No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Technological Advances in Agricultural Economics Curricula
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2015
Abstract
The potential use of computers and electronic technology have created considerable interest among educators in agricultural economics. This paper provides an overview of the use of electronic technology within agricultural economics curricula; examines areas in which technological development offers promise and examines issues associated with adoption of the technology.
- Type
- Invited Papers and Discussions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995
References
Bloom, Benjamin, Ed. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives; the Classification of Educational Goals, by a Committee of College and University Examiners. New York: David McKay, 1956.Google Scholar
Bowers, C. A.The Cultural Dimensions of Educational Computing. New York: Teachers College Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Callister, Thomas A. “Educational Computing's New Direction: Cautiously Approaching An Unpredictable Future,” Educ. Theory 44(Spring 1994):239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandran, Ram. “Analysis of Economic Effects of Government Policies: An Interactive Computer Model,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 68–77, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Chin, Sabrina Su-fen and John Hortin, A.. “Teachers' Perceptions of Instructional Technology and Staff Development,” J. Educational Technology Systems 22(No. 2, 1993-1994):83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlgran, Roger A. “Lest We Forget: Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Teaching Innovations,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 135–141, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Debertin, David L. and Goetz, Stephan J.. “Applications of Computer Graphics to Instruction in Agricultural Economics,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 11–21, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, August, 1992.Google Scholar
DeFelice, Michael S., and Monson, Michael J.. “Using Computer Assisted Hypermedia in the Classroom, NACTA Journal, 37(June 1993):40–43.Google Scholar
Denk, Joseph, Martin, Jeanette and Sarangarm, Suchint. “Not Yet Comfortable in the Classroom: A Study of Academic Computing at Three Land-Grant Universities,” J. Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 22(No. 1, 1993-1994):39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallupe, Brent R. and Cooper, William. “Brainstorming Electronically,” Sloan Management Review, pp. 27–36, Fall 1993.Google Scholar
Jalbert, N. “Computer Literacy and the Forgotten Professor,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED270036), April 1986.Google Scholar
Kearsley, Greg, Hunter, Beverly, and Furlong, Mary. We Teach With Technology, New Visions for Education. Published by Franklin, Beedle and Associates, Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
Kenkei, Phil “Incorporating a Computer Simulation Program into an Undergraduate Agribusiness Class: Experiential Learning or Recreation?,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 122–129, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Koontz, Stephen R., Peel, Derrell S., Trapp, James N. and Ward, Clement E.. “Experimental Economics Simulator of the Fed Cattle Market,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 96–102, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Livergood, Norman. “A Study of the Effectiveness of a Multimedia Intelligent Tutoring System,” J. Educ. Technology Systems, Vol. 22(No. 4, 1993-1994):337–344.Google Scholar
McKeachie, Wilbert J.Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Beginning College Teacher, Eighth Edition. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, 1986.Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerald C. and Seitz, Wesley D.. “The Need for Better Software for Economics Principles: Issues in Implementation,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 39–46, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Park, William M., Gray, Morgan D., English, Burton C. and Cleland, Charles L.. “Green Revolution/Exaction: A Role-Playing Simulation of an Agricultural-Based Developing Country Economy,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 47–55, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Ruppel, Fred J. “The Chalkboard and Alternative Teaching Media: Advantages and Disadvantages,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 22–31, Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Sammons, Martha C. “Motivating Faculty to Use Multimedia as a Lecture Tool,” T.H.E. Journal (February 1994):88–90.Google Scholar
Thunberg, Eric M. “An Experiential Learning Game to Demonstrate Common Property and Open Access Resource Problems,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 103–112, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Walbert, M. “Writing better Software for Economics Principles Textbooks,” J. of Econ. Educ. (Summer 1989):281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Fred C. “Agricultural Trade Policy: An Instructional Game,” New Technologies and Innovations in Agricultural Economics Instruction Proceedings, pp. 32–38, August, 1992.Google Scholar
Wilson, Kathleen, and Morren, George E. B. Jr.Systems Approaches for Improvement in Agriculture and Resource Management, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1990.Google Scholar