Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T21:04:06.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching Consumer Economics Using Taste Panels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

John W. McClelland  and
Josef M. Broder
John W. McClelland
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
Josef M. Broder
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The teaching of economic theory has become a major topic in the economics literature. Siegfried and Fels point to the growing number of economists who consider their special interest to be economic education.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , December 1982 , pp. 91 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boehlje, Michael D. and Eidman, Vernon R.. “Simulation and Gaming Models: Applications in Teaching and Extension Programs.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):987–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broder, Josef M. “Hands-On-Models: Innovations for Teaching Economic Theory.” Selected paper, AAEA Meetings, Pullman, Washington, July 1979.Google Scholar
Chew-Wah, Chung, McDowell, Earl E., Frost, Mellissa, and Grabow, W. J. F.. “Faculty Utilization of Instructional Methods and Media: A Case Study.” NACTA Journal, June (1981):31–33.Google Scholar
Deaten, Angus and Muellbauer, John. Economics and Consumer Behavior. New York: Cambridge, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. E. and Gould, J. P.. Microeconomic Theory. 4th ed. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin, 1975.Google Scholar
French, Charles E. “Selected Alternative Programs for Bringing the Real World to the Undergraduate Classroom.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 56(1975):1163–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. “Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Educational Production Functions.” J. Human Resources. 14(1979):351–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, Jack. Price Theory and Applications. 2nd. ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
Kelly, Allen C. “The Students as a Utility Maximizer.” J. Econ. Educ. Spring (1975):82–92.Google Scholar
Mandercheid, Lester V. and Ferres, Bernie. “Field Experience in Public Affairs Management: The Michigan State University Approach.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):993–997.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. Douglas and Vasche, John D.. “An Educational Production Approach to Teaching Effectiveness and Evaluation.” J. Econ. Educ. Spring (1978):123–126.Google Scholar
Nelson, Gene A. and Harris, Tiffen D.. “Designing an Instructional Package: The Use of Probabilities in Farm Decision-Making.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):993–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, James P.Intermediate Microeconomics. Chicago: Science Research Associates. 1976.Google Scholar
Schimd, A. Allan. Property, Power and Public Choice. New York: Praeger, 1978.Google Scholar
Siegfried, John J. and Fels, Rendig. “Research on Teaching College Economics: A Survey.” J. Econ. Literature 17(1979):923–969.Google Scholar
White, Fred C. and White, Sherry K.. “Incorporating Small Group Activities into Agricultural Economics Classes.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar