Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:44:27.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Competition and yield compensation in relation to breeding sugar beet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Godfrey J. Curtis
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding InstituteCambridge.
Kenneth G. Hornsey
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding InstituteCambridge.

Summary

Samples were prepared to simulate the populations which would be obtained from the random interpollination of known numbers of inbred lines. This was done by mixing together seed of a vigorous and a less vigorous genotype in calculated proportions. The less vigorous represented the inbred component which would result from selling and sibbing within the constituent lines, while the more vigorous represented the hybrid fraction. The difference in yield between the two genotypes was comparable with the level of enhancement which could be expected in the hybrids as a result of heterosis. Root yields of these populations in the field suggest that depression due to the presence of inbred individuals in a synthetic variety may be predicted by a mathematical model. Yields calculated from the model to allow for various levels of compensation enabled the order of magnitude of the compensation to be estimated. However, the presence of quite small numbers of less vigorous individuals was detectable. Given the limitations imposed by the assumptions necessary to simulate these varieties, the optimal number of lines for an open-pollinated variety may be predicted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dexter, S. T., Frakes, M. G. & Snyder, F. W. (1967). A rapid and practical method of determining extractable white sugar as may be applied to the evaluation of agronomic practices and grower deliveries in the sugarbeet industry. J. Am. Soc. Sug. Beet Technol. 14, 433–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maude, K. B. & Keyworth, W. G. (1967). A new method for the control of seedborne fungal disease. Seed Trade Rev. 19, 202–3.Google Scholar