Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:35:57.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The U.S. Animal Identification Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

David P. Anderson
David P. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Texas AgriLife Extension Service, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Animal identification has been one of the most contentious issues for the last decade in the livestock industry. More specifically, at issue is the idea of a government-sponsored identification system, although it is unclear that an identification system forced on the industry by the market would be any more popular. Rancor over the issue has set livestock groups at odds over the merits of establishing such a framework; it has highlighted differences between species, within species, and by size and scale of agriculture. Given its politically sensitive nature, many groups without a tie to agriculture have been drawn in to lobby on the issue. This article examines the U.S. experience with the development of an animal identification system.

Keywords

animal identificationNAISQ18
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 543 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AgriPulse. Vol. 5, No. 11. March 18, 2009.Google Scholar
Anderson, D.P. “USDA NAIS Listening Session Observations.” Livestock Market Comments, Vol. 5, No. 2. May 26, 2009.Google Scholar
Clifford, J. Testimony of Dr. John Clifford Deputy Administrator for Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Statement Before the House Committee on Agriculture's Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Hearing to “Review Animal Identification Systems.” March 11, 2009.Google Scholar
Gabbett, J. “Congressional Hearing Debates Making Animal ID Mandatory.” Meatingplace. March 12, 2009.Google Scholar
Gray, C.W. “The National Animal Identification System: Basics, Blueprint, Timelines, and Processes.” WEMC FS #1-04, Fall 2004.Google Scholar
Hagel, C. Statement for the Congressional Record in support of “The United States Animal Identification Plan Implementation Act.” Congressional Record, February 2004.Google Scholar
Hagerman, A., Looney, J.C., McCarl, B., Anderson, D.P., and Ward, M. “Rapid Effective Trace-Back Capability Value in Reducing the Cost of a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Event.” Selected Paper, SAEA Annual Meeting, February 2010.Google Scholar
H.R. 3787. February 2004. NAIS Benefit Cost Research Team. “Benefit-Cost Analysis of the National Animal Identification System.” January 14, 2009.Google Scholar
National Food Animal Identification Task Force. Safeguarding Animal Agriculture. National Identification Work Plan, November 2002.Google Scholar
R-CALF. “Use Reduced NAIS Funds to Dissolve Program Altogether.” November 23, 2009.Google Scholar
United States Animal Identification Plan. “Protecting American Animal Agriculture.” Draft Document, Version 4.0, September 2003.Google Scholar
USDA. National Animal Identification System (NAIS). Draft Version, November 2006.Google Scholar
USDA, APHIS. National Animal Identification System (NAIS)-A User Guide and Additional Information Resources, Version 2.0, December 2007a.Google Scholar
USDA, APHIS. Business Plan for Advancing Animal Disease Traceability, December 2007b.Google Scholar
USDA, APHIS. Program Standards and Technical Reference, October 2007c.Google Scholar