercial Biotechnology: An International Analysis, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress; January, 1984.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. “Summary of Technology Papers.” Unpublished manuscript, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress; August, 1984.Google Scholar
Schuh, G. Edward. “The New Macroeconomics of Agriculture.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 58(1976):802–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G. Edward. “Agriculture in an Open Economy.” Testimony presented to the Joint Economic Committee of Congress; Washington, D.C.; April, 1983.Google Scholar
Smith, Edward, Richardson, James, and Knutson, Ronald D.. Cost Pecuniary Economies in Cotton Production and Marketing: A Study of Texas Southern High Plains Cotton Producers, Texas Agri. Exp. Sta. Bull., Texas A & M Univ., B-1475; August, 1984.Google Scholar
Stanton, B. F.Changes in Farm Structure, Cornell Agr. Econ. Staff Paper, Dept. of Agr. Econ.; Sept., 1984.Google Scholar
USDA. A Time to Choose: Summary Report on the Structure of Agriculture; Washington, D.C.; January, 1981.Google Scholar