Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:09:14.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of nitrogen on cereal yields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. R. Bullen
Affiliation:
N.A.A.S. Eastern Province, Cambridge
W. J. Lessells
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station

Extract

This paper provides a general review of the effect of nitrogenous fertilizers on the yields of wheat, barley and oats. The results of 270 experiments carried out during the last decade in England and Wales have been examined.

With the exceptions noted below wheat and barley crops have produced a grain response of 3·0–3·5 cwt./acre to a standard dressing of 0·25 cwt. N/acre; this agrees well with earlier results obtained by Crowther & Yates. The widely grown winter wheat varieties, Hybrid 46, Cappelle Desprez, Bersée, Nord Desprez and Atle each produced an average response of more than 4·0 cwt./acre to the standard dressing. Of the spring barleys, Kenia, Proctor and Herta are also of greater than average responsiveness. The average response of spring oats to the standard dressing was only 1·2 cwt./acre.

The number of experiments is insufficient to allow precise conclusions to be drawn on the effect of autumn dressings, but the evidence suggests that in the drier eastern counties autumn nitrogen may give as good a response as the equivalent spring application. Small dressings of nitrogen provide equal responses whether applied early or late in spring; larger applications need to be applied early in spring (March or April) to obtain the highest yields. There is no evidence that divided dressings are more efficient than a single dressing applied in early spring.

For highly responsive varieties of winter wheat and spring barley mentioned above a dressing of 0·6–0·7 cwt. N/acre is recommended, producing a net return of approximately £10 per acre. For other varieties of winter wheat, and for spring wheat and spring barley, the recommended dressing of 0·5 cwt. N/acre produces a net return of about £5 per acre.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beesley, D. W. & Bullen, E. R. (1956). Exp. Husb. 1, 18.Google Scholar
Church, B. M. (1956). J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 11, 711721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, G. A. (1940). J. Minist. Agric. 47, 107.Google Scholar
Cowie, G. A. (1948). Chem. & Ind. p. 211.Google Scholar
Crowther, E. M. & Yates, F. (1941). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 9, 77.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. W. (1950). Agriculture, Land., 57, 1.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. W. & Hutchinson, J. B. (1951). Agriculture, Lond., 58, 208.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. W. (1953 a). Agriculture, Lond., 60, 233.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. W. (1953 b). Agriculture, Lond., 60, 328.Google Scholar
Halliday, D. J. (1948). Bull. Jealott's Hill Res. Sta. no. 6.Google Scholar
Holliday, R. (1955). Agric. Prog. 30, 42.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. H., Proctor, J. & Trevains, D. (1938). J. Agric. Sci. 28, 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. W. & Robinson, D. H. (1952). Agriculture, Lond., 58, 596.Google Scholar