Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:58:57.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The U.S. Tobacco Buyout: A Partial and General EquilibriumAnalysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Andrew Schmitz ,
D.J. Haynes ,
Troy G. Schmitz  and
Evan D. Schmitz
Andrew Schmitz
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
D.J. Haynes
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Troy G. Schmitz
Affiliation:
Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management at Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona
Evan D. Schmitz
Affiliation:
Richland, Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article analyzes the impact of removing the U.S. tobacco program inboth a partial and general welfare economics framework. In apartial-equilibrium framework, a consumer tax-funded quota buyout can resultin producer gains, consumer losses, net losses resulting from higher prices,and deadweight losses. In a general-equilibrium framework, society can gainfrom the buyout resulting from considerable potential savings from reducedhealthcare costs attributable to a reduction in smoking. Additionally, wepresent a model that addresses the addictive qualities of tobacco whileconsidering the effects of the quota buyout. We also conclude that anotherpossible effect of the buyout is an increase in worker productivity becauseemployees who are able to quit smoking reduce the amount of smoking-relatedsick days taken.

Keywords

addictiongeneral equilibriumhealthcare costsproduction quotastobaccowelfare economics110J20Q00QUQ18
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , August 2013 , pp. 411 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberg, A.J., and Samet, J.M.. “Epidemiology of Lung Cancer.” Chest 123(2003):1–73.10.1378/chest.123.1.112527589Google Scholar
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2012. Internet site: www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-031941.pdf (Accessed December 2012).Google Scholar
Brown, A.B., Rucker, R.R., and Thurman, W.N.. “The End of the Federal Tobacco Program: Economic Impacts of the Deregulation of U.S. Tobacco Production.” Review of Agricultural Economics 29(2007):635–55.10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00378.xGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.B., and Snell, W.M.. U.S. Tobacco Situation and Outlook Report. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 2012.Google Scholar
Brown, A.B., Snell, W.M., and Tiller, K.H.. “The Changing Political Environment for Tobacco— Implications for Southern Tobacco Farmers, Rural Economies, Taxpayers, and Consumers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31(1999):291–308.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2004. Internet site: www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/sgr_2004/index.htm (Accessed November 2012).Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Final Vital Statistics Report. Deaths: Final Data for 2007. 58,19(2010).Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses— United States, 1997-2001.” Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 54(2005):625-28.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Smoking-Attributable Mortality, Years of Potential Life Lost, and Productivity Losses— United States, 2000-2004.” Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57(2008):1226-28.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lung Cancer Statistics—United States, 2009. 2013. Internet site: www.cdc.gov/cancer/lung/statistics/.Google Scholar
Chan, K.K., and Capehart, T.C.. “Health Concerns or Price: Which Takes Credit for Declining Cigarette Consumption in the United States?” Choices (New York, NY.) 1(2004):43–46.Google Scholar
Fulginiti, L., and Petrin, R.. “The Theory and Measurement of Producer Response under Quotas.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 75(1993):97–106.10.2307/2109630Google Scholar
Goodwin, B.K., and Sumner, D.A.. Market Supply Parameters under Mandatory Production Quotas. Unpublished manuscript. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, 1990.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. “Smoking's Internalities.” Regulation 25(2003/2004):52–57.Google Scholar
He, Y, Jiang, B., Li, L.S., Ko, L., Wu, L., Sun, D.L., He, S.F., Liang, B.Q., Hu, F.B., and Lam, T.H.. “Secondhand Smoke Exposure Predicted COPD and Other Tobacco-Related Mortality in a 17-year Cohort Study in China.” Chest 142(2012):909-18.10.1378/chest.11-288422628493Google Scholar
HealthDay.com. 2012. Internet site: http://consumer. healmday.com/Article.asp?AID= 671078 (Accessed November 28, 2012).Google Scholar
Howlader, N., Noone, A.M., Krapcho, M., Neyman, N., Aminou, R., Altekruse, S.F., Kosary, C.L., Ruhl, J., Tatalovich, Z., Cho, H., Mariotto, A., Eisner, M.P., Lewis, D.R., Chen, H.S., Feuer, E.J., and Cronin, K.A., (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 2012. Internet site: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/ (Accessed December 2012), based on November 2011 SEER data submission.Google Scholar
Jones, W. “The Master Settlement Agreement and Its Impact on Tobacco Use 10 Years Later. Lessons for Physicians about Health Policy Making.” Chest 137,3(2010):692–700.10.1378/chest.09-098220202950Google Scholar
Just, R.E., Hueth, D.L., and Schmitz, A.. The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar
Schmitz, A., Kennedy, P.L., and Hill-Gabriel, J.. “Restoring the Florida Everglades through a Sugar Land Buyout: Benefits, Costs, and Legal Challenges.” Environment and Ecology 3(2012):72–87.Google Scholar
Schmitz, A., Moss, C.B., Schmitz, T.G., Furtan, H.W., and Schmitz, H.C.. Agricultural Policy, Agribusiness, and Rent-Seeking Behaviour. 2nd ed. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T.G., Schmitz, A., and Haynes, D.J.. “Inflated Production Quota Gains Paid for by a Consumption Tax.” Theoretical Economics Letters 2(2012):67–68.10.4236/tel.2012.21012Google Scholar
Serletis, G.S., and Fetzer, J.J.. Modeling thè Impact of the U.S. Tobacco Quota Buyout. Office of Economics Working Paper. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 2008.Google Scholar
Sharma, A., Deeb, A.P., Iannuzzi, J.C., Rickles, A.S., Monson, J.R.T., and Fleming, F.J.. “Tobacco Smoking and Postoperative Outcomes after Colorectal Surgery.” Annals of Surgery, October 10, 2012.AMBIGUOUS (357 citations)Google Scholar
Sloan, R.A., Smith, V.K., and Taylor, D.H. Jr. The Smoking Puzzle: Information, Risk Perception, and Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Tirrell, M. More than Half of U.S. Smokers Have Tried to Quit. Bloomberg.com, November 8, 2012. Internet site: www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-08/more-than-half-of-u-s-smokers-have-tried-to-quit.html (Accessed November 29, 2012).Google Scholar
USA Today.com. Judge Orders Tobacco Companies to Say They Lied. November 27, 2012. Internet site: www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/27/judge-smoking-cigarettes-tobacco-lied/1730305/ (Accessed November 28, 2012).Google Scholar
Weimer, D.L., Vining, A.R., and Thomas, R.K.. “Cost-Benefit Analysis Involving Addictive Goods: Contingent Valuation to Estimate Willingness-to-Pay for Smoking Cessation.” Health Economics 18(2009):181–202.10.1002/hec.136518566968Google Scholar
Weng, S.F., Ali, S., and Leonardi-Bee, J.. “Smoking and Absence from Work: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Occupational Studies.” Addiction (Abingdon, England) 108(2012):307-19.23078132Google Scholar