Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:47:21.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of contrasting C32 alkane dosing and faecal sampling regimes to estimate herbage dry matter intake by beef cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

A. S. RICHMOND ,
A. R. G. WYLIE ,
A. S. LAIDLAW  and
F. O. LIVELY
A. S. RICHMOND
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, County Antrim, UK
A. R. G. WYLIE*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, County Antrim, UK Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, 18a Newforge Lane, Belfast, UK
A. S. LAIDLAW
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Crossnacreevy, County Down, UK
F. O. LIVELY
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Large Park, Hillsborough, County Down, UK
*
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: alastair.wylie@afbini.gov.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two experiments were carried out to evaluate different dosing and sampling regimes for estimating the dry matter intake (DMI) of vegetation by grazing beef cattle. Experiment 1 compared the DMI of a perennial ryegrass pasture by 48 grazing beef cattle dosed with C32n-alkane and faecally sampled at different time intervals. The cattle, of dairy and suckler origin, were balanced by origin and allocated to one of three alkane-dosing treatments (n=16): T1, dosed once daily (10.30 h) with two 500 mg boluses of C32 alkanes; T2, dosed twice daily (09.00 and 16.00 h) with a 500 mg bolus of C32n-alkane; and T3, dosed twice daily (07.00 and 19.00 h) with a 500 mg bolus of C32n-alkane. Faecal samples were collected concurrently with dosing in each treatment. Dosing interval had no effect on estimated DMI, when calculated using the n-alkane content of faeces sampled concurrently with dosing, suggesting that once-daily dosing with concurrent faecal sampling is adequate to estimate DMI by beef cattle. The objective of Expt 2 was to compare the accuracy of herbage DMI estimated using a once-daily C32 alkane dosing regime and n-alkane concentrations in faeces sampled at 09.00, 13.00, 17.00 and 21.00 h, against DMI measured directly. Twelve Holstein-Friesian bulls (mean body weight 265 kg) were housed individually in digestibility stalls and offered harvested perennial ryegrass or harvested semi-natural upland vegetation, both ad libitum. The DMI estimated by once-daily dosing with n-alkane and concurrent per rectum faecal sampling did not differ significantly from the directly measured DMI for either herbage type. It is concluded that a once-daily alkane dosing and concurrent faecal sampling protocol is adequate to reliably estimate the DMI of both upland and lowland pasture vegetation by beef cattle.

Type
Animal Research Papers
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 153 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 353 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Champion, R. A., Rutter, S. M., Penning, P. D. & Rook, A. J. (1994). Temporal variation in grazing behaviour of sheep and the reliability of sampling periods. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42, 99–108.Google Scholar
Crawford, A. D. (2002). The effect of breed of dairy cow on oestrous behaviour, fertility and animal performance. Ph.D. Thesis, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.Google Scholar
Cushnahan, A. & Gordon, F. J. (1995). The effects of grass preservation on intake, apparent digestibility and rumen degradation characteristics. Animal Science 60, 429–438.Google Scholar
De-Stefani Aguiar, A., Forbes, T. D. A., Rouquett, F. M., Tedeschi, L. O. & Randel, R. D. (2013). Evaluating the statistical variation in estimating forage dry matter intake of grazing Brahman bulls using n-alkanes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 151, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, P. & Stakelum, G. (1988). The use of n-alkanes and chromic oxide as markers for determining feed intake, faecal output and digestibility in dairy cows. In Proceedings of the 12th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Dublin, Ireland (Ed. Flanagan, S.), pp. 154–158. Dublin: European Grassland Federation.Google Scholar
Dove, H. & Mayes, R. W. (1991). The use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores – a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 42, 913–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H. & Mayes, R. W. (2006). Protocol for the analysis of n-alkanes and other plant-wax compounds and for their use as markers for quantifying the nutrient supply of large mammalian herbivores. Nature Protocols 1, 1680–1697.Google Scholar
Ferreira, L. M. M., Garcia, U., Rodrigues, M. A. M., Celaya, R., Dias-da-Silva, A. & Osoro, K. (2007). Estimation of feed intake and apparent digestibility of equines and cattle grazing on heathland vegetation communities using the n-alkane markers. Livestock Science 110, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giráldez, F. J., Lamb, C. S., Lopez, S. & Mayes, R. W. (2004). Effects of carrier matrix and dosing frequency on digestive kinetics of even-chain alkanes and implications on herbage intake and rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84, 1562–1570.Google Scholar
Mann, J. & Stewart, P. G. (2003). Kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) intake determined by alkanes administered in a xantham gum suspension. South African Journal of Animal Science 33, 27–31.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W. & Dove, H. (2000). Measurement of dietary nutrient intake in free-ranging mammalian herbivores. Nutrition Research Reviews 13, 107–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayes, R. W., Lamb, C. S. & Colgrove, P. M. (1986). The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 161–170.Google Scholar
Oliván, M., Ferreira, L. M. M., Celaya, R. & Osoro, K. (2007). Accuracy of the n-alkane technique for intake estimates in beef cattle using different sampling procedures and feeding levels. Livestock Science 106, 28–40.Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Harding, S. A., Murray, D. A., Soutar, D. M., Baird, D. B., Glaser, A. I., Welham, S. J., Gilmour, A. R., Thompson, R. & Webster, R. (2011). The Guide to GenStat Release 14, Part 2: Statistics. Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK: VSN International.Google Scholar
Porter, M. G. (1992). Comparison of sample preparation methods for the determination of the gross energy concentration of fresh silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology 37, 207–208.Google Scholar
Premaratne, S., Fontenot, J. P. & Shanklin, R. K. (2005). Use of n-alkanes to estimate intake and digestibility by beef steers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 18, 1564–1568.Google Scholar
Undi, M., Wilson, C., Ominski, K. H. & Wittenberg, K. M. (2008). Comparison of techniques for estimation of herbage dry matter intake by grazing beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 88, 693–701.Google Scholar