Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:49:05.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of formaldehyde treatment of soya-bean meal and rapeseed meal on the amino acid profiles and acid-pepsin solubility of rumen undegraded protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Varvikko ,
J. E. Lindberg ,
J. Setälä  and
Liisa Syrjälä-Qvist
T. Varvikko
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S–750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
J. E. Lindberg
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S–750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
J. Setälä
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S–750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Liisa Syrjälä-Qvist
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S–750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Soya-bean meal and rapeseed meal treated with 0, 0·4 or 0·8 g formaldehyde/100 g crude protein (N × 6·25) was incubated in the rumen in nylon bags with 10 and 40 μm aperture.

Disappearance of dry matter and nitrogenous compounds was reduced with increasing formaldehyde treatment.

The proportion of acid-pepsin soluble nitrogen in the undegraded residues of untreated and treated soya-bean meal was similar to the original samples. For rapeseed meal the proportion of acid-pepsin soluble nitrogen in the undegraded residues decreased with increasing rumen incubation time. This reduction decreased with increasing formaldehyde treatment.

Concentration of amino acids in the undegraded residues did not generally deviate from those in the original samples. However, a distinguishable decrease in the methionine concentration was observed in all the rapeseed meal samples and in glutamic acid concentration in rapeseed meal treated with 0 and 0·4 g formaldehyde/100g- crude protein.

Most of the changes due to rumen incubation were smaller using the 10 μm bags than using the 40 μm bags. However, the bag pore size did not play a decisive role in the conclusions of the results given.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 603 - 612
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amos, H. E. (1980). Treatment of proteins to improve utilization by ruminants. Proceedings of the Georgia Nutrition Conference for Feed Industry, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
Anon. (1966). Royal Board of Agriculture. Regulations. No. 15, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Anon. (1978). Alimentation des Ruminants. INRA Publications, Route de St-Cyr, 78000 Versailles.Google Scholar
Burroughs, W., Nelson, D. K. & Mertens, D. R. (1975). Protein physiology and its application in the lactating cow: the metabolizable feeding standard. Journal of Animal Science 41, 933–944.Google Scholar
Chalupa, W. (1976). Degradation of amino acids by the mixed rumen microbial population. Journal of Animal Science 43, 828–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, K. J., Akin, D. E. & Costerton, J. W. (1977). Rumen bacteria: interaction with particulate dietary components and response to dietary variation. Federation Proceedings 36, 193–197.Google Scholar
Demeyer, D., Clayes, E., Van Nevel, C. J. & De Winne, R. (1982). Amino acid composition of residual protein after incubation within synthetic fibre bags in the rumen. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie, Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 47, 251–252.Google Scholar
Ferguson, K. A. (1975). The protection of dietary proteins and amino acids against microbial fermentation in the rumen. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 448–464. The University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Ganev, G., Ørskov, E. R. & Smart, R. (1979). The effect of roughage or concentrate feeding and rumen retention time on total degradation of protein in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalczyk, J., Jaczewska, A. & Morawiec, M. (1979). Digestion in vitro of protein of feeds treated with different amounts of formaldehyde. Eoczniki Nauk Rolniczych Seria B, t. 99, z. 3, 53–62.Google Scholar
Lindberg, J. E. (1981a). The effect of basal diet on the ruminal degradation of dry-matter, nitrogenous compounds and cell walls in nylon bags. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 159–169.Google Scholar
Lindberg, J. E. (1981b). The effect of sample size and sample structure on the degradation of dry-matter, nitrogen and cell walls in nylon bags. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 71–76.Google Scholar
Lindberg, J. E., Clason, C., Ciszuk, P. & Den Braver, E. (1982). Buffer-soluble and short-term in sacco degradable crude protein in relation to ruminal ammonia concentration in sheep. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 77–82.Google Scholar
Lindberg, J. E. & Knutsson, P. G. (1981). The effect of bag pore size on the loss of particulate matter and on the degradation of cell wall fibre. Agriculture and Environment 6, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, J. E. & Varvikko, T. (1982). The effect of bag pore size on the ruminal degradation of drymatter, nitrogenous compounds and cell walls in nylon bags. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 163–171.Google Scholar
MacGregor, C. A., Sniffen, C. J. & Hoover, W. H. (1978). Amino acid profiles of total and soluble protein in feedstuff's commonly fed to ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 61, 566–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahadevan, S., Erfle, J. D. & Sauer, F. D. (1980). Degradation of soluble and insoluble proteins by Bacteroides amylophilus protease and by rumen microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 50, 723–728.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Aitchison, E. M. (1981). Direct estimation of the extent of contamination of food residues by microbial matter after incubation within synthetic fibre bags in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 691–693.Google Scholar
Mathers, J. C., Thomas, R. J., Gray, N. A. M. & Johnson, I. L. (1979). The nutritive value of feed proteins which escape degradation in the rumen. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 38, 122A.Google ScholarPubMed
Phillips, W. A. (1981). In vitro digestion of soybean meal treated with formaldehyde. Journal of Animal Science 53, 1616–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A., Seymour, S. J. & Armstrong, D. G. (1981). The effect upon the nutritional value of soya-bean meal of incubation in the bovine rumen. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 40, 82A.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Orskov, E. R. & Smith, R. H. (1977). Calculation of the N-requirement for ruminants from metabolism studies. In 2nd Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition,(ed. Tamminga, S.), pp. 126–129. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Centre for Agricultural Publishing.Google Scholar
Setalä, J. (1983). The nylon bag technique in the determination of ruminal feed protein degradation. Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 55, 1–78.Google Scholar
Setälä, J. & Syrjälä-Qvist, L. (1982). Ruminal degradation of protein of processed rapeseed meal. Paper presented in the 33rd Annual Meeting of EAAP, 16–19 August, Leningrad.Google Scholar
Sharma, H. R., Ingals, J. R. & Parker, R. J. (1974). Effects of treating rapeseed meal and casein with formaldehyde on the flow of nutrients through the gastrointestinal tract of fistulated Holstein steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 54, 305–313.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. & Mohamed, O. E. (1977). Effect of degradation in the rumen on dietary protein entering the ruminant duodenum. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 153A.Google ScholarPubMed
Spears, J. W., Hatpield, E. E. & Clark, J. H. (1980). Influence of formaldehyde treatment of soybean meal on performance of growing steers and protein availability in the chick. Journal of Animal Science 50, 750–755.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S. (1979). Protein degradation in the forestomachs of ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 49, 1615–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E., Trenkle, A. & Burroughs, W. (1979). Evaluation of protective agents applied to soybean meal and fed to cattle. I. Laboratory measurements. Journal of Animal Science 49, 1337–1345.Google Scholar
Wohlt, J. E., Sniffen, C. J. & Hoover, W. H. (1973). Measurement of protein solubility in common feedstuffs. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 1052–1057.Google Scholar